MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Ford » Ranger » 2016

Ford Ranger MOT Results

Registered in 2016
79.4% pass rate
from 11,526 tests in 2021
(22% better than other 2016 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 vans and highlighted areas where the Ford Ranger is unusually good or bad.

  • 6.5% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (31% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim (21% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim (19% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.0% fail on Stop lamp (51% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.89% fail on Headlamps (53% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.88% fail on Headlamp (51% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.0087% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.88% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (52% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.86% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.86% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.86% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.80% fail on Direction indicators (44% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.80% fail on Flashing type (44% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.71% fail on Side repeaters (25% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.078% fail on Individual direction indicators (84% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.0087% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.50% fail on Electrical equipment (82% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.39% fail on Trailer electrical socket (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.078% fail on Horn
      • 0.035% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.24% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.24% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.23% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.23% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.13% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.0087% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.0087% fail on Switch
    • 0.0087% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.0087% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 5.9% fail on Suspension (31% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 5.4% fail on Springs (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 4.7% fail on Coil springs (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 4.7% fail on Coil spring (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.75% fail on Leaf springs (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.68% fail on Leaf spring (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.043% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
        • 0.017% fail on Anchor bracket
        • 0.0087% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
        • 0.0087% fail on Spring saddle
      • 0.0087% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.31% fail on Anti-roll bars (73% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Linkage ball joints (70% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.078% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.035% fail on Ball joint (70% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.035% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.026% fail on Linkage
      • 0.0087% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 0.13% fail on Suspension arms (90% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.052% fail on Ball joint dust cover (67% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.043% fail on Pins and bushes (91% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.026% fail on Ball joint (96% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.0087% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.0087% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.11% fail on Shock absorbers (75% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.026% fail on Wheel bearings (90% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.026% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.026% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.026% fail on Other suspension component (83% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.026% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.0087% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 5.1% fail on Brakes (22% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Mechanical brake components (37% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Brake linings and pads (28% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 1.8% fail on Brake pads (28% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.026% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.29% fail on Brake discs and drums (65% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.27% fail on Brake discs (67% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.017% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.0087% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.0087% fail on Lever
    • 1.9% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Anti-lock braking system (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.88% fail on Electronic stability control (190% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.017% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.99% fail on Brake performance (62% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.59% fail on Service brake performance (33% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.56% fail on Rbt (36% better than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.42% fail on Service brake performance (39% better than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.16% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.035% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.017% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.017% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.0087% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.0087% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.38% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.36% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.30% fail on Service brake imbalance (140% worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.10% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.017% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
        • 0.0087% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.0087% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.22% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (87% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.20% fail on Rbt (sp) (88% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.017% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.087% fail on Parking brake performance (82% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.087% fail on Rbt (82% better than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.087% fail on Parking brake performance (78% better than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.0087% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.069% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.28% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.23% fail on Pedal
      • 0.043% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.12% fail on Parking brake control (62% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Lever (62% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.10% fail on Hydraulic systems (130% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.078% fail on Brake fluid (190% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.026% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.095% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.052% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.043% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.0087% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.043% fail on Rigid brake pipes (87% better than other 2016 vans)
  • 2.5% fail on Tyres (46% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Tread depth (30% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.96% fail on Condition (60% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.017% fail on Size/type (85% better than other 2016 vans)
  • 1.9% fail on Visibility (65% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Washers (50% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.61% fail on Wipers (76% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.087% fail on Condition of glass (79% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.087% fail on Windscreen (79% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.069% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.026% fail on View to rear (93% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.026% fail on Mirrors (93% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.0087% fail on Driver's view
  • 1.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (39% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Exhaust emissions (39% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.00% fail on Compression ignition (37% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.74% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (37% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.17% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (43% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.069% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.017% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.017% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
      • 0.25% fail on Spark ignition (47% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.23% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (48% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.017% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.095% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.078% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.026% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 1.3% fail on Body, chassis, structure (40% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.33% fail on Transmission (67% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Drive shafts (78% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.19% fail on Joints (79% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.0087% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.14% fail on Prop shafts (110% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.13% fail on Joints (170% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.0087% fail on Prop shaft
    • 0.31% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.16% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.16% fail on Doors
      • 0.087% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.078% fail on Door condition
        • 0.0087% fail on Catch
      • 0.052% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.052% fail on Door condition
      • 0.017% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.0087% fail on Door condition
        • 0.0087% fail on Catch
    • 0.10% fail on Body (68% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.087% fail on Other body component (67% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.017% fail on Panel
    • 0.061% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.052% fail on Spare wheel condition (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.0087% fail on Carrier
    • 0.052% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.035% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.0087% fail on Tank
      • 0.0087% fail on System
    • 0.043% fail on Seats
      • 0.035% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.0087% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.026% fail on Towbar
      • 0.017% fail on Other towbar components
      • 0.0087% fail on Coupling
    • 0.017% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.0087% fail on Boot lid condition
      • 0.0087% fail on Other boot lid component
    • 0.0087% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.0087% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.0087% fail on Load security
      • 0.0087% fail on Loading door
    • 0.0087% fail on Undertray
  • 0.56% fail on Identification of the vehicle (76% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.56% fail on Registration plates (77% worse than other 2016 vans)
  • 0.36% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (60% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.28% fail on Seat belts (53% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Condition (60% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.061% fail on Requirements
    • 0.087% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (72% better than other 2016 vans)
  • 0.26% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.23% fail on Attachment (110% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.026% fail on Condition
  • 0.13% fail on Steering (87% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.11% fail on Steering linkage components (85% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.095% fail on Track rod end (87% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.0087% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.0087% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.0087% fail on Steering column
    • 0.0087% fail on Electronic power steering