Peugeot Boxer MOT Results

Registered in 2000
58.4% pass rate
from 1,435 tests in 2021
(11% better than other 2000 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 vans and highlighted areas where the Peugeot Boxer is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (18% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 5.6% fail on Electrical equipment (80% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 4.2% fail on Horn (110% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.84% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.70% fail on Electrical wiring (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.070% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 5.1% fail on Direction indicators (38% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 5.1% fail on Flashing type (38% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 3.6% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 1.2% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.35% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.070% fail on Switch
    • 3.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp (50% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp levelling device (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Dipswitch
    • 2.8% fail on Stop lamp (39% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim (54% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim (58% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.1% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (74% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (74% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (74% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.91% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (66% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.42% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.42% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.42% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.42% fail on Switch
    • 0.21% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.21% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
    • 0.070% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 16% fail on Suspension (14% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 10.0% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.7% fail on Sub-frames (130% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (150% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Sub-frame
    • 2.2% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.8% fail on Suspension arms (63% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.77% fail on Ball joint (72% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.77% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.35% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.070% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.4% fail on Springs (48% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.070% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.070% fail on Leaf spring
    • 0.63% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.35% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.28% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.070% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.070% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.070% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.070% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.070% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
  • 13% fail on Brakes (27% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 8.2% fail on Brake performance (33% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 5.5% fail on Service brake performance
        • 5.4% fail on Rbt
          • 5.1% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.77% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.070% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.070% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 2.9% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (52% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 2.9% fail on Rbt (sp) (52% better than other 2000 vans)
          • 1.7% fail on Service brake imbalance (45% better than other 2000 vans)
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance (65% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (77% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 1.0% fail on Rbt (sp) (77% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.77% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.28% fail on Parking brake performance (83% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.28% fail on Rbt (82% better than other 2000 vans)
          • 0.28% fail on Parking brake performance (80% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 4.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.8% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.84% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.84% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.49% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.49% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.49% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.35% fail on Cable
        • 0.14% fail on Pivot (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.84% fail on Load sensing valves (62% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.63% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.35% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.21% fail on Pedal
      • 0.14% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.21% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.070% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.070% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.070% fail on Valves
    • 0.070% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.070% fail on Servos
    • 0.070% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.070% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.070% fail on Other braking system component
  • 10% fail on Body, chassis, structure (33% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 3.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 3.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 0.070% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.070% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 2.9% fail on Chassis
      • 2.8% fail on Chassis condition
      • 0.14% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 2.7% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.3% fail on Transmission (67% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Drive shafts (57% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Joints (56% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.35% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.21% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.070% fail on Hose
      • 0.070% fail on Pipe
    • 0.21% fail on Towbar
      • 0.14% fail on Other towbar components
      • 0.070% fail on Coupling
    • 0.21% fail on Body (79% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Other body component
      • 0.070% fail on Panel
    • 0.21% fail on Floor
    • 0.21% fail on Cabs
      • 0.21% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.14% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.14% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.14% fail on Seats
      • 0.14% fail on Passenger's seat
      • 0.070% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.070% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.070% fail on Engine mounting condition
  • 9.9% fail on Visibility
    • 6.0% fail on Wipers
    • 4.8% fail on Washers
    • 0.28% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.28% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.21% fail on View to rear
      • 0.21% fail on Mirrors
  • 2.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (35% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.7% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.98% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.56% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.14% fail on Non catalyst emissions (6 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.77% fail on Compression ignition (70% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.35% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (73% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.21% fail on Emissions not tested (75% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.14% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.070% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
    • 0.49% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.35% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.14% fail on Other leaks
  • 2.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.8% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.3% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.28% fail on Condition
      • 0.14% fail on Requirements
      • 0.070% fail on Attachment
    • 0.14% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 1.7% fail on Tyres (61% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Condition
    • 0.28% fail on Tread depth (88% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.070% fail on Size/type
  • 1.7% fail on Steering (75% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.63% fail on Power steering
      • 0.42% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.21% fail on Other components
      • 0.14% fail on Operation
    • 0.56% fail on Steering linkage components (85% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.49% fail on Track rod end (85% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.070% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.35% fail on Steering gear (85% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Steering rack (87% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.070% fail on Operation
    • 0.14% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 0.42% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.42% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.14% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.070% fail on Condition
    • 0.070% fail on Attachment