MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Renault » Master » 1999

Renault Master MOT Results

Registered in 1999
45.0% pass rate
from 431 tests in 2021
(26% worse than other 1999 vans)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 vans and highlighted areas where the Renault Master is unusually good or bad.

  • 27% fail on Brakes (61% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 20% fail on Brake performance (83% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 9.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (120% worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 9.5% fail on Rbt (sp) (130% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 9.3% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (80% worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 9.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (83% worse than other 1999 vans)
          • 6.3% fail on Service brake performance (110% worse than other 1999 vans)
          • 5.3% fail on Service brake imbalance (93% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 7.2% fail on Service brake performance
        • 7.2% fail on Rbt
          • 5.3% fail on Service brake performance
          • 2.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.23% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.9% fail on Rbt
          • 1.4% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.23% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.23% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.2% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.1% fail on Load sensing valves (2 times worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.6% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 1.6% fail on Cable (180% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.70% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.70% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.23% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.23% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.70% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.46% fail on Pedal
      • 0.23% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.70% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.70% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.46% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.46% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
      • 0.23% fail on Additional braking device
    • 0.46% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.46% fail on Lever
    • 0.46% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.23% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.23% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.23% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.23% fail on Valves
    • 0.23% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.23% fail on Valves
    • 0.23% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.23% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  • 25% fail on Suspension (44% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 14% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (60% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 7.0% fail on Suspension arms (63% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 4.6% fail on Ball joint (92% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 2.6% fail on Springs
      • 1.4% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
      • 1.2% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.70% fail on Shackle bracket (9 times worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 0.23% fail on Leaf spring
        • 0.23% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
    • 2.3% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.9% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.70% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.70% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.46% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.9% fail on Sub-frames
      • 1.9% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.93% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.93% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.70% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.23% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.23% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 21% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 5.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.70% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 5.8% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 5.8% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 5.8% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 4.9% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 3.5% fail on Battery(ies) (190% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Electrical wiring (2 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.46% fail on Horn
    • 4.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.5% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.70% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.23% fail on All direction indicators
    • 3.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.23% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.93% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.23% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.23% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.23% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 20% fail on Body, chassis, structure (40% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 6.7% fail on Exhaust system (73% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 6.3% fail on Transmission (68% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 6.3% fail on Drive shafts (110% worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 6.3% fail on Joints (110% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 5.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 5.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 3.7% fail on Chassis
      • 3.7% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.4% fail on Body
      • 1.2% fail on Panel (2 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Other body component
    • 0.93% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.93% fail on Seats
      • 0.93% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.23% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.70% fail on Doors
      • 0.46% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.46% fail on Door condition
      • 0.46% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.46% fail on Door condition
    • 0.70% fail on Floor (5 times worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.46% fail on Cabs
      • 0.46% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.23% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.23% fail on Tank
    • 0.23% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.23% fail on Carrier
  • 18% fail on Visibility (75% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 14% fail on Washers (170% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 5.8% fail on Wipers
    • 0.23% fail on Bonnet
  • 8.8% fail on Steering
    • 5.1% fail on Steering gear (130% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 5.1% fail on Steering rack (140% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.9% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.46% fail on Locking devices (6 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.23% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.46% fail on Power steering
      • 0.23% fail on Operation
      • 0.23% fail on Other components
    • 0.46% fail on Steering coupling (14 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.46% fail on Universal joint (24 times worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.46% fail on Steering play
      • 0.46% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.23% fail on Steering wheel
  • 3.9% fail on Tyres
    • 2.8% fail on Condition
    • 1.4% fail on Tread depth
  • 3.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.5% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.3% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.4% fail on Condition
    • 0.23% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 3.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.1% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.9% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.93% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.93% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.23% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
      • 0.23% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.23% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.4% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.4% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 0.23% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.23% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.23% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.23% fail on Speedometer
  • 0.23% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.23% fail on Attachment