MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Piaggio » Porter » 2008

Piaggio Porter MOT Results

Registered in 2008
45.5% pass rate
from 132 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 vans and highlighted areas where the Piaggio Porter is unusually good or bad.

  • 27% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 9.8% fail on Headlamp aim (160% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 9.8% fail on Headlamp aim (180% worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 7.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 6.8% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (150% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 6.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (150% worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 6.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (150% worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 5.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.3% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.8% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 3.0% fail on Horn (2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.76% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 3.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.0% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.0% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.0% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.76% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.76% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 26% fail on Brakes (50% worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 20% fail on Brake performance (100% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 16% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (9 times worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 16% fail on Rbt (sp) (9 times worse than other 2008 vans)
          • 11% fail on Service brake performance (11 times worse than other 2008 vans)
          • 6.1% fail on Service brake imbalance (6 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 11% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 11% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
          • 8.3% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
          • 2.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.76% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 2.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.76% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.76% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.76% fail on Rbt
          • 0.76% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 5.3% fail on Load sensing valves (22 times worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 4.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.5% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 1.5% fail on Pedal
    • 1.5% fail on Hydraulic systems (8 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.76% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.76% fail on Valves
    • 0.76% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.76% fail on Lever
    • 0.76% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.76% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.76% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.76% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.76% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.76% fail on Brake pads
  • 13% fail on Visibility
    • 7.6% fail on Wipers
    • 6.1% fail on Washers
  • 12% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 5.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.0% fail on Doors (3 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.76% fail on Door condition
        • 0.76% fail on Hinge
      • 1.5% fail on Other passenger's door (5 times worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Door condition (5 times worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Seats (7 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Driver's seat (11 times worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Chassis
      • 1.5% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.76% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.76% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.76% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.76% fail on Tank
    • 0.76% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.76% fail on Transmission
      • 0.76% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.76% fail on Joints
  • 12% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 11% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 9.8% fail on Spark ignition (5 times worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 4.5% fail on Catalyst emissions (31 times worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 3.0% fail on Emissions not tested (38 times worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 2.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 1.5% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.76% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.76% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.5% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.76% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.76% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 11% fail on Suspension
    • 6.8% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (140% worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.3% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.76% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.76% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 2.3% fail on Springs
      • 2.3% fail on Coil springs
        • 2.3% fail on Coil spring
    • 1.5% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.76% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.76% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.76% fail on Macpherson strut
  • 6.8% fail on Tyres
    • 4.5% fail on Condition
    • 3.0% fail on Tread depth
  • 3.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.0% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.5% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.5% fail on Condition
  • 2.3% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 2.3% fail on Registration plates
  • 1.5% fail on Steering
    • 1.5% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.76% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.76% fail on Other components
        • 0.76% fail on Steering linkage