A suggestion for the mods - Metropolis.
Instead of locking brexit threads, which is a little bit draconian in my humble opinion, why not move them to general?
Not intended as a criticism, I think you are doing a good job as mods which can be a thankless task, so thank you! But good threads can end up being locked too early and it stifles the OPs original post.
A suggestion for the mods - Xileno

A number of reasons, there are probably more but these spring to mind:

This is a motoring website and although it's accepted that politics does sometimes get bound up in motoring issues, we try and keep it to a minimum, as in the policy. The issue with Brexit is that it's a hugely political subject, with deeply entrenched views on both sides. Combine this with the 'anonymity' of the internet where often people will be sharper and more abrupt than they would face to face, then it doesn't take much for any thread to degrade. It can be off-putting to existing and potential members, doesn't look good in terms of website reputation and increases moderation workload, whichever forum it's in or moved to.

Usually by the time a thread has started to degrade, anything of value has been discussed. Also we are volunteers, we can't be monitoring all the time, it's just easier to lock threads if we believe it's gone beyond the point of no return.

Probably more than anything, people are just sick of Brexit. I know best friends and families that have been split by it, it's just too much of a hot subject. I haven't trawled through the archives but I'm certain Brexit has been done to death here before (it has been on other forums), I expect some of the threads have been deleted or hidden.

I will move this to general discussion in a bit.

Edited by Xileno on 04/07/2021 at 22:11

A suggestion for the mods - Bromptonaut

The difficulty, or one of them, is that people are posting stuff about (say) the recent investments by Nissan and whatever the PSA conglomeration is now as victories for Brexit.

There's another, equally legitimate, argument that says they're nothing of the kind and would have happened anyway and probably with less effort a financial lubrication from Government.

In terms of wider politics it's becoming difficult to say Boo!! to Brexit for fear of an accusation of backsliding and being an "enemy of the people".

A suggestion for the mods - Rerepo

I think one of the most shocking things to me is the number of people who are eager to talk down Great Britain. We are an amazing country capable of great things and yet there exists a sizable minority of citizens keen to talk down any kind of good news or success. So far Brexit seems to have supercharged our motor industry - with more to come!

A suggestion for the mods - groaver

We are actually a kingdom made up of three countries.

A suggestion for the mods - misar

We are actually a kingdom made up of three countries.

Actually Great Britain comprises three countries. The (United) Kingdom was created in the 1920s to comprise four countries including the newly formed Northern Ireland.

A suggestion for the mods - groaver

We are actually a kingdom made up of three countries.

Actually Great Britain comprises three countries. The (United) Kingdom was created in the 1920s to comprise four countries including the newly formed Northern Ireland.

Yes but it was great Britain being talked about not United Kingdom.

Edited by groaver on 05/07/2021 at 20:28

A suggestion for the mods - sammy1

Somebody is splitting hairs and living in the past. It is no wonder Northern Ireland feels out of things ,even Boris has left them in a bit of a mess post Brexit

A suggestion for the mods - movilogo

Since UK = GB + NI, it makes sense to have UK symbol in number plates instead of GB.

However, GB is ISO2 country code for UK. Hence many people (especially around the world) equates UK with GB.

A suggestion for the mods - groaver

My point was similar. People around the world equate England with UK and vice versa.

Great Britain or UK, call it whatever you want.

It's not a country though.

Edited by groaver on 05/07/2021 at 21:39

A suggestion for the mods - Brit_in_Germany

We are actually a kingdom made up of three countries.

Actually Great Britain comprises three countries. The (United) Kingdom was created in the 1920s to comprise four countries including the newly formed Northern Ireland.

Actually, it was the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland which was changed after independence, the united kingdom bit referring to the unification of the crowns of England and Scotland.

A suggestion for the mods - FP

"I think one of the most shocking things to me is the number of people who are eager to talk down Great Britain. We are an amazing country capable of great things and yet there exists a sizable minority of citizens keen to talk down any kind of good news or success."

I don't recall hearing or reading anything that would amount to running down GB/the UK. People can be critical of certain aspects of what and who we are without "talking down" the country.

"So far Brexit seems to have supercharged our motor industry - with more to come!"

Really? On the basis of Nissan's plan for Sunderland, which involves a lot of government money? Anything else?

N.B. I voted Leave, but I didn't expect any economic miracles - the reverse, in fact. My vote was based on totally different issues.

A suggestion for the mods - Rerepo

"So far Brexit seems to have supercharged our motor industry - with more to come!"

Really? On the basis of Nissan's plan for Sunderland, which involves a lot of government money? Anything else?

N.B. I voted Leave, but I didn't expect any economic miracles - the reverse, in fact. My vote was based on totally different issues.

You voted Leave??!! Your comments certainly don't read like those of a Leaver.

A suggestion for the mods - FP

"You voted Leave??!! Your comments certainly don't read like those of a Leaver."

Maybe because I took a view that wasn't based on (a) prejudice against foreigners and (b) some out-of-date view about the significance of the UK on the world stage.

Your comment suggests you expect all those who voted Leave to conform to some stereotype.

A suggestion for the mods - alan1302

I think one of the most shocking things to me is the number of people who are eager to talk down Great Britain. We are an amazing country capable of great things and yet there exists a sizable minority of citizens keen to talk down any kind of good news or success. So far Brexit seems to have supercharged our motor industry - with more to come!

It's good news about Nissan, but what about Honda leaving?

A suggestion for the mods - Rerepo

It's good news about Nissan, but what about Honda leaving?

Honda had long planned to consolidate manufacturing back in Japan, absolutely nothing to do with Brexit!

Perhaps you'd like to comment instead on Nissan closing THREE factories in Spain?

A suggestion for the mods - Bromptonaut

Honda had long planned to consolidate manufacturing back in Japan, absolutely nothing to do with Brexit!

So far as I recall the consensus of reports at the time was that Brexit closed doors for them in relation to continued use of the Swindon plant for example for electric car components.

Perhaps you'd like to comment instead on Nissan closing THREE factories in Spain?

What about it?

A suggestion for the mods - alan1302

It's good news about Nissan, but what about Honda leaving?

Honda had long planned to consolidate manufacturing back in Japan, absolutely nothing to do with Brexit!

Perhaps you'd like to comment instead on Nissan closing THREE factories in Spain?

Nissan building it's new car/batteries here is nothing to do with Brexit either...they were already here...when the UK left the EU they had a trade deal which Nissan found acceptable...they have some money from the UK government which enticed them to stay. All that could have happed in the EU or out of it.

What would you like me to comment about the closure of the factories in Spain?

A suggestion for the mods - Engineer Andy

The difficulty, or one of them, is that people are posting stuff about (say) the recent investments by Nissan and whatever the PSA conglomeration is now as victories for Brexit.

There's another, equally legitimate, argument that says they're nothing of the kind and would have happened anyway and probably with less effort a financial lubrication from Government.

In terms of wider politics it's becoming difficult to say Boo!! to Brexit for fear of an accusation of backsliding and being an "enemy of the people".

True, but it's just as easy to get the hairdrier treatment from some for opinions contrary to theirs on that many other subject from the other side of the political aisle.

One of the problems associated with the pandemic is that most of us have more time on our hands at home because we aren't able to go out and about and do things/meet people as we were beforehand.

That frustration combined with a far more general polarisation of many issues in recent years has made the situation worse, not helped by the use of (un)social media by many in society - often those doing most of the pushing of this polarisation.

My advice is for everyone to stay well away from the likes of twitter, facebook and similar platforms. There is a place for genuine discussion of political issues/current affairs (i.e. issues not connected to the main thrust of a forum), but given the above and the lack of genuine discussion on all newspaper (and similar) forums, it's increasing difficult.

I think things would be better if people discussed issues more face-to-face, because they are more disposed to treat one another more reasonably, often because:

a) the person's identtiy is then known, so any bad behaviour is soon known to freinds/family/colleagues (unlike on forums/media sites where most people have anonymous [or near to] usernames);

b) people speaking are more likely to just talk about issues they know well, or at least be more cautious when expressing an opinion, as they may not know if someone else attending has far more knowledge on a subject or, as happens sometimes on panel discussion programmes, a person's hypocrisy or lies are shown up by another person attending,

c) the people attending (even just down thie local pub) have made an effort to go there, and don't want to waste the trip, so make the best of it. Being on a foum is easy in comparison where someone can just log off and be no worse off, perhaps apart from a bruised ego.

I would note in response to Bromp's comment about that other thread that myself and others have also refrained from any 'crowing' on the other side because I could see similar arguments coming up from his side of the debate.

I cannot see an easy way out of this conundrum unless people on both sides of an debate respect that those on the other should be able to have a view and be able to express it freely, even if that view is completely at odds to theirs.

Free speech should only ever be limited by words or incitement to serious misconduct or law breaking. That being said, I personally don't want this forum to be like some others I know of that have gone from being about other things (i.e. a specialist forum with a bit of discussion now and then on politics/current affairs away from the prime site discussion topic) to mainly politics with a bit on the specialist issue.

At least with news/politics forums, everyone knows what it's about, and it doesn' put potential new members (and some longer-standing ones) off joining/staying because the forum has got very partsain/political.

Let's hope things improve on the motoring front as (hopefully) the pandemic ebbs away that we can go back to discussing X or Y new car, etc.

Ironically, HJ himself appears to have either fully retired (not just semi-retirement after selling this website 18 months ago) or not had his contract extended at The Telegraph, as Alex Robbins has seemingly taken over his duties as the Q&A person on the Saturday paper. As many readers commented at the time, not one word of thanks for his service for over 25 years in the paper, and nor were they seeingly thrilled about his replacement either.

A suggestion for the mods - FP

"I cannot see an easy way out of this conundrum unless people on both sides of an debate respect that those on the other should be able to have a view and be able to express it freely, even if that view is completely at odds to theirs."

