MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Citroen » Dispatch » 2002

Citroen Dispatch MOT Results

Registered in 2002
46.0% pass rate
from 517 tests in 2021
(15% worse than other 2002 vans)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Dispatch is unusually good or bad.

  • 27% fail on Suspension (38% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 12% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (70% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 11% fail on Suspension arms (87% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 7.7% fail on Ball joint (140% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.9% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.58% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.19% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 4.3% fail on Sub-frames (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Sub-frame (11 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.39% fail on Pins and bushes (31 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Ball joint
    • 4.1% fail on Springs
      • 3.7% fail on Coil springs (100% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 3.5% fail on Coil spring (96% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.19% fail on Mounting
      • 0.39% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.9% fail on Macpherson strut (9 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (15 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.97% fail on Macpherson strut (15 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Axles (5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (15 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Swivel joints/housing
    • 0.97% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.39% fail on Pins and bushes (6 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.19% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.19% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.58% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.19% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.19% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.19% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.19% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
  • 21% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.0% fail on Direction indicators
      • 6.0% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.9% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 2.9% fail on Side repeaters (140% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.39% fail on All direction indicators
    • 5.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 5.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.39% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 5.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.6% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.39% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 3.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.2% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.2% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.58% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (84% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.58% fail on Rear fog lamp (84% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.58% fail on Rear fog lamp (84% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.39% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.39% fail on Switch
    • 0.19% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.19% fail on Position lamp
  • 20% fail on Body, chassis, structure (33% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 8.1% fail on Transmission (66% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 7.7% fail on Drive shafts (100% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 7.7% fail on Joints (110% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.39% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.39% fail on Joints
    • 7.2% fail on Exhaust system (110% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 5.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 4.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 0.39% fail on Sub-frame (7 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.39% fail on Sub-frame condition (8 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 3.5% fail on Chassis
      • 3.5% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.97% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.58% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.19% fail on Hose
      • 0.19% fail on System
    • 0.58% fail on Doors
      • 0.58% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.58% fail on Door condition
    • 0.39% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.39% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.19% fail on Spare wheel condition
      • 0.19% fail on Carrier
    • 0.39% fail on Body
      • 0.39% fail on Other body component
    • 0.19% fail on Towbar
      • 0.19% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.19% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.19% fail on Engine mounting condition
  • 18% fail on Brakes
    • 9.7% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.8% fail on Service brake performance
        • 5.8% fail on Rbt
          • 4.6% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 4.3% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 4.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 3.9% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance (65% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (73% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt (sp) (73% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.58% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.58% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.58% fail on Rbt
          • 0.39% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.19% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 3.9% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.5% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 2.5% fail on Brake discs
      • 1.5% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.5% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.58% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.39% fail on Cable
        • 0.19% fail on Rod
    • 3.7% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 3.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.97% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.97% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.97% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.39% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.39% fail on Lever
    • 0.39% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.19% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.19% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.19% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.19% fail on Pedal
    • 0.19% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.19% fail on Leaks
  • 11% fail on Visibility
    • 7.7% fail on Wipers
    • 2.9% fail on Washers
    • 0.97% fail on View to rear
      • 0.97% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.39% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.39% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.19% fail on Bonnet
  • 9.3% fail on Tyres (76% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 5.6% fail on Tread depth (85% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Condition
    • 0.58% fail on Size/type
  • 6.6% fail on Steering
    • 2.9% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.5% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.39% fail on Ball joint
    • 2.3% fail on Steering gear
      • 2.1% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.19% fail on Operation
    • 1.4% fail on Power steering
      • 0.77% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.58% fail on Operation
      • 0.19% fail on Other components
    • 0.19% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 5.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 5.0% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.7% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.9% fail on Condition (140% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Attachment
      • 0.19% fail on Requirements
    • 0.39% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 4.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.9% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.7% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.7% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 1.2% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.39% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.39% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.19% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
      • 0.19% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.19% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 0.97% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.97% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 0.97% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.97% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.58% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.39% fail on Attachment
    • 0.19% fail on Condition
  • 0.39% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.39% fail on Speedometer (5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
  • 0.19% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.19% fail on Anchorages