MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Isuzu » Grafter » 2010

Isuzu Grafter MOT Results

Registered in 2010
61.0% pass rate
from 59 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Isuzu Grafter is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 8.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 8.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 8.5% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 8.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 8.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 6.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 3.4% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 3.4% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 3.4% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.7% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 1.7% fail on Horn
    • 1.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.7% fail on Position lamp
    • 1.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.7% fail on Side repeaters
  • 19% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 19% fail on Exhaust emissions (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 15% fail on Compression ignition (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 12% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 3.4% fail on Emissions not tested (7 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.4% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.7% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 1.7% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 15% fail on Brakes
    • 12% fail on Brake performance
      • 10% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 10% fail on Rbt (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 8.5% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 3.4% fail on Service brake imbalance (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.4% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 3.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 3.4% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.7% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 1.7% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 1.7% fail on Pedal
    • 1.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.7% fail on Load sensing valves
  • 15% fail on Visibility
    • 6.8% fail on Wipers
    • 6.8% fail on Washers
    • 3.4% fail on View to rear
      • 3.4% fail on Mirrors
  • 10% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 6.8% fail on Exhaust system (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.1% fail on Fuel system (9 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.4% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (13 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Tank
  • 8.5% fail on Suspension
    • 3.4% fail on Axles (39 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.4% fail on King pins (853 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Springs
      • 1.7% fail on Leaf springs
        • 1.7% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
      • 1.7% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.7% fail on Wheel bearings
  • 5.1% fail on Steering
    • 1.7% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.7% fail on Drag link end
    • 1.7% fail on Power steering
      • 1.7% fail on Operation
    • 1.7% fail on Steering play
      • 1.7% fail on Steering box
  • 5.1% fail on Tyres
    • 3.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.7% fail on Condition
  • 1.7% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.7% fail on Registration plates
  • 1.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.7% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.7% fail on Requirements
      • 1.7% fail on Condition
  • 1.7% fail on Road Wheels
    • 1.7% fail on Attachment