MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Citroen » Dispatch » 2000

Citroen Dispatch MOT Results

Registered in 2000
46.4% pass rate
from 181 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Dispatch is unusually good or bad.

  • 28% fail on Suspension (47% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 12% fail on Suspension arms (150% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 6.1% fail on Ball joint (120% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 3.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 2.2% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.55% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.55% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 9.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 7.7% fail on Sub-frames (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 4.4% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.8% fail on Sub-frame (15 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Pins and bushes (47 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.7% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.55% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.55% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.55% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.1% fail on Axles (8 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (20 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.1% fail on Springs
      • 1.1% fail on Coil springs
        • 1.1% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.55% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.55% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.55% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.55% fail on Suspension rod
  • 21% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.55% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 5.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.9% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.2% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 1.7% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.55% fail on Switch
      • 0.55% fail on Semaphore
        • 0.55% fail on Arm
    • 3.3% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 2.2% fail on Horn
      • 1.1% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.7% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.1% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.55% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.55% fail on Switch
  • 20% fail on Brakes
    • 8.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 8.3% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.5% fail on Service brake performance
        • 5.5% fail on Rbt
          • 3.9% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.55% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 5.5% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 5.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 3.3% fail on Service brake performance
          • 3.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 5.0% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 2.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.2% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 2.2% fail on Brake discs
      • 1.1% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.1% fail on Brake pads
    • 1.1% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 1.1% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.55% fail on Other components
      • 0.55% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.55% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
    • 0.55% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.55% fail on Servos
    • 0.55% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.55% fail on Lever
  • 20% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 8.3% fail on Exhaust system (110% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 6.6% fail on Transmission
      • 6.6% fail on Drive shafts (110% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 6.6% fail on Joints (120% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 3.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 0.55% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.55% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 1.7% fail on Chassis
      • 1.7% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.55% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.55% fail on Pipe
    • 0.55% fail on Doors
      • 0.55% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.55% fail on Door condition
    • 0.55% fail on Floor
    • 0.55% fail on Undertray
  • 16% fail on Visibility
    • 10% fail on Wipers (90% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 5.5% fail on Washers
    • 2.8% fail on View to rear (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.8% fail on Mirrors (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
  • 10% fail on Steering
    • 5.5% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 5.0% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.55% fail on Drag link end
    • 3.9% fail on Steering gear
      • 3.9% fail on Steering rack
    • 2.2% fail on Power steering
      • 1.7% fail on Operation (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.55% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.55% fail on Other components
  • 6.1% fail on Tyres
    • 3.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.8% fail on Condition
  • 3.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.9% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.3% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.55% fail on Attachment
  • 2.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.2% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.2% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.55% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.55% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
    • 0.55% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.55% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 0.55% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.55% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.55% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.55% fail on Attachment