Peugeot Boxer MOT Results

Registered in 1999
57.2% pass rate
from 1,373 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 vans and highlighted areas where the Peugeot Boxer is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.9% fail on Electrical equipment (37% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 3.4% fail on Horn (59% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.58% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.15% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 4.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.8% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 1.9% fail on Side repeaters (81% worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 0.29% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.073% fail on Switch
    • 4.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp (45% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp levelling device (3 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.36% fail on Dipswitch (3 times worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim (42% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim (46% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.44% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.0% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (49% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (49% better than other 1999 vans)
        • 2.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (49% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (48% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.58% fail on Hazard warning (2 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.58% fail on Switch (2 times worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.29% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.29% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.073% fail on Outline marker lamps
      • 0.073% fail on Outline marker lamp
    • 0.073% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 14% fail on Suspension (18% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 8.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.5% fail on Sub-frames (130% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (160% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.073% fail on Sub-frame
    • 2.0% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.4% fail on Springs (43% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.15% fail on Leaf springs (79% better than other 1999 vans)
        • 0.073% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
        • 0.073% fail on Shackle bracket
    • 1.4% fail on Suspension arms (68% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.73% fail on Ball joint (70% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.58% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.073% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.073% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.66% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.29% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.22% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.073% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.29% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.22% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.073% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.22% fail on Anti-roll bars (90% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (83% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.073% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.073% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.073% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 13% fail on Brakes (20% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 7.0% fail on Brake performance (37% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 4.0% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.8% fail on Rbt
          • 3.0% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.15% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.073% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.073% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.073% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.073% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.9% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (43% better than other 1999 vans)
        • 2.9% fail on Rbt (sp) (43% better than other 1999 vans)
          • 1.7% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 1.5% fail on Service brake performance (48% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (61% better than other 1999 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt (sp) (63% better than other 1999 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.73% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.22% fail on Parking brake performance (86% better than other 1999 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Rbt (91% better than other 1999 vans)
          • 0.073% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.073% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.073% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.073% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 5.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.2% fail on Mechanical brake components (50% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.58% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.58% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.44% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.44% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.22% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.15% fail on Cable
        • 0.073% fail on Lever
        • 0.073% fail on Linkage
        • 0.073% fail on Pivot
    • 0.95% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 0.66% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.58% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.58% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.29% fail on Other braking system component
        • 0.15% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
        • 0.073% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
        • 0.073% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
    • 0.44% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.15% fail on Servos
      • 0.15% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.073% fail on Master cylinder
      • 0.073% fail on Valves
    • 0.36% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.22% fail on Pedal
      • 0.15% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.15% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.15% fail on Lever
    • 0.15% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.073% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.073% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 13% fail on Visibility (26% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 7.4% fail on Washers (45% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 6.0% fail on Wipers
    • 0.29% fail on View to rear
      • 0.29% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.073% fail on Bonnet
  • 12% fail on Body, chassis, structure (18% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.7% fail on Chassis
      • 3.6% fail on Chassis condition
      • 0.073% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 3.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 3.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.2% fail on Transmission (67% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Drive shafts (59% better than other 1999 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Joints (61% better than other 1999 vans)
        • 0.073% fail on Bearing housing
    • 0.44% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.22% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.073% fail on Tank
      • 0.073% fail on Pipe
      • 0.073% fail on System
    • 0.44% fail on Doors
      • 0.22% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.15% fail on Door condition
        • 0.073% fail on Catch
      • 0.15% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.073% fail on Door condition
        • 0.073% fail on Catch
      • 0.073% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.073% fail on Hinge
    • 0.29% fail on Cabs
      • 0.29% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.15% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.15% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.15% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.15% fail on Seats
      • 0.15% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.073% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.073% fail on Body
      • 0.073% fail on Panel
    • 0.073% fail on Undertray
  • 3.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.4% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.7% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.3% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.44% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.073% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.80% fail on Compression ignition (65% better than other 1999 vans)
        • 0.44% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (63% better than other 1999 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Pre 01/01/1980 visual
        • 0.15% fail on Emissions not tested (80% better than other 1999 vans)
        • 0.073% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
    • 0.73% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.29% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.22% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.15% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
      • 0.073% fail on Other leaks
  • 2.8% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.8% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.2% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.44% fail on Condition
      • 0.15% fail on Attachment
      • 0.073% fail on Requirements
  • 1.7% fail on Tyres (57% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Condition
    • 0.36% fail on Tread depth (82% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.073% fail on Size/type
  • 1.4% fail on Steering (77% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.58% fail on Power steering
      • 0.44% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.073% fail on Pump
      • 0.073% fail on Other components
    • 0.36% fail on Steering gear (84% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.36% fail on Steering rack (83% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.36% fail on Steering linkage components (89% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.36% fail on Track rod end (87% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.073% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 0.22% fail on Identification of the vehicle (77% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.22% fail on Registration plates (77% better than other 1999 vans)
  • 0.15% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.15% fail on Speedometer
  • 0.073% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.073% fail on Attachment