MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Peugeot » Partner » 2000

Peugeot Partner MOT Results

Registered in 2000
46.7% pass rate
from 259 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 vans and highlighted areas where the Peugeot Partner is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Suspension (33% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 12% fail on Suspension arms (140% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 6.9% fail on Ball joint (150% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 5.0% fail on Pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 5.4% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.3% fail on Linkage ball joints (7 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover (13 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (7 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.77% fail on Ball joint (8 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 4.6% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 4.2% fail on Springs
      • 3.5% fail on Coil springs (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 3.5% fail on Coil spring (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.39% fail on Torsion bars
        • 0.39% fail on Torsion bar
      • 0.39% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.7% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.2% fail on Axles (8 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.77% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (14 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.39% fail on Axle
    • 1.2% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.2% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.77% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.39% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.77% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.77% fail on Macpherson strut (27 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.77% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.39% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.39% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.39% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.39% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 24% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 10% fail on Stop lamp (130% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 6.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 6.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 4.2% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 2.3% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.39% fail on All direction indicators
    • 5.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 5.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.39% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.9% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.77% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (82% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.77% fail on Rear fog lamp (82% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.77% fail on Rear fog lamp (82% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.77% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.77% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.39% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.39% fail on Switch
  • 22% fail on Brakes
    • 12% fail on Brake performance
      • 9.3% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 9.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 5.0% fail on Service brake performance
          • 5.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 4.6% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.2% fail on Rbt
          • 3.9% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.39% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.39% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.77% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.77% fail on Rbt
          • 0.77% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.39% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 6.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 6.6% fail on Load sensing valves (200% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 1.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.2% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.2% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.39% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.39% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.77% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.39% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.39% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.39% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.39% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.39% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.39% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
    • 0.39% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.39% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.39% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.39% fail on Additional braking device
  • 15% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 7.7% fail on Transmission (90% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 7.7% fail on Drive shafts (150% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 7.7% fail on Joints (160% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 5.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.77% fail on Chassis
      • 0.77% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.77% fail on Body
      • 0.39% fail on Panel
      • 0.39% fail on Other body component
    • 0.77% fail on Seats
      • 0.39% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.39% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.39% fail on Doors
      • 0.39% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.39% fail on Door condition
  • 10% fail on Steering
    • 6.9% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 6.9% fail on Track rod end (110% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Steering gear
      • 2.3% fail on Steering rack
    • 1.2% fail on Power steering
      • 0.39% fail on Operation
      • 0.39% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.39% fail on Other components
    • 0.39% fail on Steering play
      • 0.39% fail on Steering rack
  • 9.3% fail on Visibility
    • 5.4% fail on Wipers
    • 3.5% fail on Washers
    • 0.77% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.77% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.39% fail on Bonnet
  • 6.2% fail on Tyres
    • 5.0% fail on Tread depth (120% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Condition
  • 4.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.5% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.7% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.5% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.77% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (17 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.39% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.77% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.39% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.39% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.2% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.2% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 2.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.9% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.2% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.39% fail on Condition
  • 0.39% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.39% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.39% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.39% fail on Anchorages