MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Citroen » Nemo » 2016

Citroen Nemo MOT Results

Registered in 2016
68.2% pass rate
from 1,143 tests in 2021
(16% worse than other 2016 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Nemo is unusually good or bad.

  • 9.8% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 3.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (98% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.17% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.61% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.61% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.52% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.17% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.35% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.35% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.35% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.35% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.35% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.35% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.26% fail on Horn
      • 0.087% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.087% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.087% fail on Position lamp
  • 8.4% fail on Tyres (80% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 4.5% fail on Condition (88% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 4.0% fail on Tread depth (66% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.26% fail on Size/type
  • 8.0% fail on Suspension (78% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 6.5% fail on Springs (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 6.5% fail on Coil springs (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 6.2% fail on Coil spring (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.26% fail on Mounting (29 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.52% fail on Macpherson strut (7 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Pins and bushes (10 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.087% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.52% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.44% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.087% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.35% fail on Suspension arms (72% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.087% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.26% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.087% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.087% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.087% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.17% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.087% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.087% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.087% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 6.8% fail on Visibility
    • 3.4% fail on Washers (52% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 3.3% fail on Wipers
    • 0.44% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.44% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.17% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.17% fail on View to rear
      • 0.17% fail on Mirrors
  • 4.3% fail on Brakes (34% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Mechanical brake components (55% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.79% fail on Brake linings and pads (69% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.70% fail on Brake pads (72% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.087% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.52% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.52% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.087% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.087% fail on Lever
    • 1.4% fail on Brake performance (47% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.70% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.61% fail on Rbt
          • 0.35% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.26% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.087% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.087% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.44% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (73% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.44% fail on Rbt (sp) (73% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.35% fail on Rbt
          • 0.35% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.087% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.087% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.087% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 1.3% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Pedal (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Hand lever (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.52% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.52% fail on Lever
    • 0.17% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.17% fail on Electronic stability control
  • 1.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 1.6% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.2% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.87% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.17% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.087% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.087% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.35% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.35% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.17% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.087% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.087% fail on Other leaks
  • 1.3% fail on Steering
    • 0.70% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.70% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.35% fail on Steering gear (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Operation (23 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.17% fail on Power steering
      • 0.087% fail on Operation
      • 0.087% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.087% fail on Steering play
      • 0.087% fail on Steering rack
  • 1.1% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.35% fail on Transmission
      • 0.26% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.17% fail on Joints (81% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.087% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.087% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.087% fail on Joints
    • 0.26% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.26% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.17% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.17% fail on Doors
      • 0.087% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.087% fail on Door condition
      • 0.087% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.087% fail on Door condition
    • 0.087% fail on Body
      • 0.087% fail on Panel
    • 0.087% fail on Seats
      • 0.087% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 0.35% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.35% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.087% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.087% fail on Attachment