MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Nissan » D22 » 2004

Nissan D22 MOT Results

Registered in 2004
59.6% pass rate
from 470 tests in 2021
(18% better than other 2004 vans)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 vans and highlighted areas where the Nissan D22 is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Brakes
    • 10% fail on Brake performance
      • 7.2% fail on Service brake performance (67% worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 7.2% fail on Rbt (71% worse than other 2004 vans)
          • 7.2% fail on Service brake performance (110% worse than other 2004 vans)
          • 0.43% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 4.0% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 3.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 2.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 2.1% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.21% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 2.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (66% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 1.9% fail on Rbt (sp) (69% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.21% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.43% fail on Parking brake performance (83% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.43% fail on Rbt (82% better than other 2004 vans)
          • 0.43% fail on Parking brake performance (80% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 6.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.5% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.85% fail on Pedal
      • 0.64% fail on Hand lever
    • 1.1% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 1.1% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.1% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.85% fail on Mechanical brake components (72% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.43% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.43% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.43% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.21% fail on Rod
        • 0.21% fail on Lever
    • 0.64% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.64% fail on Lever
    • 0.43% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.43% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.43% fail on Other braking system component
    • 0.21% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.21% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.21% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.21% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 16% fail on Suspension (25% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 7.7% fail on Suspension arms
      • 5.7% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.85% fail on Suspension arm (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.64% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 4.9% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 3.2% fail on Springs
      • 2.1% fail on Leaf springs (160% worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.43% fail on Leaf spring
        • 0.21% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
      • 1.3% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.3% fail on Anti-roll bars (62% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.85% fail on Linkage
      • 0.85% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.64% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 1.3% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.1% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.85% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.21% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.43% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.21% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.21% fail on Sub-frame
  • 15% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (29% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 4.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 2.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 2.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 2.6% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.3% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.64% fail on Trailer electrical socket (4 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.64% fail on Electrical wiring (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.85% fail on Headlamp aim (80% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.64% fail on Headlamp aim (83% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.85% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.64% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.21% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.85% fail on Direction indicators (76% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.85% fail on Flashing type (76% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.64% fail on Individual direction indicators (73% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.21% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.64% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.43% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.43% fail on Switch
    • 0.21% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.21% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 14% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 6.6% fail on Exhaust system (110% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 4.5% fail on Transmission
      • 3.2% fail on Prop shafts (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Prop shaft (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.64% fail on Joints
        • 0.64% fail on Flexible couplings (9 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.21% fail on Bearing housing
      • 1.3% fail on Drive shafts (67% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Joints (67% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 2.3% fail on Chassis
      • 2.3% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.3% fail on Body
      • 0.64% fail on Other body component
      • 0.43% fail on Body condition
      • 0.21% fail on Mounting fixings
    • 0.64% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.43% fail on Tank
      • 0.21% fail on Hose
    • 0.43% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.21% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.21% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.21% fail on Towbar
      • 0.21% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.21% fail on Seats
      • 0.21% fail on Driver's seat
  • 9.6% fail on Visibility
    • 4.9% fail on Washers
    • 4.5% fail on Wipers
    • 0.43% fail on View to rear
      • 0.43% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.21% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.21% fail on Windscreen
  • 4.5% fail on Steering
    • 3.0% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.5% fail on Track rod end (67% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Intermediate drop arm (17 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Other components
        • 0.21% fail on Steering linkage
      • 0.21% fail on Locking devices
    • 1.1% fail on Power steering
      • 0.64% fail on Operation
      • 0.43% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.21% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.21% fail on Steering box
    • 0.21% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.21% fail on Steering play
      • 0.21% fail on Steering box
  • 3.6% fail on Tyres
    • 2.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.5% fail on Condition
    • 0.21% fail on Size/type
  • 3.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.6% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.1% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.5% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.43% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.21% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.21% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 0.43% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.21% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.21% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 1.3% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.3% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.21% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 1.3% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plates
  • 1.1% fail on Road Wheels
    • 1.1% fail on Attachment (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
  • 0.43% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (91% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.43% fail on Seat belts (86% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.21% fail on Condition
  • 0.21% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.21% fail on Speedometer