Peugeot Bipper MOT Results

Registered in 2009
54.8% pass rate
from 1,838 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 vans and highlighted areas where the Peugeot Bipper is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Suspension
    • 6.8% fail on Springs (39% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 6.8% fail on Coil springs (140% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 6.7% fail on Coil spring (140% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.054% fail on Mounting
    • 5.2% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.5% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.8% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.60% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.38% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.054% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.054% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 3.9% fail on Suspension arms (37% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.4% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.16% fail on Ball joint dust cover (87% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Suspension arm
    • 2.4% fail on Shock absorbers (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Macpherson strut (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.87% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (5 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.44% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Macpherson strut (4 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.22% fail on Wheel bearings (87% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.22% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.11% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.054% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.054% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.16% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.11% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.054% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.054% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.054% fail on Ball joint
  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (20% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 4.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 4.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.0% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.054% fail on Dipswitch
      • 0.054% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 4.0% fail on Stop lamp (36% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.1% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.22% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.16% fail on Side repeaters (81% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim (41% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim (38% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.054% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (51% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (51% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (51% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.60% fail on Battery(ies) (190% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Horn
      • 0.11% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.11% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.60% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.54% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.054% fail on Switch
    • 0.054% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.054% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.054% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 11% fail on Visibility (28% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 7.3% fail on Washers (68% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 4.3% fail on Wipers
    • 0.65% fail on View to rear
      • 0.60% fail on Mirrors
      • 0.054% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.49% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.49% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.11% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.054% fail on Driver's view
  • 10% fail on Tyres (60% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 6.3% fail on Tread depth (64% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Condition (47% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.33% fail on Size/type
  • 7.4% fail on Brakes (51% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Mechanical brake components (47% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Brake linings and pads (41% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Brake pads (42% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.054% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.82% fail on Brake discs and drums (49% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.82% fail on Brake discs (48% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.054% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.054% fail on Cable
    • 1.9% fail on Brake performance (78% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance (53% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt (52% better than other 2009 vans)
          • 0.76% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.65% fail on Service brake performance (69% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.054% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.054% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.44% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (92% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.44% fail on Rbt (sp) (92% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (81% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.22% fail on Rbt (sp) (81% better than other 2009 vans)
          • 0.16% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.11% fail on Service brake performance (84% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.11% fail on Parking brake performance (95% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.11% fail on Rbt (95% better than other 2009 vans)
          • 0.11% fail on Parking brake performance (94% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (170% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Pedal (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Hand lever
    • 1.5% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.4% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.054% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.65% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.65% fail on Lever
    • 0.22% fail on Rigid brake pipes (94% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.054% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.054% fail on Brake fluid
  • 7.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 6.9% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.8% fail on Compression ignition
        • 3.6% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.92% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (57% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.33% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 2.1% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.9% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (61% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.16% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.11% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.44% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.33% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.054% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.054% fail on Other leaks
  • 6.3% fail on Body, chassis, structure (32% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.3% fail on Transmission
      • 3.2% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.1% fail on Joints
        • 0.054% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.11% fail on Prop shafts (82% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.11% fail on Joints
    • 1.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.76% fail on Doors
      • 0.38% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.38% fail on Door condition (190% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.33% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.33% fail on Door condition
      • 0.054% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.054% fail on Door condition
    • 0.49% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.33% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.16% fail on Tank
    • 0.38% fail on Integral vehicle structure (64% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.33% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (69% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.054% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.054% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 0.22% fail on Body
      • 0.16% fail on Other body component
      • 0.054% fail on Panel
    • 0.16% fail on Seats
      • 0.11% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.054% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.11% fail on Chassis (84% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Chassis condition (84% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.054% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.054% fail on Carrier
  • 3.2% fail on Steering (38% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Steering linkage components (45% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Track rod end (40% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.60% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.44% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.16% fail on Operation
    • 0.33% fail on Power steering
      • 0.22% fail on Other components
      • 0.054% fail on Operation
      • 0.054% fail on Pump
  • 1.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (61% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.87% fail on Seat belts (55% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.71% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.11% fail on Condition (87% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.054% fail on Attachment
    • 0.33% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (68% better than other 2009 vans)
  • 0.71% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.71% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.60% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.38% fail on Attachment
    • 0.22% fail on Condition