Nissan D22 MOT Results
Registered in 200050.0% pass rate
from 36 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 vans and highlighted areas where the Nissan D22 is unusually good or bad.
-
31% fail on
Brakes
-
28% fail on
Brake performance
(130% worse than other 2000 vans)
-
14% fail on
Service brake performance
-
14% fail on
Rbt
- 14% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 2.8% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
14% fail on
Rbt
-
8.3% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
8.3% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 5.6% fail on Service brake performance
- 2.8% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
8.3% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
5.6% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 5.6% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (43 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 2.8% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
2.8% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
2.8% fail on
Rbt
- 2.8% fail on Parking brake performance
-
2.8% fail on
Rbt
-
14% fail on
Service brake performance
- 11% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
2.8% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 2.8% fail on Hand lever
-
2.8% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 2.8% fail on Valves
-
2.8% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
-
2.8% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 2.8% fail on Other braking system component
-
2.8% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
28% fail on
Brake performance
(130% worse than other 2000 vans)
-
28% fail on
Suspension
-
14% fail on
Suspension arms
- 5.6% fail on Ball joint
- 5.6% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 2.8% fail on Suspension arm
- 11% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
5.6% fail on
Springs
-
5.6% fail on
Leaf springs
(6 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 5.6% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (22 times worse than other 2000 vans)
-
5.6% fail on
Leaf springs
(6 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 2.8% fail on Wheel bearings
-
2.8% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 2.8% fail on Pins and bushes
-
14% fail on
Suspension arms
-
22% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
8.3% fail on
Headlamps
- 8.3% fail on Headlamp
-
5.6% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 2.8% fail on Battery(ies)
- 2.8% fail on Horn
-
2.8% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim
- 2.8% fail on Stop lamp
-
2.8% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.8% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.8% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
2.8% fail on
Flashing type
-
2.8% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
2.8% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 2.8% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
2.8% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 2.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
8.3% fail on
Headlamps
-
14% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
5.6% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 5.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
2.8% fail on
Chassis
- 2.8% fail on Chassis condition
- 2.8% fail on Exhaust system
-
2.8% fail on
Transmission
-
2.8% fail on
Drive shafts
- 2.8% fail on Joints
-
2.8% fail on
Prop shafts
- 2.8% fail on Flexible couplings
-
2.8% fail on
Drive shafts
-
2.8% fail on
Body
- 2.8% fail on Other body component
-
2.8% fail on
Doors
-
2.8% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 2.8% fail on Door condition
-
2.8% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
5.6% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
-
11% fail on
Steering
-
11% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 11% fail on Track rod end
-
11% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
11% fail on
Visibility
- 8.3% fail on Wipers
- 2.8% fail on Washers
-
8.3% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
8.3% fail on
Seat belts
- 5.6% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 2.8% fail on Prescribed areas
-
8.3% fail on
Seat belts
-
5.6% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
5.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
5.6% fail on
Compression ignition
- 5.6% fail on Emissions not tested (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
-
5.6% fail on
Compression ignition
-
5.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
5.6% fail on
Tyres
- 5.6% fail on Tread depth
-
2.8% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 2.8% fail on Registration plates