MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Peugeot » Expert » 2010

Peugeot Expert MOT Results

Registered in 2010
52.7% pass rate
from 2,617 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Peugeot Expert is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.34% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 4.1% fail on Direction indicators (42% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 4.1% fail on Flashing type (42% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 3.5% fail on Individual direction indicators (75% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.53% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.19% fail on All direction indicators
    • 3.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.6% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.15% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.038% fail on Dipswitch
    • 3.1% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (37% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (37% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 3.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (37% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.53% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.53% fail on Switch
    • 0.31% fail on Electrical equipment (67% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Horn (75% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.076% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.038% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.038% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.23% fail on Reversing lamps (67% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Reversing lamps (66% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.11% fail on Position lamps (73% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.038% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 17% fail on Body, chassis, structure (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 13% fail on Transmission (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 12% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 12% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.076% fail on Flexible couplings (7 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.53% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.53% fail on Joints (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.0% fail on Exhaust system (170% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.46% fail on Doors
      • 0.34% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.34% fail on Door condition
      • 0.11% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.11% fail on Door condition
    • 0.38% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.19% fail on Pipe
      • 0.076% fail on Tank
      • 0.076% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.038% fail on System
    • 0.34% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.31% fail on Engine mounting (190% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.31% fail on Engine mounting condition (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.15% fail on Body
      • 0.11% fail on Other body component
      • 0.038% fail on Panel
    • 0.11% fail on Integral vehicle structure (85% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.076% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (90% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.038% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.038% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 0.11% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.11% fail on Spare wheel condition (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.038% fail on Carrier
    • 0.11% fail on Seats
      • 0.076% fail on Passenger's seat
      • 0.038% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.076% fail on Undertray
    • 0.038% fail on Towbar
      • 0.038% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.038% fail on Load security
      • 0.038% fail on Tailgate
    • 0.038% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.038% fail on Boot lid condition
    • 0.038% fail on Cabs
      • 0.038% fail on Steps
  • 16% fail on Suspension
    • 8.7% fail on Suspension arms (50% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 7.4% fail on Ball joint (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.23% fail on Pins and bushes (89% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.038% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 6.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.9% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.6% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.92% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.76% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.53% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.15% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (73% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.076% fail on Linkage
      • 0.038% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.038% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.3% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.88% fail on Springs (82% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.88% fail on Coil springs (71% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.88% fail on Coil spring (70% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.76% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.65% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.15% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.34% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.31% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (74% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.23% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (10 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.076% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.038% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.19% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension (11 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.076% fail on Suspension unit (25 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.076% fail on Bellows (25 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.038% fail on Operation
    • 0.15% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.076% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.038% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.038% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.076% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.038% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.038% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 11% fail on Brakes (28% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 6.2% fail on Brake performance (20% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (38% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 3.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (37% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.6% fail on Rbt
          • 2.0% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.69% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.11% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.11% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.9% fail on Rbt
          • 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.11% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.076% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.038% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.038% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.73% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.73% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.57% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.15% fail on Service brake performance (76% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.5% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.4% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.076% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.4% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.4% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.31% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.19% fail on Cable
        • 0.038% fail on Lever
        • 0.038% fail on Linkage
        • 0.038% fail on Pivot
    • 1.6% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Pedal (190% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.46% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (67% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.46% fail on Anti-lock braking system (62% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.038% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.27% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.27% fail on Lever
    • 0.15% fail on Rigid brake pipes (96% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.15% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.15% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.076% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.038% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
      • 0.038% fail on Air brake cylinder/actuator
    • 0.076% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.076% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.038% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.038% fail on Servos
  • 10% fail on Visibility (17% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.4% fail on Wipers (38% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.2% fail on Washers
    • 0.34% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.34% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.31% fail on View to rear (58% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.31% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.038% fail on Driver's view
  • 6.6% fail on Tyres
    • 4.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.4% fail on Condition
    • 0.19% fail on Size/type
  • 4.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (22% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.0% fail on Exhaust emissions (28% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.5% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.9% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 1.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (37% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.38% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.076% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.038% fail on Exhaust gas recirculation valve
          • 0.038% fail on Other emission control equipment
        • 0.038% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
      • 0.57% fail on Spark ignition (48% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.53% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.038% fail on Non catalyst emissions
    • 0.76% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.69% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.11% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.038% fail on Other leaks
  • 2.8% fail on Steering (48% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Steering linkage components (62% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Track rod end (63% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.50% fail on Power steering
      • 0.19% fail on Operation
      • 0.15% fail on Other components
      • 0.11% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.076% fail on Pump
      • 0.038% fail on Rams
    • 0.42% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.42% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.15% fail on Steering wheel (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.038% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.038% fail on Steering shaft
    • 0.038% fail on Steering play
      • 0.038% fail on Steering rack
  • 1.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (40% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.80% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.69% fail on Seat belts (56% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.53% fail on Condition
      • 0.076% fail on Prescribed areas (90% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.076% fail on Attachment
  • 0.50% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.50% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.15% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.15% fail on Attachment