Nissan NV200 MOT Results

Registered in 2015
61.8% pass rate
from 4,239 tests in 2021
(26% worse than other 2015 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2015 vans and highlighted areas where the Nissan NV200 is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (66% worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 5.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (160% worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 4.7% fail on Headlamps (110% worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 4.6% fail on Headlamp (110% worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.094% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 4.0% fail on Stop lamp (67% worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 3.3% fail on Direction indicators (100% worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 3.3% fail on Flashing type (100% worse than other 2015 vans)
        • 2.8% fail on Individual direction indicators (3 times worse than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.42% fail on All direction indicators (9 times worse than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.094% fail on Side repeaters (90% better than other 2015 vans)
    • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.47% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (91% worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.071% fail on Switch (16 times worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.64% fail on Position lamps (150% worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.64% fail on Position lamp (150% worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.42% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.40% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.024% fail on Reversing lamp switch
    • 0.42% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.19% fail on Battery(ies) (4 times worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Horn
      • 0.024% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.024% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.26% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.024% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.024% fail on Switch
  • 13% fail on Suspension (97% worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 6.6% fail on Suspension arms (2 times worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 5.9% fail on Ball joint (5 times worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.59% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.31% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 5.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (160% worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 3.6% fail on Linkage ball joints (2 times worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.31% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.17% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.12% fail on Linkage
      • 0.094% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.047% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.024% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 2.5% fail on Springs
      • 2.1% fail on Coil springs
        • 2.1% fail on Coil spring
      • 0.40% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.26% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (12 times worse than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.094% fail on Leaf spring
        • 0.047% fail on Anchor pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.024% fail on Spring saddle
    • 0.64% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.40% fail on Other suspension component (110% worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.40% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.094% fail on Shock absorbers (82% better than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.071% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.047% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.024% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.047% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.047% fail on Ball joint (16 times worse than other 2015 vans)
  • 7.1% fail on Tyres (45% worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 4.2% fail on Tread depth (57% worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 3.3% fail on Condition (37% worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.17% fail on Size/type
  • 7.1% fail on Visibility (25% worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 4.7% fail on Wipers (86% worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Washers
    • 0.73% fail on View to rear (62% worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.73% fail on Mirrors (66% worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.17% fail on Condition of glass (63% better than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Windscreen (63% better than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.071% fail on Bonnet
  • 6.8% fail on Brakes (13% better than other 2015 vans)
    • 3.1% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.8% fail on Service brake performance (59% worse than other 2015 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt (51% worse than other 2015 vans)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.59% fail on Service brake imbalance (100% worse than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on Plate brake tester (4 times worse than other 2015 vans)
          • 0.094% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (4 times worse than other 2015 vans)
          • 0.024% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.87% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (59% better than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.87% fail on Rbt (sp) (58% better than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.71% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (100% worse than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.71% fail on Rbt (sp) (110% worse than other 2015 vans)
          • 0.68% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2015 vans)
          • 0.17% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.71% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.66% fail on Rbt
          • 0.57% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.071% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.024% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.047% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.047% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.047% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.1% fail on Mechanical brake components (39% better than other 2015 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Brake linings and pads (33% better than other 2015 vans)
        • 1.8% fail on Brake pads (33% better than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.024% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.54% fail on Brake discs and drums (44% better than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.52% fail on Brake discs (46% better than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.024% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.024% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.024% fail on Linkage
    • 1.5% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (90% worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Electronic stability control (190% worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.52% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.071% fail on Electronic braking system (5 times worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.52% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.33% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.33% fail on Lever
    • 0.21% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.19% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.024% fail on Pedal
    • 0.071% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.071% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (3 times worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.047% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.047% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.047% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 1.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (68% worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.19% fail on Seat belts (71% better than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Condition (68% better than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.071% fail on Airbags
      • 0.071% fail on Drivers airbag (3 times worse than other 2015 vans)
  • 1.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (38% better than other 2015 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Exhaust emissions (37% better than other 2015 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Compression ignition (45% better than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.87% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.17% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (67% better than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.47% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.47% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.071% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.047% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.024% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 1.3% fail on Body, chassis, structure (58% better than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.45% fail on Transmission (73% better than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.40% fail on Drive shafts (74% better than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.38% fail on Joints (75% better than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.024% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.047% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.047% fail on Joints
    • 0.21% fail on Body
      • 0.17% fail on Other body component
      • 0.047% fail on Panel
    • 0.19% fail on Doors
      • 0.19% fail on Other passenger's door (2 times worse than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.17% fail on Door condition (2 times worse than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.024% fail on Catch
    • 0.17% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.094% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.071% fail on Carrier
      • 0.024% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.071% fail on Exhaust system (83% better than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.047% fail on Seats
      • 0.047% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.024% fail on Chassis
      • 0.024% fail on Chassis condition
      • 0.024% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 0.024% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.024% fail on Tank
    • 0.024% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.024% fail on Bracket
    • 0.024% fail on Load security
      • 0.024% fail on Loading door
    • 0.024% fail on Undertray
  • 0.31% fail on Steering (84% better than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.26% fail on Steering linkage components (83% better than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.094% fail on Track rod end (94% better than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.024% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.024% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.024% fail on Steering play
      • 0.024% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.17% fail on Identification of the vehicle (59% better than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.17% fail on Registration plates (59% better than other 2015 vans)
  • 0.14% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.071% fail on Condition
    • 0.071% fail on Attachment