Nissan Navara MOT Results

Registered in 2005
55.6% pass rate
from 2,590 tests in 2021
(6.9% better than other 2005 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 vans and highlighted areas where the Nissan Navara is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Body, chassis, structure (35% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 7.2% fail on Chassis (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 7.0% fail on Chassis condition (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Strengthening plate (9 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 5.3% fail on Exhaust system (63% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 4.1% fail on Transmission
      • 2.4% fail on Drive shafts (36% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 2.3% fail on Joints (36% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.077% fail on Drive shaft
      • 1.9% fail on Prop shafts (130% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Joints (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.58% fail on Prop shaft
        • 0.039% fail on Bearing housing
    • 1.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.6% fail on Fuel system (130% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Tank (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Pipe
      • 0.039% fail on Hose
      • 0.039% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.039% fail on System
    • 0.89% fail on Body
      • 0.50% fail on Mounting fixings (7 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Panel
      • 0.12% fail on Body condition
      • 0.12% fail on Other body component (73% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.77% fail on Cabs (160% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.58% fail on Prescribed areas (130% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Mounting fixings (26 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.039% fail on Steps
    • 0.42% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.42% fail on Spare wheel (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.39% fail on Spare wheel condition (8 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.039% fail on Carrier
    • 0.42% fail on Doors
      • 0.23% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.23% fail on Door condition
      • 0.15% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.15% fail on Door condition
      • 0.039% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.039% fail on Door condition
    • 0.23% fail on Seats
      • 0.19% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.039% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.077% fail on Towbar
      • 0.077% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.039% fail on Load security
      • 0.039% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.039% fail on Tailgate condition
  • 17% fail on Suspension (15% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 5.8% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 5.3% fail on Suspension arms (21% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 4.2% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.73% fail on Suspension arm (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.50% fail on Ball joint dust cover (59% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.077% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.039% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 3.4% fail on Wheel bearings (74% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.1% fail on Anti-roll bars (49% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.97% fail on Linkage ball joints (49% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.42% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.42% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (63% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.31% fail on Linkage
      • 0.23% fail on Pins and bushes (81% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.077% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.077% fail on Ball joint dust cover (85% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.039% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 2.5% fail on Springs (34% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (140% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.62% fail on Leaf spring
        • 0.15% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
        • 0.12% fail on Anchor bracket
        • 0.077% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
        • 0.039% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
        • 0.039% fail on Shackle bracket
      • 0.15% fail on Coil springs (94% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Coil spring (94% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.039% fail on Bonded suspension units
        • 0.039% fail on Attachment bracket
    • 0.69% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.58% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.077% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.039% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.62% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.077% fail on Sub-frames (89% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.039% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.039% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.039% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.039% fail on Ball joint
  • 17% fail on Brakes
    • 11% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.3% fail on Service brake performance (58% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 6.1% fail on Rbt (56% worse than other 2005 vans)
          • 5.3% fail on Service brake performance (66% worse than other 2005 vans)
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.077% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (6 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.19% fail on Decelerometer (7 times worse than other 2005 vans)
          • 0.19% fail on Service brake performance (7 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.077% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.039% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.039% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 5.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (100% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 5.0% fail on Rbt (sp) (93% worse than other 2005 vans)
          • 3.1% fail on Service brake imbalance (98% worse than other 2005 vans)
          • 2.7% fail on Service brake performance (91% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.23% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (10 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 3.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (48% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 2.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (60% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.73% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (7 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.039% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
      • 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance (54% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.0% fail on Rbt (54% better than other 2005 vans)
          • 0.93% fail on Parking brake performance (54% better than other 2005 vans)
          • 0.077% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.039% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.039% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.039% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.73% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.9% fail on Mechanical brake components (40% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.1% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.15% fail on Brake linings (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.42% fail on Brake discs and drums (66% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.31% fail on Brake discs (74% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.31% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.077% fail on Cable (81% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.077% fail on Pivot (5 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.039% fail on Lever
        • 0.039% fail on Linkage
        • 0.039% fail on Relay lever
        • 0.039% fail on Clevis joint
    • 1.6% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (160% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Pedal (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Hand lever
    • 1.6% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.6% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 1.2% fail on Load sensing valves (71% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.35% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.35% fail on Lever
    • 0.35% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.31% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
      • 0.039% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.15% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.15% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.15% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.15% fail on Other braking system component
    • 0.12% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.077% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.039% fail on Servos
    • 0.039% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.039% fail on Leaks
  • 17% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (20% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 4.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 4.2% fail on Stop lamp (28% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.9% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.039% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim (34% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim (31% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.4% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 2.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 2.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.4% fail on Direction indicators (60% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Flashing type (60% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.81% fail on Individual direction indicators (68% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.66% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.039% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.4% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.69% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.39% fail on Horn (67% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.15% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.54% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.54% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.35% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.35% fail on Switch
    • 0.19% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.12% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
      • 0.077% fail on Main beam tell-tale
    • 0.039% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 9.7% fail on Visibility
    • 6.1% fail on Washers (33% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 4.1% fail on Wipers (23% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.27% fail on View to rear (61% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Mirrors (60% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.15% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.15% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.077% fail on Bonnet
  • 5.8% fail on Steering
    • 4.3% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 3.7% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.27% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.19% fail on Locking devices (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Intermediate drop arm
      • 0.039% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.89% fail on Power steering
      • 0.54% fail on Operation (130% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Other components
      • 0.077% fail on Pump
      • 0.039% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.42% fail on Steering gear (63% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Steering rack (82% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Operation
      • 0.12% fail on Steering box
    • 0.19% fail on Steering play
      • 0.19% fail on Steering box (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.039% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.039% fail on Steering column
  • 4.4% fail on Tyres (28% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.97% fail on Condition (63% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.077% fail on Size/type
  • 3.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (35% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.2% fail on Condition
      • 0.93% fail on Prescribed areas (53% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Requirements
      • 0.039% fail on Attachment
    • 0.77% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (59% better than other 2005 vans)
  • 2.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (42% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Exhaust emissions (44% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Compression ignition (36% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.89% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (50% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.89% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.12% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.077% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.039% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.039% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 0.19% fail on Spark ignition (73% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.077% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.077% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (83% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.039% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.50% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.23% fail on Engine oil leaks (67% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
      • 0.077% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.077% fail on Other leaks
  • 1.3% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plates
  • 1.0% fail on Road Wheels (160% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Attachment (200% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.039% fail on Condition
  • 0.039% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.039% fail on Speedometer