MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » FIAT » Doblo » 2010

FIAT Doblo MOT Results

Registered in 2010
59.9% pass rate
from 2,475 tests in 2021
(11% better than other 2010 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the FIAT Doblo is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Suspension
    • 7.9% fail on Springs (63% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 7.8% fail on Coil springs (160% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 7.7% fail on Coil spring (160% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on Mounting (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.040% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.040% fail on Shackle bracket
    • 5.1% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.2% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.7% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.44% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.44% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.16% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.081% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.081% fail on Pins and bushes (92% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.081% fail on Linkage
      • 0.081% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (86% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.081% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 4.0% fail on Suspension arms (31% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.7% fail on Ball joint (44% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.32% fail on Ball joint dust cover (65% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.081% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.040% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.3% fail on Macpherson strut (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.85% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.36% fail on Pins and bushes (170% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.040% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.040% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.61% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.48% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (59% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.40% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.20% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.040% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.36% fail on Wheel bearings (78% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.24% fail on Axles
      • 0.24% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.20% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.16% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.040% fail on Sub-frame
    • 0.081% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.040% fail on Suspension rod
      • 0.040% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (28% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.48% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.6% fail on Stop lamp (37% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.9% fail on Side repeaters (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.081% fail on All direction indicators
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.9% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.081% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (76% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.69% fail on Horn
      • 0.32% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.040% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.48% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.44% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.040% fail on Reversing lamp switch
    • 0.40% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (82% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.40% fail on Rear fog lamp (82% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.40% fail on Rear fog lamp (82% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.24% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.24% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.24% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.081% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.081% fail on Switch
  • 8.1% fail on Tyres (32% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.3% fail on Condition (63% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.24% fail on Size/type
  • 8.0% fail on Brakes (46% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.5% fail on Brake performance (55% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.1% fail on Rbt
          • 1.5% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.69% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.081% fail on Decelerometer (9 times worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.081% fail on Service brake performance (9 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.081% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.081% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (74% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (73% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.44% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (57% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.44% fail on Rbt (sp) (56% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.36% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.20% fail on Service brake performance (68% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.40% fail on Parking brake performance (79% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.36% fail on Rbt (81% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.32% fail on Parking brake performance (81% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.040% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.040% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.040% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.20% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.5% fail on Mechanical brake components (43% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.4% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.040% fail on Brake drums
      • 1.1% fail on Brake linings and pads (62% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Brake pads (62% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.28% fail on Cable
    • 1.3% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (100% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.89% fail on Pedal (80% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.48% fail on Hand lever (190% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Parking brake control (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Lever (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.61% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (56% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.57% fail on Anti-lock braking system (53% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.040% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.20% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.16% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.040% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.16% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.12% fail on Rigid brake pipes (97% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.040% fail on Hand operated control valves
      • 0.040% fail on Condition
  • 6.7% fail on Visibility (23% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Wipers
    • 2.8% fail on Washers (33% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.48% fail on View to rear
      • 0.48% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.16% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.16% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.040% fail on Bonnet
  • 6.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 5.8% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.5% fail on Compression ignition
        • 2.4% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 2.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.36% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.081% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.040% fail on Pre 01/01/1980 visual
        • 0.040% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.040% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 1.4% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.65% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.61% fail on Catalyst emissions (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.20% fail on Emissions not tested (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.57% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.57% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.040% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 5.9% fail on Body, chassis, structure (25% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.3% fail on Exhaust system (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.81% fail on Transmission (80% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.81% fail on Drive shafts (77% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.73% fail on Joints (79% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.081% fail on Drive shaft
    • 0.57% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.28% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.16% fail on Tank
      • 0.081% fail on Pipe
      • 0.040% fail on System
    • 0.44% fail on Engine mounting (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.40% fail on Engine mounting condition (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.040% fail on Bracket
    • 0.36% fail on Doors
      • 0.20% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.12% fail on Door condition
        • 0.040% fail on Catch
        • 0.040% fail on Hinge
      • 0.081% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.081% fail on Door condition
      • 0.081% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.040% fail on Door condition
        • 0.040% fail on Catch
    • 0.24% fail on Integral vehicle structure (68% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (68% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on Body
      • 0.081% fail on Panel
      • 0.081% fail on Other body component
    • 0.081% fail on Seats
      • 0.081% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.081% fail on Boot lid (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.081% fail on Boot lid condition (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.040% fail on Chassis
      • 0.040% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.040% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.040% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.040% fail on Carrier
    • 0.040% fail on Undertray
  • 1.1% fail on Steering (80% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.48% fail on Steering linkage components (89% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.40% fail on Track rod end (90% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.081% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.36% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.24% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.12% fail on Operation
    • 0.28% fail on Power steering
      • 0.12% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.081% fail on Operation
      • 0.081% fail on Other components
  • 0.93% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (62% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.77% fail on Seat belts (51% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.40% fail on Condition
      • 0.32% fail on Prescribed areas (59% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.040% fail on Attachment
    • 0.16% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (82% better than other 2010 vans)
  • 0.48% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.48% fail on Attachment
  • 0.32% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.32% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review