Citroen C25 MOT Results

Registered in 1990
55.0% pass rate
from 40 tests in 2021
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1990 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen C25 is unusually good or bad.

  • 38% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (98% worse than other 1990 vans)
    • 13% fail on Headlamps
      • 13% fail on Headlamp
    • 10% fail on Stop lamp
    • 10% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 10% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 10% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 7.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 5.0% fail on Direction indicators
      • 5.0% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.5% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 2.5% fail on Side repeaters
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.5% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.5% fail on Position lamp
    • 2.5% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 2.5% fail on Battery(ies)
  • 20% fail on Suspension
    • 10% fail on Wheel bearings (2 times worse than other 1990 vans)
    • 5.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 5.0% fail on Ball joint dust cover (5 times worse than other 1990 vans)
    • 5.0% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.5% fail on Springs
      • 2.5% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
  • 20% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 13% fail on Transmission (3 times worse than other 1990 vans)
      • 10% fail on Drive shafts (3 times worse than other 1990 vans)
        • 10% fail on Joints (3 times worse than other 1990 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Prop shafts
        • 2.5% fail on Joints
    • 7.5% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.5% fail on Chassis
      • 2.5% fail on Chassis condition
    • 2.5% fail on Bumpers
    • 2.5% fail on Seats
      • 2.5% fail on Driver's seat
  • 15% fail on Brakes
    • 13% fail on Brake performance
      • 7.5% fail on Service brake performance
        • 7.5% fail on Rbt
          • 7.5% fail on Service brake performance
      • 5.0% fail on Brake performance not tested (7 times worse than other 1990 vans)
      • 5.0% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 5.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 5.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 2.5% fail on Service brake performance
    • 5.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 5.0% fail on Load sensing valves (5 times worse than other 1990 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 2.5% fail on Operation
    • 2.5% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 2.5% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.5% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 2.5% fail on Brake discs
  • 15% fail on Visibility
    • 10% fail on Wipers
    • 7.5% fail on Washers
  • 10% fail on Steering
    • 7.5% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 7.5% fail on Track rod end (4 times worse than other 1990 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Steering wheel
  • 5.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 5.0% fail on Seat belts
      • 5.0% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 2.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.5% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.5% fail on Spark ignition
        • 2.5% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 2.5% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 2.5% fail on Engine oil leaks