MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Mercedes-Benz » Sprinter » 2005

Mercedes-Benz Sprinter MOT Results

Registered in 2005
56.6% pass rate
from 3,956 tests in 2021
(10% better than other 2005 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 vans and highlighted areas where the Mercedes-Benz Sprinter is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (16% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 6.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (63% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 6.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 6.0% fail on Headlamps (47% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 5.7% fail on Headlamp (51% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.051% fail on Dipswitch
    • 5.6% fail on Direction indicators (56% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 5.6% fail on Flashing type (56% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 3.5% fail on Individual direction indicators (39% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.9% fail on Side repeaters (82% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.48% fail on All direction indicators (100% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.10% fail on Switch
    • 3.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 3.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 3.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.35% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.3% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.2% fail on Horn
      • 1.0% fail on Battery(ies) (72% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.051% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.68% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.68% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.48% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.48% fail on Switch
    • 0.40% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.10% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.10% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
      • 0.025% fail on Main beam tell-tale
    • 0.025% fail on Outline marker lamps
      • 0.025% fail on Outline marker lamp
    • 0.025% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.025% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 22% fail on Brakes (24% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 17% fail on Brake performance (58% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 14% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (130% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 14% fail on Rbt (sp) (140% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.10% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
        • 0.051% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 2.9% fail on Service brake performance (27% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 2.9% fail on Rbt (26% better than other 2005 vans)
          • 2.5% fail on Service brake performance (23% better than other 2005 vans)
          • 0.53% fail on Service brake imbalance (48% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.025% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.025% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.4% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 2.3% fail on Rbt
          • 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.33% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
          • 0.25% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.10% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.076% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.025% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.025% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.025% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 2.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 2.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.96% fail on Service brake imbalance (38% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.43% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 4.2% fail on Mechanical brake components (35% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Brake linings and pads (33% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 2.2% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.076% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.8% fail on Brake discs and drums (48% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Brake discs (47% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.076% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.66% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.43% fail on Cable
        • 0.13% fail on Lever
        • 0.051% fail on Linkage
        • 0.025% fail on Relay lever
        • 0.025% fail on Pivot
        • 0.025% fail on Brake slack adjuster
    • 2.1% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 2.1% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.81% fail on Electronic stability control (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.025% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 1.3% fail on Parking brake control (140% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Lever (140% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.99% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 0.58% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.40% fail on Pedal
      • 0.18% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.33% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.20% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.18% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.13% fail on Other braking system component
        • 0.051% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
      • 0.025% fail on Other components
    • 0.18% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.10% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.051% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
      • 0.025% fail on Air brake cylinder/actuator
    • 0.15% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.10% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.025% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.025% fail on Valves
    • 0.051% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.025% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
      • 0.025% fail on Leaks
      • 0.025% fail on Servos
  • 14% fail on Suspension (30% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 6.1% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.3% fail on Pins and bushes (170% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 3.1% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.53% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Linkage
      • 0.20% fail on Linkage ball joints (89% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.10% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.051% fail on Ball joint (90% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 4.6% fail on Suspension arms (32% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 4.0% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.63% fail on Ball joint dust cover (48% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.051% fail on Pins and bushes (97% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (30% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Springs (58% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.48% fail on Leaf spring
        • 0.28% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.076% fail on Anchor bracket
        • 0.076% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
        • 0.076% fail on Spring saddle (7 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.076% fail on Shackle bracket
        • 0.025% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
      • 0.58% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.025% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.025% fail on Coil spring
    • 1.0% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.58% fail on Wheel bearings (70% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.43% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.28% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.076% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.025% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.025% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.025% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.28% fail on Sub-frames (62% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (58% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.051% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.025% fail on Sub-frame
    • 0.051% fail on Axles
      • 0.025% fail on Axle
      • 0.025% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.051% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.025% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.025% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.025% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.025% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.025% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension
      • 0.025% fail on Bellows
  • 9.5% fail on Body, chassis, structure (30% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 0.076% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.076% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 2.0% fail on Body (150% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Panel (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.76% fail on Other body component (77% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Body condition (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.076% fail on Mounting fixings
    • 1.6% fail on Chassis
      • 1.6% fail on Chassis condition
      • 0.025% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 0.53% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.18% fail on Tank
      • 0.18% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.10% fail on Pipe
      • 0.051% fail on System
      • 0.025% fail on Hose
    • 0.53% fail on Doors
      • 0.25% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.23% fail on Door condition
        • 0.025% fail on Catch
      • 0.18% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.15% fail on Door condition
        • 0.025% fail on Catch
      • 0.13% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.10% fail on Door condition
        • 0.025% fail on Hinge
    • 0.33% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.28% fail on Seats
      • 0.15% fail on Passenger's seat
      • 0.13% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.25% fail on Cabs
      • 0.18% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.076% fail on Steps
    • 0.18% fail on Transmission (96% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Drive shafts (97% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.10% fail on Joints (97% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.051% fail on Prop shafts (94% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.051% fail on Prop shaft (88% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.025% fail on Halfshafts
    • 0.15% fail on Load security
      • 0.15% fail on Loading door (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.13% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.076% fail on Carrier
      • 0.051% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.13% fail on Towbar
      • 0.076% fail on Other towbar components
      • 0.025% fail on Towbar condition
      • 0.025% fail on Vehicle structure
  • 9.4% fail on Visibility
    • 5.3% fail on Wipers
    • 3.2% fail on Washers (32% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Condition of glass (130% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Windscreen (140% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.81% fail on View to rear
      • 0.78% fail on Mirrors
      • 0.025% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.051% fail on Bonnet
  • 4.3% fail on Steering (33% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Steering linkage components (40% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Track rod end (39% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Ball joint (68% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Steering arm (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.051% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.025% fail on Locking devices
    • 1.0% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.0% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.025% fail on Operation
      • 0.025% fail on Steering box
    • 0.40% fail on Steering play
      • 0.40% fail on Steering rack (100% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.35% fail on Power steering
      • 0.20% fail on Operation
      • 0.13% fail on Other components
      • 0.051% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.076% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.051% fail on Universal joint
      • 0.025% fail on Flexible coupling
    • 0.025% fail on Steering wheel
  • 3.9% fail on Tyres (35% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Tread depth (33% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Condition (41% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.18% fail on Size/type
  • 3.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.5% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.2% fail on Compression ignition
        • 2.2% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.61% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.13% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.13% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.076% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (81% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.051% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.025% fail on Catalytic converter
          • 0.025% fail on Other emission control equipment
        • 0.025% fail on Pre 01/01/1980 visual
        • 0.025% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 0.30% fail on Spark ignition (57% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.13% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (72% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.025% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.025% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.38% fail on Fluid leaks (55% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Engine oil leaks (75% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.076% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
      • 0.025% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 2.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (52% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Seat belts (28% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Prescribed areas (41% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.71% fail on Condition
      • 0.10% fail on Attachment
      • 0.10% fail on Requirements
    • 0.28% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (85% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.025% fail on Airbags
      • 0.025% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 1.3% fail on Identification of the vehicle (64% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plates (62% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.025% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.20% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.20% fail on Attachment
  • 0.025% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.025% fail on Speedometer
  • 0.025% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.025% fail on Anchorages