MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Citroen » Berlingo » 2002

Citroen Berlingo MOT Results

Registered in 2002
50.5% pass rate
from 3,105 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Berlingo is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 8.9% fail on Stop lamp (67% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 6.9% fail on Direction indicators (77% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 6.9% fail on Flashing type (77% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 5.0% fail on Individual direction indicators (87% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 2.6% fail on Side repeaters (120% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.26% fail on All direction indicators
    • 3.6% fail on Headlamp aim (22% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.13% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamps (45% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp (42% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (30% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Electrical equipment (53% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.58% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.55% fail on Horn (66% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.81% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (78% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.81% fail on Rear fog lamp (78% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.81% fail on Rear fog lamp (78% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.48% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.48% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.064% fail on Rear reflectors (79% better than other 2002 vans)
  • 20% fail on Suspension
    • 7.5% fail on Suspension arms (26% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 4.8% fail on Ball joint (48% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Pins and bushes (59% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.42% fail on Ball joint dust cover (70% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.064% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.064% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 6.2% fail on Anti-roll bars (55% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Linkage ball joints (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.68% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Linkage
      • 0.064% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.064% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (94% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.032% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 4.3% fail on Springs
      • 4.3% fail on Coil springs (140% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 4.3% fail on Coil spring (140% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.032% fail on Mounting
      • 0.032% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.2% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 2.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (71% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.48% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.32% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.097% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.032% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.032% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.39% fail on Axles
      • 0.19% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
      • 0.13% fail on Axle
      • 0.032% fail on Stub axle
      • 0.032% fail on Swivel joints/housing
    • 0.39% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.16% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.16% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.064% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.35% fail on Sub-frames (64% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (75% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.032% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.032% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.19% fail on Shock absorbers (79% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.064% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.032% fail on Suspension rod
      • 0.032% fail on Ball joint
  • 16% fail on Brakes (14% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 7.7% fail on Brake performance (38% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 5.1% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 5.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 2.7% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 2.7% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.032% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.032% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 3.3% fail on Service brake performance (33% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 3.3% fail on Rbt (33% better than other 2002 vans)
          • 2.6% fail on Service brake performance (34% better than other 2002 vans)
          • 0.77% fail on Service brake imbalance (41% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.097% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.064% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
          • 0.032% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (76% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (75% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.48% fail on Parking brake performance (74% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.48% fail on Rbt (73% better than other 2002 vans)
          • 0.39% fail on Parking brake performance (75% better than other 2002 vans)
          • 0.064% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
          • 0.032% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.26% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.5% fail on Load sensing valves (150% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 4.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.3% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.8% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.7% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.032% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.64% fail on Brake linings and pads (52% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.64% fail on Brake pads (50% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.064% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (90% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.032% fail on Linkage
        • 0.032% fail on Brake slack adjuster
    • 0.48% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.32% fail on Pedal
      • 0.16% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.35% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.26% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.13% fail on Valves
      • 0.097% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.032% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.26% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.23% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
      • 0.032% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.19% fail on Parking brake control (70% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Lever (70% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.13% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (72% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.097% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.032% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.097% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.064% fail on Valves (5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.032% fail on Leaks
    • 0.064% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (83% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.064% fail on Additional braking device
  • 14% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 6.8% fail on Transmission (38% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 6.6% fail on Drive shafts (75% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 6.6% fail on Joints (76% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.032% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.16% fail on Prop shafts (86% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.16% fail on Joints
    • 5.4% fail on Exhaust system (62% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure (61% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (62% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.032% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.032% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 0.87% fail on Doors
      • 0.45% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.45% fail on Door condition (110% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.39% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.39% fail on Door condition
      • 0.064% fail on Front passenger's door (86% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.032% fail on Door condition
        • 0.032% fail on Catch
    • 0.84% fail on Chassis (72% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.84% fail on Chassis condition (72% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.42% fail on Seats
      • 0.23% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.19% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.35% fail on Body (64% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Other body component
      • 0.097% fail on Panel (77% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.29% fail on Fuel system (64% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.064% fail on Pipe
    • 0.16% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.16% fail on Carrier
    • 0.097% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.097% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.064% fail on Engine mounting condition
      • 0.032% fail on Bracket
    • 0.032% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.032% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 9.9% fail on Visibility
    • 5.8% fail on Wipers
    • 3.9% fail on Washers
    • 0.61% fail on View to rear
      • 0.61% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.45% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.45% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.13% fail on Bonnet
  • 7.3% fail on Tyres (38% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 4.5% fail on Tread depth (49% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.9% fail on Condition
    • 0.52% fail on Size/type
  • 6.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (41% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 4.0% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Seat belts (31% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Prescribed areas (46% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.97% fail on Condition
    • 0.064% fail on Airbags
      • 0.064% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 5.6% fail on Steering
    • 3.4% fail on Steering linkage components (22% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 3.3% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.097% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.2% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.1% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.097% fail on Operation
    • 1.00% fail on Power steering (61% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.48% fail on Operation (130% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.39% fail on Other components
      • 0.097% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.032% fail on Pump
      • 0.032% fail on Rams
    • 0.097% fail on Steering play
      • 0.097% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.032% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.032% fail on Steering column
  • 3.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (22% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.9% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.9% fail on Compression ignition (36% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.84% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.48% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (100% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.35% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (79% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.13% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.064% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.032% fail on Catalytic converter
          • 0.032% fail on Other emission control equipment
        • 0.064% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.032% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
      • 1.0% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.48% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.29% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.26% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.064% fail on Non catalyst emissions
    • 0.77% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.68% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.064% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.032% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 0.81% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.81% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.26% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.16% fail on Attachment
    • 0.097% fail on Condition
  • 0.032% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.032% fail on Speedometer
  • 0.032% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.032% fail on Belt(s)/padding