MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Suzuki » Carry » 2003

Suzuki Carry MOT Results

Registered in 2003
53.4% pass rate
from 960 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 vans and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Carry is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Suspension
    • 12% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (67% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 8.6% fail on Suspension arms (35% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 8.1% fail on Ball joint (110% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.63% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.21% fail on Ball joint dust cover (86% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Suspension arm
    • 2.5% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.5% fail on Springs (61% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.94% fail on Coil springs (58% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.83% fail on Coil spring (62% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.10% fail on Mounting
      • 0.31% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.21% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.10% fail on Shackle bracket
        • 0.10% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
    • 0.31% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.31% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.10% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.10% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.10% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.10% fail on Sub-frame
  • 17% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (19% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 6.6% fail on Headlamps (45% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 6.6% fail on Headlamp (69% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 6.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.63% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.1% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 2.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 2.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 2.0% fail on Direction indicators (46% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Flashing type (46% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.73% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (68% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.83% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.83% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.42% fail on Electrical equipment (82% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Horn (85% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.10% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.10% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.10% fail on Switch
    • 0.10% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 11% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (150% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 11% fail on Exhaust emissions (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 11% fail on Spark ignition (14 times worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 5.3% fail on Catalyst emissions (18 times worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 4.7% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (13 times worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 2.3% fail on Emissions not tested (13 times worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.10% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.83% fail on Compression ignition (73% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.42% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.21% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.21% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 11% fail on Body, chassis, structure (27% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 4.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 3.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 2.9% fail on Chassis
      • 2.9% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.42% fail on Cabs
      • 0.42% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.31% fail on Body
      • 0.21% fail on Panel
      • 0.10% fail on Other body component
    • 0.10% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.10% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.10% fail on Towbar
      • 0.10% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.10% fail on Transmission
      • 0.10% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.10% fail on Prop shaft
      • 0.10% fail on Chains
    • 0.10% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.10% fail on Bracket
    • 0.10% fail on Load security
      • 0.10% fail on Loading door
    • 0.10% fail on Floor
    • 0.10% fail on Seats
      • 0.10% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 9.7% fail on Brakes (49% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 4.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 4.2% fail on Brake performance (67% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Service brake performance (55% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 2.1% fail on Rbt (54% better than other 2003 vans)
          • 2.0% fail on Service brake performance (47% better than other 2003 vans)
          • 0.21% fail on Service brake imbalance (81% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (78% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (81% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.21% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 1.3% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (76% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (76% better than other 2003 vans)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance (59% better than other 2003 vans)
          • 0.31% fail on Service brake performance (90% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Parking brake performance (90% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.21% fail on Rbt (90% better than other 2003 vans)
          • 0.21% fail on Parking brake performance (89% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.0% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.6% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.63% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.63% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.31% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.31% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.21% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.21% fail on Lever
    • 0.10% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.10% fail on Valves
    • 0.10% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.10% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.10% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.10% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.10% fail on Other braking system component
  • 8.8% fail on Visibility
    • 5.1% fail on Wipers
    • 2.6% fail on Washers (49% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Bonnet (5 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.31% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.31% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.10% fail on View to rear
      • 0.10% fail on Mirrors
  • 8.8% fail on Tyres (46% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 6.8% fail on Tread depth (94% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.31% fail on Size/type
  • 2.2% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (57% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.0% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.10% fail on Attachment
      • 0.10% fail on Condition
  • 0.94% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.94% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.31% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.31% fail on Attachment
  • 0.21% fail on Steering (97% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.10% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.10% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.10% fail on Steering play
      • 0.10% fail on Steering rack