MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Peugeot » Partner » 2002

Peugeot Partner MOT Results

Registered in 2002
47.9% pass rate
from 1,266 tests in 2021
(8.8% worse than other 2002 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 vans and highlighted areas where the Peugeot Partner is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 9.8% fail on Stop lamp (84% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 7.9% fail on Direction indicators (100% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 7.9% fail on Flashing type (100% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 4.6% fail on Individual direction indicators (73% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 3.6% fail on Side repeaters (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.55% fail on All direction indicators
    • 3.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.32% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamps (38% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.16% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.0% fail on Electrical equipment (57% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.55% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.39% fail on Horn (75% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.95% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (74% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.95% fail on Rear fog lamp (74% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.95% fail on Rear fog lamp (74% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.39% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.39% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.16% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.16% fail on Switch
  • 20% fail on Suspension
    • 7.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.3% fail on Ball joint
      • 3.1% fail on Pins and bushes (90% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.16% fail on Ball joint dust cover (89% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.079% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 5.2% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.1% fail on Linkage ball joints (140% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.95% fail on Ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.71% fail on Ball joint (180% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.079% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.079% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.079% fail on Linkage
      • 0.079% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 4.1% fail on Springs
      • 4.0% fail on Coil springs (120% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 4.0% fail on Coil spring (130% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.079% fail on Torsion bars
        • 0.079% fail on Torsion bar
    • 3.1% fail on Wheel bearings (54% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (61% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.79% fail on Macpherson strut (180% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.39% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.24% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.16% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.55% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.32% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.16% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.079% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.47% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.32% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.16% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (14 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.39% fail on Axles
      • 0.24% fail on Axle
      • 0.16% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.16% fail on Shock absorbers (82% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.079% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.079% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 18% fail on Brakes
    • 8.5% fail on Brake performance (32% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 5.4% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 5.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 2.9% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 2.8% fail on Service brake performance
      • 3.9% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.8% fail on Rbt
          • 2.9% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.079% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.079% fail on Service brake performance (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.079% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.079% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (75% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (75% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.47% fail on Parking brake performance (75% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.47% fail on Rbt (73% better than other 2002 vans)
          • 0.47% fail on Parking brake performance (69% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.32% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.8% fail on Load sensing valves (160% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 4.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.7% fail on Mechanical brake components (42% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.7% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.32% fail on Brake linings and pads (76% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.32% fail on Brake pads (75% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.55% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.55% fail on Pedal
    • 0.55% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.24% fail on Valves
      • 0.16% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.16% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.32% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.24% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.24% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.16% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.16% fail on Lever
    • 0.079% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.079% fail on Additional braking device
  • 15% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 8.0% fail on Transmission (63% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 7.7% fail on Drive shafts (100% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 7.7% fail on Joints (110% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.39% fail on Prop shafts (66% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.39% fail on Joints
    • 5.7% fail on Exhaust system (70% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure (46% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (46% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.95% fail on Doors
      • 0.71% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.71% fail on Door condition
      • 0.24% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.24% fail on Door condition
      • 0.079% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.079% fail on Door condition
    • 0.47% fail on Seats
      • 0.32% fail on Passenger's seat
      • 0.24% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.39% fail on Body
      • 0.24% fail on Panel
      • 0.16% fail on Other body component
    • 0.24% fail on Chassis (92% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Chassis condition (92% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.24% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.16% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.079% fail on System
    • 0.16% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.16% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.079% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.079% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.079% fail on Carrier
    • 0.079% fail on Load security
      • 0.079% fail on Loading door
    • 0.079% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.079% fail on Boot lid condition
    • 0.079% fail on Cabs
      • 0.079% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 10.0% fail on Visibility
    • 5.5% fail on Wipers
    • 4.7% fail on Washers
    • 0.55% fail on View to rear
      • 0.55% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.16% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.16% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.079% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.079% fail on Bonnet
  • 8.0% fail on Tyres (51% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 4.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.79% fail on Size/type (160% worse than other 2002 vans)
  • 7.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (77% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 5.0% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.2% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.47% fail on Condition
    • 0.32% fail on Airbags (6 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Drivers airbag (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.079% fail on Passengers airbag
  • 6.4% fail on Steering
    • 4.2% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 4.0% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.16% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.2% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.0% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.24% fail on Operation (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Power steering
      • 0.39% fail on Operation
      • 0.39% fail on Other components
      • 0.24% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.16% fail on Pump
      • 0.079% fail on Rams
    • 0.32% fail on Steering play
      • 0.32% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.079% fail on Steering column
  • 3.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.4% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.8% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.39% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.16% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.079% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.079% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.079% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 1.7% fail on Spark ignition (110% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.79% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.71% fail on Emissions not tested (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.24% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.55% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.47% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.079% fail on Other leaks
  • 1.3% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.16% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.16% fail on Attachment