Nissan NV200 MOT Results

Registered in 2016
69.2% pass rate
from 3,427 tests in 2021
(16% worse than other 2016 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 vans and highlighted areas where the Nissan NV200 is unusually good or bad.

  • 14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (54% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Stop lamp (79% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Headlamps (92% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 3.6% fail on Headlamp (100% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.029% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 3.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (98% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim (37% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.58% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (190% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Direction indicators (82% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Flashing type (82% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 2.3% fail on Individual direction indicators (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.38% fail on All direction indicators (9 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.55% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.55% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.53% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.029% fail on Switch
    • 0.55% fail on Electrical equipment (100% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Horn (150% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Battery(ies) (7 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.058% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.029% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.38% fail on Reversing lamps (110% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Reversing lamps (120% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.29% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.26% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.029% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.12% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 6.6% fail on Suspension (46% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 3.5% fail on Suspension arms (180% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 3.1% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.18% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.029% fail on Suspension arm
    • 2.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (100% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Linkage ball joints (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.12% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.029% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.029% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.67% fail on Springs (56% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.55% fail on Coil springs (59% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.55% fail on Coil spring (59% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.058% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
        • 0.029% fail on Leaf spring
        • 0.029% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
    • 0.61% fail on Wheel bearings (140% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.18% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.18% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.088% fail on Suspension rods (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.088% fail on Ball joint (13 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.029% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 6.3% fail on Visibility
    • 4.6% fail on Wipers (82% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Washers (39% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.41% fail on View to rear
      • 0.35% fail on Mirrors
      • 0.058% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.18% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.18% fail on Windscreen
  • 6.1% fail on Tyres (30% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 3.6% fail on Tread depth (48% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Condition
    • 0.058% fail on Size/type
  • 5.0% fail on Brakes (23% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance (49% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt (52% worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.96% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.41% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.53% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (98% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.53% fail on Rbt (sp) (100% worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.38% fail on Service brake imbalance (200% worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.15% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.35% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (79% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.35% fail on Rbt (sp) (78% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.26% fail on Rbt
          • 0.26% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.029% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.029% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 1.4% fail on Mechanical brake components (54% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Brake linings and pads (57% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.99% fail on Brake pads (61% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on Brake linings (5 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.41% fail on Brake discs and drums (51% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.41% fail on Brake discs (50% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (120% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.93% fail on Electronic stability control (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.55% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.029% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.15% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.15% fail on Lever
    • 0.12% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.058% fail on Pedal (80% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.058% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.12% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.088% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.029% fail on Master cylinder
      • 0.029% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.029% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.088% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.088% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (7 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.058% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 1.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 1.7% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.1% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.99% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.058% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (81% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.029% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.029% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.55% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.55% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.029% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.029% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 1.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.58% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (87% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.44% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.38% fail on Condition
      • 0.029% fail on Attachment
      • 0.029% fail on Requirements
    • 0.029% fail on Airbags
      • 0.029% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.67% fail on Body, chassis, structure (68% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.15% fail on Spare wheel (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.088% fail on Spare wheel condition (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.088% fail on Carrier
    • 0.15% fail on Body
      • 0.12% fail on Other body component
      • 0.029% fail on Body condition
    • 0.12% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.12% fail on Transmission (88% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Drive shafts (87% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on Joints (87% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.088% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.058% fail on Doors
      • 0.029% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.029% fail on Door condition
      • 0.029% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.029% fail on Catch
  • 0.29% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.29% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.29% fail on Steering (72% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.20% fail on Steering linkage components (73% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.058% fail on Track rod end (92% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.029% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.029% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.029% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.029% fail on Steering play
      • 0.029% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.058% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.029% fail on Condition
    • 0.029% fail on Attachment