Toyota Hi-Ace MOT Results

Registered in 2004
61.1% pass rate
from 1,490 tests in 2021
(23% better than other 2004 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Hi-Ace is unusually good or bad.

  • 15% fail on Suspension (27% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 7.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 5.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.0% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Linkage (150% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.87% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.54% fail on Linkage ball joints (71% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.13% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.13% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 2.3% fail on Suspension arms (66% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint (69% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.47% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.27% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Ball joint dust cover (83% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Pins and bushes (92% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.67% fail on Springs (82% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.60% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.067% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.067% fail on Leaf spring
    • 0.60% fail on Wheel bearings (69% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.40% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.20% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.13% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.067% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.067% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.13% fail on Axles
      • 0.13% fail on Axle (5 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.13% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.067% fail on Suspension rod
      • 0.067% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.13% fail on Sub-frames (85% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (79% better than other 2004 vans)
  • 13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (37% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 6.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (40% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim (55% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim (51% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.067% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.5% fail on Headlamps (67% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp (67% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.067% fail on Dipswitch
      • 0.067% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.5% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (52% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (52% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (52% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.67% fail on Horn
      • 0.54% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.13% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.13% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.94% fail on Direction indicators (73% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.94% fail on Flashing type (73% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.81% fail on Individual direction indicators (66% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.13% fail on Side repeaters (88% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.20% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.20% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.13% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.13% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
    • 0.067% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.067% fail on Switch
  • 10% fail on Brakes (46% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 4.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 3.9% fail on Brake performance (66% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Service brake performance (52% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 2.1% fail on Rbt (51% better than other 2004 vans)
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance (54% better than other 2004 vans)
          • 0.60% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.3% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (62% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (61% better than other 2004 vans)
          • 1.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.60% fail on Service brake performance (68% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (83% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (83% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.20% fail on Parking brake performance (92% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.20% fail on Rbt (92% better than other 2004 vans)
          • 0.20% fail on Parking brake performance (90% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.3% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 1.3% fail on Mechanical brake components (58% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.20% fail on Brake discs and drums (83% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.13% fail on Brake discs (88% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.067% fail on Brake drums
    • 0.54% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.27% fail on Pedal
      • 0.27% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.54% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 0.20% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.13% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.13% fail on Lever
    • 0.067% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.067% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.067% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.067% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 8.3% fail on Body, chassis, structure (41% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 3.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 3.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.8% fail on Chassis
      • 1.8% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.94% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.74% fail on Tank (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.067% fail on System
    • 0.87% fail on Body
      • 0.47% fail on Panel
      • 0.34% fail on Other body component
      • 0.067% fail on Body condition
    • 0.67% fail on Exhaust system (79% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.47% fail on Doors
      • 0.27% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.27% fail on Door condition
      • 0.13% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.067% fail on Door condition
        • 0.067% fail on Hinge
      • 0.067% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.067% fail on Door condition
    • 0.34% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.27% fail on Transmission (94% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Drive shafts (97% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.13% fail on Joints (97% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Prop shafts (83% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.067% fail on Prop shaft
        • 0.067% fail on Joints
    • 0.20% fail on Seats
      • 0.13% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.067% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.13% fail on Floor
    • 0.067% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.067% fail on Carrier
    • 0.067% fail on Towbar
      • 0.067% fail on Towbar condition
    • 0.067% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.067% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.067% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.067% fail on Boot lid condition
    • 0.067% fail on Cabs
      • 0.067% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 7.6% fail on Visibility (26% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 5.0% fail on Wipers
    • 2.1% fail on Washers (56% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.74% fail on View to rear
      • 0.74% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.20% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.13% fail on Windscreen
      • 0.067% fail on Window
    • 0.13% fail on Bonnet
  • 4.3% fail on Tyres (27% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 3.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.3% fail on Condition (51% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.13% fail on Size/type
  • 3.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.6% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.5% fail on Compression ignition
        • 2.8% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (62% worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.60% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.13% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.067% fail on Pre 01/01/1980 visual
        • 0.067% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
      • 0.067% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.067% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.27% fail on Fluid leaks (71% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Engine oil leaks (73% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.067% fail on Other leaks
  • 2.2% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (52% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.3% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.74% fail on Condition
      • 0.13% fail on Requirements
      • 0.067% fail on Pre-tensioners
    • 0.067% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.94% fail on Steering (87% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.47% fail on Steering linkage components (91% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Track rod end (94% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.067% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.067% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.067% fail on Lock stop
    • 0.27% fail on Steering play
      • 0.27% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.20% fail on Steering gear (84% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Steering rack (83% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.067% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.067% fail on Power steering
      • 0.067% fail on Operation
  • 0.81% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.81% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.20% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.20% fail on Attachment
  • 0.13% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.13% fail on Speedometer