MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Vauxhall » Astravan » 2010

Vauxhall Astravan MOT Results

Registered in 2010
58.7% pass rate
from 998 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Vauxhall Astravan is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Suspension (25% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 9.6% fail on Springs (99% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 9.6% fail on Coil springs (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 9.6% fail on Coil spring (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 7.6% fail on Suspension arms
      • 6.0% fail on Pins and bushes (180% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Ball joint (46% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 5.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.0% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.6% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 1.0% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.40% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.30% fail on Linkage
    • 1.9% fail on Axles (21 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (27 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.90% fail on Sub-frames (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.70% fail on Pins and bushes (10 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.10% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.50% fail on Wheel bearings (70% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.40% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.40% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.30% fail on Pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.20% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.10% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.10% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.10% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.10% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.10% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 15% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (23% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.20% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.3% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.10% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 3.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (38% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Stop lamp (59% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Electrical equipment (140% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Battery(ies) (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Horn
      • 0.10% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 1.8% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.8% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.8% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.10% fail on Switch
    • 0.50% fail on Direction indicators (83% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.50% fail on Flashing type (83% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.20% fail on Individual direction indicators (90% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.20% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.10% fail on Switch
    • 0.30% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.30% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.30% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.30% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 9.0% fail on Tyres (46% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 4.4% fail on Condition (67% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.30% fail on Size/type
  • 8.4% fail on Brakes (43% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.4% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.5% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.5% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.10% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.10% fail on Cable
    • 2.9% fail on Brake performance (63% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (60% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 2.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (59% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt
          • 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.70% fail on Service brake performance (70% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.70% fail on Rbt (69% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.50% fail on Service brake performance (73% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.20% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.10% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.6% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.1% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.70% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.60% fail on Rigid brake pipes (84% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.40% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.40% fail on Brake fluid (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.30% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.30% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.20% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.10% fail on Pedal
      • 0.10% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.10% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.10% fail on Lever
  • 7.8% fail on Visibility
    • 4.9% fail on Washers
    • 2.1% fail on Wipers (46% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.80% fail on View to rear
      • 0.80% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.40% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.40% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.10% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.10% fail on Bonnet
  • 4.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.9% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.0% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.9% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.90% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (60% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.10% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.10% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.90% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.80% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.10% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.10% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.10% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.10% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.40% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.30% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.10% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.10% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.10% fail on Undertray
  • 1.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure (77% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.70% fail on Transmission (82% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.70% fail on Drive shafts (80% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.70% fail on Joints (79% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.40% fail on Exhaust system (73% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.30% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.20% fail on Body
      • 0.20% fail on Other body component
    • 0.10% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.10% fail on Pipe
    • 0.10% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.10% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 1.0% fail on Steering (81% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.60% fail on Steering linkage components (86% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.60% fail on Track rod end (85% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.30% fail on Power steering
      • 0.30% fail on Operation
    • 0.10% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.10% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.80% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (67% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.60% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.10% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.10% fail on Condition
    • 0.10% fail on Airbags
      • 0.10% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.80% fail on Road Wheels (170% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.50% fail on Attachment
    • 0.30% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
  • 0.50% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.50% fail on Registration plates