MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Citroen » Nemo » 2010

Citroen Nemo MOT Results

Registered in 2010
55.9% pass rate
from 2,884 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Nemo is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Suspension
    • 8.5% fail on Springs (76% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 8.5% fail on Coil springs (180% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 8.5% fail on Coil spring (180% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.035% fail on Mounting
    • 2.9% fail on Anti-roll bars (53% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage ball joints (44% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.94% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.31% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.24% fail on Ball joint (63% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Linkage
      • 0.035% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.035% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 2.5% fail on Suspension arms (56% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Ball joint (39% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Pins and bushes (82% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Ball joint dust cover (70% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.069% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.035% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.6% fail on Shock absorbers (170% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.94% fail on Macpherson strut (190% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.45% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.42% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (180% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.069% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.55% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (53% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.35% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.10% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.035% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.035% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.17% fail on Wheel bearings (90% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.035% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.035% fail on Suspension rod
  • 14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (26% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Stop lamp (32% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (36% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.7% fail on Individual direction indicators (36% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.49% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.10% fail on All direction indicators
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.21% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamps (30% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp (28% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.069% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.1% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (52% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (52% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (52% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.73% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.35% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.31% fail on Horn
      • 0.069% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.49% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.49% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.31% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.28% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.035% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.035% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 10% fail on Visibility (16% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.3% fail on Washers (26% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.3% fail on Wipers
    • 0.90% fail on Condition of glass (84% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.90% fail on Windscreen (88% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.69% fail on View to rear
      • 0.69% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.24% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.035% fail on Driver's view
  • 9.1% fail on Tyres (48% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.7% fail on Tread depth (53% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.0% fail on Condition (49% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.24% fail on Size/type
  • 6.7% fail on Brakes (55% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Brake performance (69% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Service brake performance (35% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt (35% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.97% fail on Service brake performance (48% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.66% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.035% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.035% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.59% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (89% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.59% fail on Rbt (sp) (89% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.31% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (70% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.28% fail on Rbt (sp) (72% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.24% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.035% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.035% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.10% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.10% fail on Parking brake performance (95% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.10% fail on Rbt (94% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.10% fail on Parking brake performance (94% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Mechanical brake components (47% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Brake linings and pads (50% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Brake pads (51% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.035% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.1% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.1% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.10% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (76% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.10% fail on Lever
    • 1.7% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (160% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Pedal (180% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.59% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (57% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.59% fail on Anti-lock braking system (51% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.38% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.38% fail on Lever
    • 0.14% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.10% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.035% fail on Master cylinder
    • 0.14% fail on Rigid brake pipes (96% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.035% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.035% fail on Servos
    • 0.035% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.035% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.035% fail on Other components
  • 5.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 5.2% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.5% fail on Compression ignition
        • 2.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.90% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (52% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.31% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.035% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.035% fail on Exhaust gas recirculation valve
      • 1.8% fail on Spark ignition (59% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.21% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.21% fail on Emissions not tested (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.49% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.42% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.035% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
      • 0.035% fail on Other leaks
  • 4.3% fail on Body, chassis, structure (46% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Transmission (58% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Drive shafts (53% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Joints (52% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.035% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.035% fail on Joints
    • 1.1% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.45% fail on Doors
      • 0.31% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.31% fail on Door condition
      • 0.069% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.069% fail on Door condition
      • 0.069% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.069% fail on Door condition
    • 0.38% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.24% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.14% fail on Tank
    • 0.17% fail on Integral vehicle structure (77% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (77% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.14% fail on Chassis (70% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Chassis condition (70% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.14% fail on Body (69% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Other body component
      • 0.035% fail on Panel
    • 0.14% fail on Seats
      • 0.10% fail on Passenger's seat
      • 0.035% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.069% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.035% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.035% fail on Carrier
    • 0.035% fail on Floor
    • 0.035% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.035% fail on Boot lid condition
    • 0.035% fail on Cabs
      • 0.035% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 3.2% fail on Steering (40% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Steering linkage components (64% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Track rod end (66% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.069% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.069% fail on Locking devices
      • 0.035% fail on Other components
        • 0.035% fail on Steering linkage
    • 1.0% fail on Power steering (140% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.80% fail on Pipes and hoses (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Operation
      • 0.10% fail on Other components
      • 0.035% fail on Rams
    • 0.66% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.59% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.069% fail on Operation
    • 0.069% fail on Steering play
      • 0.069% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.035% fail on Steering wheel
  • 1.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (57% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.87% fail on Seat belts (44% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.52% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.31% fail on Condition
      • 0.035% fail on Pre-tensioners
    • 0.17% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (80% better than other 2010 vans)
  • 0.55% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.55% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.10% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.069% fail on Attachment
    • 0.035% fail on Condition
  • 0.035% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.035% fail on Anchorages