MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Renault » Master » 2016

Renault Master MOT Results

Registered in 2016
65.8% pass rate
from 6,637 tests in 2021
(26% worse than other 2016 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 vans and highlighted areas where the Renault Master is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (65% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Headlamps (110% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 3.8% fail on Headlamp (110% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Headlamp levelling device (170% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Direction indicators (160% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 3.7% fail on Flashing type (160% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 2.8% fail on Side repeaters (200% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.86% fail on Individual direction indicators (79% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.075% fail on All direction indicators
    • 3.6% fail on Headlamp aim (42% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim (35% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.45% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (130% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (86% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.9% fail on Stop lamp (40% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (130% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (130% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (130% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.51% fail on Position lamps (120% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.50% fail on Position lamp (120% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.015% fail on Switch
    • 0.42% fail on Reversing lamps (130% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.42% fail on Reversing lamps (140% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.33% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.15% fail on Electrical wiring (150% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Horn
      • 0.030% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.26% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.075% fail on Outline marker lamps (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.075% fail on Outline marker lamp (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.030% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.030% fail on Switch
  • 11% fail on Brakes (70% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 7.5% fail on Brake performance (190% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 5.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 5.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.015% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
        • 0.015% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 2.6% fail on Service brake performance (190% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 2.6% fail on Rbt (200% worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 2.1% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.65% fail on Service brake imbalance (190% worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.015% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.015% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.015% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance (120% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 1.0% fail on Rbt (120% worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.84% fail on Parking brake performance (110% worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.14% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (170% worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.045% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.075% fail on Plate brake tester (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.045% fail on Parking brake performance (5 times worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.030% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.74% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (180% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.72% fail on Rbt (sp) (180% worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.50% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.36% fail on Service brake imbalance (180% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.015% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.18% fail on Brake performance not tested (120% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 4.3% fail on Mechanical brake components (37% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 3.3% fail on Brake linings and pads (31% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 3.3% fail on Brake pads (32% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.1% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.48% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.33% fail on Cable (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.14% fail on Lever (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.030% fail on Linkage
        • 0.015% fail on Pivot
    • 0.42% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.42% fail on Pedal
    • 0.38% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.38% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.26% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.24% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.32% fail on Flexible brake hoses (140% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.21% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.21% fail on Lever
    • 0.12% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.12% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (170% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.045% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.030% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.015% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.015% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.015% fail on Servos
  • 6.7% fail on Visibility (26% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 3.5% fail on Washers (55% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Wipers
    • 0.83% fail on Condition of glass (100% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.83% fail on Windscreen (100% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.69% fail on View to rear (78% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.66% fail on Mirrors (75% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.030% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.24% fail on Bonnet (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.030% fail on Driver's view
  • 4.9% fail on Tyres
    • 2.7% fail on Condition
    • 2.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.20% fail on Size/type
  • 4.1% fail on Body, chassis, structure (94% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Transmission (98% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Drive shafts (96% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 1.8% fail on Joints (98% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.015% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.14% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.075% fail on Joints
        • 0.060% fail on Flexible couplings (14 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.015% fail on Belts
    • 0.95% fail on Body (200% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.77% fail on Other body component (190% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Panel (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.045% fail on Mounting fixings
      • 0.015% fail on Body condition
    • 0.42% fail on Doors (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Driver's door (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.20% fail on Door condition (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Other passenger's door (190% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Door condition (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Front passenger's door (190% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.090% fail on Door condition
        • 0.015% fail on Catch
    • 0.35% fail on Seats (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.32% fail on Driver's seat (5 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.030% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.23% fail on Fuel system (120% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Tank (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.090% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.015% fail on Pipe
    • 0.14% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.11% fail on Exhaust system (61% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.075% fail on Load security
      • 0.060% fail on Loading door
      • 0.015% fail on Dropside
        • 0.015% fail on Dropside condition
    • 0.075% fail on Undertray
    • 0.060% fail on Chassis (6 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.060% fail on Chassis condition (6 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.045% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.030% fail on Bracket
      • 0.015% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.030% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.015% fail on Spare wheel condition
      • 0.015% fail on Carrier
    • 0.015% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.015% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.015% fail on Towbar
      • 0.015% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.015% fail on Floor
    • 0.015% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.015% fail on Boot lid condition
    • 0.015% fail on Cabs
      • 0.015% fail on Cab condition
  • 3.6% fail on Suspension (19% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Suspension arms (56% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Ball joint (160% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.075% fail on Pins and bushes (85% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.63% fail on Anti-roll bars (45% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Linkage ball joints (47% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.075% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.045% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.045% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.030% fail on Linkage
      • 0.015% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.015% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.015% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 0.42% fail on Wheel bearings (68% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.38% fail on Other suspension component (150% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.33% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.045% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.015% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.32% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.090% fail on Springs (94% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.060% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.045% fail on Leaf spring
        • 0.015% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
      • 0.030% fail on Coil springs (98% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.030% fail on Coil spring (98% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.075% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.060% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.045% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.015% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.030% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.015% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.015% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 3.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (51% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 3.2% fail on Exhaust emissions (56% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Compression ignition (50% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 2.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (92% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.11% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (66% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.090% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.015% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.015% fail on Particulate filter
      • 0.81% fail on Spark ignition (70% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.78% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (74% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.030% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.090% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.045% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.030% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.015% fail on Transmission oil leaks
    • 0.015% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.015% fail on Undertray
  • 0.99% fail on Steering
    • 0.39% fail on Power steering (130% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Operation (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Other components (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.045% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.030% fail on Pump
      • 0.015% fail on Rams
    • 0.36% fail on Steering gear (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.36% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.23% fail on Steering linkage components (70% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Track rod end (81% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.060% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.030% fail on Locking devices (5 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.030% fail on Steering play
      • 0.030% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.015% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.015% fail on Steering shaft
    • 0.015% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.015% fail on Universal joint
  • 0.92% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.62% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.56% fail on Condition
      • 0.030% fail on Attachment
      • 0.015% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.015% fail on Requirements
    • 0.29% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.015% fail on Airbags
      • 0.015% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.33% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.30% fail on Registration plates
    • 0.030% fail on Vehicle Identification Number (19 times worse than other 2016 vans)
  • 0.045% fail on Buses and coaches supplementary tests
    • 0.030% fail on Steps and stairs
      • 0.015% fail on Steps
      • 0.015% fail on Retractable steps
    • 0.015% fail on Doors
      • 0.015% fail on Emergency exits
  • 0.045% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.030% fail on Attachment
    • 0.015% fail on Condition