Isuzu NKR MOT Results

Registered in 2004
60.2% pass rate
from 118 tests in 2021
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 vans and highlighted areas where the Isuzu NKR is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 8.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 7.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (150% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 7.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (150% worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 7.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (150% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 5.9% fail on Direction indicators
      • 5.9% fail on Flashing type
        • 4.2% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 1.7% fail on All direction indicators (6 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 5.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.2% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.85% fail on Dipswitch
      • 0.85% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 3.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.7% fail on Position lamp
    • 1.7% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.85% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.85% fail on Battery(ies)
  • 19% fail on Brakes
    • 14% fail on Brake performance
      • 7.6% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 7.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 6.8% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
          • 0.85% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 5.9% fail on Service brake performance
        • 5.1% fail on Rbt
          • 4.2% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.85% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.85% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.85% fail on Service brake performance
      • 3.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.85% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.85% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.5% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.5% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.5% fail on Brake pads
    • 1.7% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 1.7% fail on Pedal
    • 1.7% fail on Parking brake control
      • 1.7% fail on Lever
    • 1.7% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 14% fail on Visibility
    • 11% fail on Washers (130% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Wipers
    • 1.7% fail on View to rear
      • 1.7% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.85% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.85% fail on Windscreen
  • 7.6% fail on Tyres
    • 4.2% fail on Condition
    • 4.2% fail on Tread depth
  • 6.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.85% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.85% fail on Tank
      • 0.85% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.85% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.85% fail on Transmission
      • 0.85% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.85% fail on Prop shaft
    • 0.85% fail on Cabs
      • 0.85% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 5.9% fail on Suspension (72% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 4.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.5% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.85% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.85% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.7% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 5.1% fail on Identification of the vehicle (4 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 5.1% fail on Registration plates (4 times worse than other 2004 vans)
  • 4.2% fail on Steering
    • 4.2% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 4.2% fail on Track rod end
  • 1.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 1.7% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.7% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.85% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.85% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 0.85% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.85% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.85% fail on Condition