MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Renault » Kangoo » 2002

Renault Kangoo MOT Results

Registered in 2002
48.9% pass rate
from 1,661 tests in 2021
(8.7% worse than other 2002 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 vans and highlighted areas where the Renault Kangoo is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Brakes
    • 13% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.7% fail on Service brake performance
        • 5.6% fail on Rbt
          • 4.9% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.060% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.060% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 5.0% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 4.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 4.1% fail on Service brake imbalance (47% worse than other 2002 vans)
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance (56% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.060% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 3.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (33% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 3.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (46% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.72% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (6 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.060% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
      • 2.3% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 2.0% fail on Rbt
          • 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.12% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.30% fail on Plate brake tester (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
          • 0.18% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
          • 0.060% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.060% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.36% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 3.8% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.5% fail on Brake discs and drums (92% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 2.5% fail on Brake discs (100% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.0% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.060% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.54% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.30% fail on Cable
        • 0.18% fail on Lever
        • 0.060% fail on Linkage
    • 2.8% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 1.3% fail on Parking brake control (95% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Lever (95% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.96% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.72% fail on Hand lever (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Pedal
    • 0.66% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.36% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.30% fail on Valves
    • 0.54% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.54% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.36% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.30% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.30% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.060% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.060% fail on Servos
    • 0.060% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.060% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.060% fail on Other braking system component
  • 18% fail on Suspension
    • 6.3% fail on Springs (80% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 6.3% fail on Coil springs (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 6.3% fail on Coil spring (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 6.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.8% fail on Ball joint (48% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.48% fail on Ball joint dust cover (66% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.060% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 5.2% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.6% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (150% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Linkage (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.42% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.30% fail on Linkage ball joints (65% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.12% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.060% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.060% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.060% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 2.6% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.3% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.96% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (87% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.60% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.48% fail on Pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.12% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.060% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.060% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.12% fail on Sub-frames (88% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.060% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.060% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.12% fail on Other suspension component (85% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.060% fail on Axles
      • 0.060% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
  • 17% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (19% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 5.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (50% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 3.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.3% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.48% fail on Dipswitch (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 3.6% fail on Stop lamp (32% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim (29% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim (30% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.2% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.4% fail on Horn
      • 0.78% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.12% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 1.6% fail on Hazard warning (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Switch (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.90% fail on Direction indicators (77% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.90% fail on Flashing type (77% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.36% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.36% fail on Individual direction indicators (86% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.18% fail on Side repeaters (85% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.54% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (85% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Rear fog lamp (85% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.54% fail on Rear fog lamp (85% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.48% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.30% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.18% fail on Switch (7 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.48% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.42% fail on Main beam tell-tale (7 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
    • 0.30% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 15% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 7.8% fail on Transmission (59% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 7.2% fail on Drive shafts (91% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 7.2% fail on Joints (93% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.30% fail on Joints
        • 0.12% fail on Prop shaft (83% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 0.060% fail on Belts
    • 6.0% fail on Exhaust system (80% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.90% fail on Doors
      • 0.36% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.36% fail on Door condition
      • 0.36% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.36% fail on Door condition
      • 0.18% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.18% fail on Door condition
    • 0.66% fail on Engine mounting (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.66% fail on Engine mounting condition (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.48% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.24% fail on Pipe
      • 0.18% fail on Hose
      • 0.060% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.42% fail on Integral vehicle structure (87% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.42% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (87% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.18% fail on Seats
      • 0.12% fail on Passenger's seat
      • 0.060% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.12% fail on Body (88% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Other body component
    • 0.12% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.060% fail on Boot lid condition
      • 0.060% fail on Other boot lid component
    • 0.060% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.060% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.060% fail on Carrier
    • 0.060% fail on Cabs
      • 0.060% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 14% fail on Visibility (35% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 7.5% fail on Washers (62% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 6.7% fail on Wipers
    • 0.72% fail on View to rear
      • 0.72% fail on Mirrors
      • 0.060% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.18% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.12% fail on Windscreen
      • 0.060% fail on Window
    • 0.12% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.060% fail on Driver's view
  • 12% fail on Steering (83% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 6.9% fail on Steering gear (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 6.9% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 5.6% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 5.4% fail on Track rod end (38% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.18% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.24% fail on Power steering
      • 0.12% fail on Operation
      • 0.060% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.060% fail on Other components
    • 0.12% fail on Steering play
      • 0.12% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.060% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.060% fail on Steering column
  • 9.0% fail on Tyres (70% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 4.6% fail on Tread depth (53% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 4.6% fail on Condition (100% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.84% fail on Size/type (170% worse than other 2002 vans)
  • 6.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (40% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 5.4% fail on Exhaust emissions (45% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.8% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.5% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.66% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (180% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.42% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.24% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.060% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.060% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.060% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 2.8% fail on Spark ignition (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Catalyst emissions (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.72% fail on Emissions not tested (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.54% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.18% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.060% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.060% fail on Catalytic converter
    • 0.90% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.72% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.12% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.060% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 6.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (45% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 5.1% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Seat belts (63% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.90% fail on Condition
      • 0.12% fail on Prescribed areas (94% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.060% fail on Attachment
      • 0.060% fail on Requirements
    • 0.060% fail on Airbags
      • 0.060% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.96% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.96% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.18% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.12% fail on Condition
    • 0.060% fail on Attachment
  • 0.12% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.12% fail on Speedometer
  • 0.12% fail on Seat belt installation check (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.12% fail on Anchorages (10 times worse than other 2002 vans)