I agree with Andy. Probably the vast majority of those who post here would also agree.

The problem with discussions on this forum where the topic has taken a political turn has nearly always centred on posts where opinion has been presented as fact, and when the basis of such assertions has been questioned.

I'll say no more for now, but those who have followed some of the contentious threads here will know exactly what I mean.

A suggestion for the mods - sammy1

A suggestion for the mods. Please keep up the good work, it is a pleasure to come on here and see that you have bated away all the spam!

A suggestion for the mods - movilogo

The problem with discussions on this forum where the topic has taken a political turn has nearly always centred on posts where opinion has been presented as fact, and when the basis of such assertions has been questioned.

It happens with all forums. It is more of a problem in forums with few members than forums with very high number of members. The problem starts when people attack the poster rather than argument. Some forums prohibit any political discussion for this reason.

Nowadays all newspapers present opinions as facts. Facts are boring and common people don't want them to read. People prefer "hot" topics which are opinons supporttng their own tought process.

Some say it is better to take one side rather than standing in the middle. For example (in my opinion) Labour party didn't take a strong side in Brexit and people got confused whether they are supporting leave or remain.

In penalty shoot out goalkeeper usually jumps to a side before the shot is taken - because if he waits till later then he may have the option to jump on either side (0% success) compared to 50% success if he jumps on correct side.

Taking a side also helps others to rmember what one stands for. People can't remember well those who stand in the middle :-)

A suggestion for the mods - Xileno

"A suggestion for the mods. Please keep up the good work, it is a pleasure to come on here and see that you have bated away all the spam!"

Thanks! To be fair, the reduction in the spam is predominantly due to the IT people updating the filtering, there is less hitting the forum although still a fair bit that gets hidden but mods can still see. It's not very often that ORB or I have to manually deal with any, maybe a few a day but that's manageable.

I don't think I have much more to add to my post above, some posters have mentioned things better than I could put into words. Thinking back over the last eighteen years or so that I've been here, this forum has always appealed as it's a fairly civilised place, people come here asking for advice and for the vast majority of time get sound advice back. I've always found HJ to be a relaxing place after a day at work, a relative haven of peace. We should all do our bit to keep it that way.

To be honest I prefer the old format of the website, where there were only two forums: Motoring and Technical. Other issues just weren't discussed, although there was the IHAQ (I Have A Question) threads where people could ask non-motoring questions. Anything political or contentious that was not motoring related was just turfed out. The boundaries are a bit more blurred now. However, many forums just aren't as busy now as they were ten to fifteen years ago (some of my other haunts have either declined noticeably in numbers or even closed), maybe HJ needs the non-motoring forum to keep the Backroom viable.

While accepting that politics and Brexit will be a part of motoring, I think it's to everyone's benefit that these contentious issues are kept to a minimum whatever side of the fence we're on. For those that really wish to get deeply involved in these discussions there are more appropriate forums.

A suggestion for the mods - Bromptonaut

Yebbut,

Brexit, whatever you think of it and how it came about is the most significant change in this country since whenever. Entry was a big step but given the incremental changes during our membership leaving is much bigger.

It affects all aspects of our lives from what car we buy to the spares for it and what's in the supermarket.

I'm not clear where the 'more appropriate forums' are.

Edited by Bromptonaut on 07/07/2021 at 07:42

A suggestion for the mods - Engineer Andy

Yebbut,

Brexit, whatever you think of it and how it came about is the most significant change in this country since whenever. Entry was a big step but given the incremental changes during our membership leaving is much bigger.

It affects all aspects of our lives from what car we buy to the spares for it and what's in the supermarket.

I'm not clear where the 'more appropriate forums' are.

They are ones that either don't care that they've lost the specialism about this or that and now (even before the pandemic) mainly 'discuss' partisan politics (often just a bubble of people on one side of the political aisle or virtual slanging matches that achieve nothing) or ones specifically designed to discuss current affaris and/or politics.

There's more than enough of those to go around (including many 'Punch & Judy' political sites), and you appear to frequent at least a couple that you've already told us about over the years. Many members here don't mind discussing political issues occasionally or when it is very important or is related to motoring issues - but not all the time.

The problem comes when people appear to want to only or predominantly talk politics - sometimes I think they are deliberately doing so by starting certain threads or changing their debate to stir up trouble/shut down opinions different to their own. Not everyone (very few people, in fact) has lives that revolve around politics. I think it puts many potential users of this website and forum members off.

Many people (me included) frequent specialist forums to escape the daily grind of current affairs, rather like going on holiday, where the whole point is to distance ourselves from certain things to give us a break and recuperate. I think it does none of us any good to continually go deep into party politics day after day, especially at the moment.

If some people want that, then they need to seriously rethink their priorities in life, including being far more public (i.e. not hiding behind anonymous usernames on forums) and standing for political office and commenting under their real name, if they feel that strongly about political issues. Effectively using forums as campaigning/propaganda tools is not an honourable activity.