MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Toyota » Hi-Ace » 2010

Toyota Hi-Ace MOT Results

Registered in 2010
70.0% pass rate
from 977 tests in 2021
(35% better than other 2010 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Hi-Ace is unusually good or bad.

  • 12% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (40% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (54% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim (42% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.8% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.8% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.8% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.2% fail on Direction indicators (57% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Flashing type (57% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.82% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.41% fail on Individual direction indicators (79% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Headlamps (71% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Headlamp (70% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.0% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.61% fail on Battery(ies) (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.41% fail on Horn
      • 0.10% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.10% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.10% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.10% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.10% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 8.1% fail on Brakes (45% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.8% fail on Brake performance (76% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt
          • 0.82% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.31% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.10% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.10% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.61% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.61% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.31% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.31% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.20% fail on Parking brake performance (89% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.20% fail on Rbt (89% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.20% fail on Parking brake performance (88% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (96% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.20% fail on Rbt (sp) (96% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.4% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 1.3% fail on Mechanical brake components (70% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Brake linings and pads (63% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Brake pads (62% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.31% fail on Brake discs and drums (81% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.31% fail on Brake discs (81% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.51% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.51% fail on Pedal
    • 0.51% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.51% fail on Lever
    • 0.41% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.31% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 0.10% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.10% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.10% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.10% fail on Other components
  • 8.0% fail on Suspension (53% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.1% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.0% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.31% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Pins and bushes (80% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Linkage ball joints (91% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.10% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.10% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.2% fail on Suspension arms (79% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Ball joint (65% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.10% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.82% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.41% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.31% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.20% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.20% fail on Pins and bushes (13 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.20% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.20% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.10% fail on Springs
      • 0.10% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
  • 6.1% fail on Visibility (29% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.3% fail on Wipers
    • 2.0% fail on Washers (51% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.20% fail on View to rear
      • 0.20% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.10% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.10% fail on Windscreen
  • 4.4% fail on Tyres
    • 2.3% fail on Condition
    • 2.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.10% fail on Size/type
  • 3.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (37% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Exhaust emissions (39% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.1% fail on Compression ignition
        • 2.4% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.41% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (82% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.20% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.20% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.10% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
      • 0.31% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.20% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.10% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.41% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.31% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.10% fail on Other leaks
  • 2.1% fail on Body, chassis, structure (73% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.82% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.41% fail on Transmission (90% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Drive shafts (94% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.20% fail on Joints (94% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.20% fail on Prop shaft
    • 0.31% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.20% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.10% fail on Pipe
    • 0.20% fail on Chassis
      • 0.20% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.10% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.10% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.10% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.10% fail on Body
      • 0.10% fail on Panel
    • 0.10% fail on Floor
    • 0.10% fail on Seats
      • 0.10% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.10% fail on Cabs
      • 0.10% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 1.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (58% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.92% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.41% fail on Condition
      • 0.31% fail on Requirements
      • 0.20% fail on Attachment
      • 0.10% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.10% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.41% fail on Steering (92% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.31% fail on Steering linkage components (93% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.31% fail on Track rod end (93% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.10% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.10% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.20% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.20% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.20% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.20% fail on Attachment
  • 0.10% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.10% fail on Anchorages