Peugeot Boxer MOT Results

Registered in 2015
70.8% pass rate
from 9,815 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2015 vans and highlighted areas where the Peugeot Boxer is unusually good or bad.

  • 12% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (10.0% worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Headlamps (70% worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 3.7% fail on Headlamp (71% worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.010% fail on Matched pair
    • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim (23% worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.58% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (140% worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Direction indicators (50% worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Flashing type (50% worse than other 2015 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Side repeaters (69% worse than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.86% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.031% fail on All direction indicators
    • 2.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.95% fail on Stop lamp (61% better than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.82% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.82% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.82% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.41% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.19% fail on Horn
      • 0.12% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.092% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.26% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.25% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.010% fail on Switch
    • 0.24% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.24% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.092% fail on Rear reflectors (64% better than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.031% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.031% fail on Switch
    • 0.010% fail on Outline marker lamps
      • 0.010% fail on Outline marker lamp
    • 0.010% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.010% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 11% fail on Brakes (40% worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 8.4% fail on Brake performance (150% worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 6.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 2015 vans)
        • 6.8% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.031% fail on Plate brake tester (sp) (4 times worse than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.020% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance (180% worse than other 2015 vans)
        • 1.9% fail on Rbt (180% worse than other 2015 vans)
          • 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance (180% worse than other 2015 vans)
          • 0.23% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (2 times worse than other 2015 vans)
          • 0.082% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (3 times worse than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.031% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.020% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.010% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.020% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.010% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.010% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.7% fail on Service brake performance (53% worse than other 2015 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt (51% worse than other 2015 vans)
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance (55% worse than other 2015 vans)
          • 0.48% fail on Service brake imbalance (64% worse than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.051% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.041% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
          • 0.010% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.47% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.46% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.37% fail on Service brake performance (88% worse than other 2015 vans)
          • 0.17% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.010% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.010% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.092% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.0% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.4% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.4% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.010% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.69% fail on Brake discs and drums (28% better than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.69% fail on Brake discs (27% better than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.33% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (110% worse than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.11% fail on Cable
        • 0.082% fail on Pivot (8 times worse than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.061% fail on Linkage (5 times worse than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.041% fail on Lever
        • 0.031% fail on Relay lever (6 times worse than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.010% fail on Brake slack adjuster
    • 0.66% fail on Parking brake control (84% worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.66% fail on Lever (85% worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.26% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (66% better than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Anti-lock braking system (65% better than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Electronic stability control (68% better than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.23% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (45% better than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Pedal
      • 0.031% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.16% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.071% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.071% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.041% fail on Rigid brake pipes (95% better than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.020% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.020% fail on Other components
    • 0.010% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.010% fail on Servos
  • 6.2% fail on Visibility
    • 3.3% fail on Wipers (32% worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Washers (32% better than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.96% fail on View to rear (110% worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.93% fail on Mirrors (110% worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.041% fail on Indirect vision devices (3 times worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.78% fail on Condition of glass (76% worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.78% fail on Windscreen (78% worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.010% fail on Window
    • 0.020% fail on Bonnet
  • 5.4% fail on Suspension (19% better than other 2015 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Suspension arms (44% worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Ball joint (74% worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.94% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.35% fail on Ball joint dust cover (79% worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.010% fail on Suspension arm
    • 1.2% fail on Shock absorbers (130% worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Springs (46% better than other 2015 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Coil springs (48% better than other 2015 vans)
        • 1.0% fail on Coil spring (48% better than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.071% fail on Leaf spring
        • 0.041% fail on Anchor pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.020% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
        • 0.010% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
      • 0.010% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.43% fail on Other suspension component (120% worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.37% fail on Ball joint (190% worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.061% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.21% fail on Wheel bearings (45% better than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.071% fail on Anti-roll bars (96% better than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.051% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (83% better than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.010% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.010% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 0.061% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.020% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.010% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.010% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.010% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.010% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.031% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.010% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.010% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.010% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.020% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 3.1% fail on Tyres (38% better than other 2015 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Condition (35% better than other 2015 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Tread depth (44% better than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.20% fail on Size/type
  • 2.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.5% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.0% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.99% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.87% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (72% worse than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.092% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.092% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.051% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.041% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.041% fail on Particulate filter (2 times worse than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.020% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
      • 0.45% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.41% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.031% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.010% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.24% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.21% fail on Engine oil leaks (100% worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.020% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.010% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 2.4% fail on Body, chassis, structure (21% better than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.71% fail on Body (93% worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.56% fail on Other body component (91% worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Panel (130% worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.010% fail on Body condition
      • 0.010% fail on Mounting fixings
    • 0.70% fail on Transmission (57% better than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.67% fail on Drive shafts (56% better than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.64% fail on Joints (57% better than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.041% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.031% fail on Prop shafts (75% better than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.031% fail on Joints
    • 0.28% fail on Doors
      • 0.11% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.11% fail on Door condition (130% worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.092% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.082% fail on Door condition
        • 0.010% fail on Catch
      • 0.071% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.031% fail on Catch (3 times worse than other 2015 vans)
        • 0.020% fail on Door condition
        • 0.020% fail on Hinge
    • 0.18% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.12% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.031% fail on Tank
      • 0.031% fail on Hose (5 times worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.010% fail on Pipe
    • 0.16% fail on Exhaust system (61% better than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.13% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.13% fail on Engine mounting condition (120% worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.12% fail on Seats
      • 0.092% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.031% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.041% fail on Load security
      • 0.031% fail on Loading door
      • 0.010% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.010% fail on Tailgate condition
    • 0.020% fail on Chassis
      • 0.020% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.020% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.020% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.010% fail on Towbar
      • 0.010% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.010% fail on Floor
    • 0.010% fail on Driving controls
    • 0.010% fail on Passenger compartment
  • 1.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (46% worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (120% worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.61% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.54% fail on Condition
      • 0.051% fail on Requirements
      • 0.020% fail on Attachment
      • 0.010% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 0.72% fail on Steering (62% better than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.43% fail on Steering linkage components (73% better than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.36% fail on Track rod end (76% better than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.051% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.010% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.010% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.24% fail on Power steering
      • 0.13% fail on Other components (160% worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.092% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.020% fail on Operation
      • 0.010% fail on Rams
    • 0.041% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.041% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.010% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.010% fail on Steering column
  • 0.28% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.28% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.14% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.13% fail on Attachment
    • 0.010% fail on Condition
  • 0.071% fail on Buses and coaches supplementary tests (3 times worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.051% fail on Doors (6 times worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.031% fail on Emergency exits (6 times worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.020% fail on Passenger entrance/exit doors (7 times worse than other 2015 vans)
    • 0.031% fail on Steps and stairs
      • 0.031% fail on Retractable steps
  • 0.031% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.031% fail on Speed limiter (5 times worse than other 2015 vans)
      • 0.031% fail on Speed limiter plate (5 times worse than other 2015 vans)