MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Isuzu » NKR » 2009

Isuzu NKR MOT Results

Registered in 2009
46.2% pass rate
from 65 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 vans and highlighted areas where the Isuzu NKR is unusually good or bad.

  • 32% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (67% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 12% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 12% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 12% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 7.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 7.7% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 6.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.6% fail on Position lamps (9 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 4.6% fail on Position lamp (9 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 4.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 3.1% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.1% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.1% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 3.1% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.5% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 1.5% fail on Horn
    • 1.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp
  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 9.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 6.2% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.6% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.6% fail on Rbt
          • 3.1% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.5% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.5% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.5% fail on Service brake performance
    • 1.5% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.5% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.5% fail on Brake pads
  • 14% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 14% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 14% fail on Compression ignition (160% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 12% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 12% fail on Visibility
    • 7.7% fail on Washers
    • 4.6% fail on Wipers
  • 11% fail on Suspension
    • 4.6% fail on Axles (55 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 4.6% fail on King pins (936 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.1% fail on Springs
      • 3.1% fail on Leaf springs
        • 1.5% fail on Leaf spring
        • 1.5% fail on Shackle bracket
    • 3.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.5% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.5% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 1.5% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.5% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
  • 11% fail on Tyres
    • 7.7% fail on Condition
    • 4.6% fail on Tread depth
  • 9.2% fail on Steering
    • 6.2% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 3.1% fail on Ball joint (13 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 3.1% fail on Track rod end
    • 3.1% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.5% fail on Operation
      • 1.5% fail on Steering rack
    • 1.5% fail on Steering play
      • 1.5% fail on Steering box
  • 6.2% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 6.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.1% fail on Fuel system
      • 3.1% fail on Tank (22 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Body
      • 1.5% fail on Mounting fixings
  • 3.1% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 3.1% fail on Registration plates
  • 1.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.5% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp