FIAT Scudo MOT Results

Registered in 2005
49.8% pass rate
from 1,073 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 vans and highlighted areas where the FIAT Scudo is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Suspension (17% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 11% fail on Suspension arms (67% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 6.6% fail on Ball joint (59% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 3.0% fail on Ball joint dust cover (140% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Pins and bushes (69% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Suspension arm
    • 8.9% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (68% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 4.7% fail on Springs
      • 4.7% fail on Coil springs (92% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 4.6% fail on Coil spring (90% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.093% fail on Mounting
    • 2.8% fail on Sub-frames (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Sub-frame (7 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.65% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.37% fail on Pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (10 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.93% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.75% fail on Axles (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.65% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (6 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.093% fail on Stub axle
    • 0.65% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.28% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.19% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.19% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.28% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.28% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  • 20% fail on Body, chassis, structure (51% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 10% fail on Transmission (130% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 10.0% fail on Drive shafts (170% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 10.0% fail on Joints (170% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.28% fail on Joints
    • 7.6% fail on Exhaust system (130% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 3.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 0.47% fail on Sub-frame (11 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.47% fail on Sub-frame condition (12 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Chassis
      • 1.8% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.93% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.65% fail on Pipe (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Hose
      • 0.093% fail on System
    • 0.37% fail on Body
      • 0.28% fail on Other body component
      • 0.093% fail on Panel
    • 0.28% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.28% fail on Doors
      • 0.19% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.19% fail on Door condition
      • 0.093% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.093% fail on Door condition
      • 0.093% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.093% fail on Door condition
    • 0.19% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.19% fail on Carrier
    • 0.19% fail on Load security
      • 0.19% fail on Loading door
    • 0.19% fail on Seats
      • 0.19% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.093% fail on Towbar
      • 0.093% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.093% fail on Passenger compartment
    • 0.093% fail on Undertray
  • 19% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.8% fail on Electrical equipment (150% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 3.8% fail on Horn (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 4.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.28% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.0% fail on Stop lamp (31% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.9% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.9% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.9% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.0% fail on Side repeaters (90% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.37% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.28% fail on Switch (6 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.93% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (69% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.93% fail on Rear fog lamp (69% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.93% fail on Rear fog lamp (69% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.093% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.093% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.093% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.093% fail on Switch
    • 0.093% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 12% fail on Brakes (30% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 6.4% fail on Brake performance (40% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 4.1% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.1% fail on Rbt
          • 3.4% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.093% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 2.4% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 2.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.9% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.75% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.56% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (91% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.56% fail on Rbt (sp) (91% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.37% fail on Parking brake performance (84% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.37% fail on Rbt (84% better than other 2005 vans)
          • 0.37% fail on Parking brake performance (81% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.0% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.2% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.2% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.0% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.0% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.3% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 0.75% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.65% fail on Pedal
      • 0.093% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.75% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (64% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.75% fail on Anti-lock braking system (63% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.19% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.093% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.093% fail on Valves
    • 0.19% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.19% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.093% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.093% fail on Lever
    • 0.093% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.093% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.093% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
  • 9.5% fail on Visibility
    • 5.1% fail on Wipers
    • 3.6% fail on Washers
    • 0.65% fail on View to rear
      • 0.65% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.37% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.28% fail on Windscreen
      • 0.093% fail on Window
    • 0.19% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.093% fail on Driver's view
  • 6.9% fail on Tyres
    • 3.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.4% fail on Condition
  • 5.5% fail on Steering
    • 4.2% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 4.1% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.093% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.0% fail on Power steering
      • 0.75% fail on Pipes and hoses (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Other components
      • 0.093% fail on Operation
    • 0.37% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.37% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.093% fail on Steering column
    • 0.093% fail on Steering play
      • 0.093% fail on Steering rack
  • 4.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.8% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.6% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.4% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 1.3% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.65% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.47% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 0.19% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.19% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 1.0% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.84% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.093% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
      • 0.093% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.093% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.093% fail on Undertray
  • 3.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.3% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.7% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.65% fail on Condition
    • 1.2% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.75% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.75% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.65% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.65% fail on Attachment