MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Toyota » Dyna » 2009

Toyota Dyna MOT Results

Registered in 2009
59.3% pass rate
from 236 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Dyna is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Brakes
    • 16% fail on Brake performance (87% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 11% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (8 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 11% fail on Rbt (sp) (8 times worse than other 2009 vans)
          • 7.6% fail on Service brake imbalance (12 times worse than other 2009 vans)
          • 5.5% fail on Service brake performance (7 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 9.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (70% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 9.7% fail on Rbt (sp) (73% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 6.4% fail on Service brake performance (140% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 5.9% fail on Rbt (130% worse than other 2009 vans)
          • 5.1% fail on Service brake performance (140% worse than other 2009 vans)
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.42% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.42% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt
          • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 4.7% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 4.7% fail on Anti-lock braking system (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.1% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.7% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.42% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.85% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.42% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.42% fail on Brake drums
    • 1.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.85% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.85% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (25 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.42% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.42% fail on Lever
    • 0.42% fail on Load sensing valves
  • 17% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.1% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 5.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 5.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 4.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.85% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.42% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.3% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 1.3% fail on Reversing lamps (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Reversing lamps (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.42% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.42% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 13% fail on Suspension
    • 8.1% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 6.8% fail on Pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.42% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 4.7% fail on Springs
      • 4.7% fail on Leaf springs (140% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 4.2% fail on Leaf spring (180% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.42% fail on Spring saddle
        • 0.42% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
    • 1.3% fail on Suspension arms (79% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.42% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.85% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.42% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.42% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.42% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.42% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.42% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 8.9% fail on Visibility
    • 4.7% fail on Wipers
    • 4.7% fail on Washers
    • 1.7% fail on View to rear
      • 1.7% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.42% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.42% fail on Windscreen
  • 7.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 6.4% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 5.5% fail on Compression ignition
        • 5.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.85% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
      • 0.85% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.85% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.85% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.85% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 4.2% fail on Body, chassis, structure (54% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Body
      • 1.3% fail on Other body component
      • 0.42% fail on Body condition
    • 0.85% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.85% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.85% fail on Chassis
      • 0.85% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.42% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.42% fail on Tank
    • 0.42% fail on Transmission
      • 0.42% fail on Halfshafts
    • 0.42% fail on Load security
      • 0.42% fail on Dropside
        • 0.42% fail on Dropside condition
  • 3.4% fail on Tyres
    • 2.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.85% fail on Condition
  • 2.1% fail on Steering
    • 1.7% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.3% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.42% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.42% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.42% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.42% fail on Power steering
      • 0.42% fail on Pipes and hoses
  • 2.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.3% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.85% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.42% fail on Attachment
    • 0.85% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 1.3% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plates
  • 1.3% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.85% fail on Attachment
    • 0.42% fail on Condition