MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Volkswagen » Caravelle » 2005

Volkswagen Caravelle MOT Results

Registered in 2005
56.6% pass rate
from 701 tests in 2021
(12% better than other 2005 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 vans and highlighted areas where the Volkswagen Caravelle is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Suspension
    • 7.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.7% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 2.6% fail on Ball joint
      • 2.6% fail on Ball joint dust cover (110% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 6.8% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.0% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.4% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 1.00% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.86% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.57% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.43% fail on Linkage
      • 0.14% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 4.4% fail on Springs
      • 4.4% fail on Coil springs (82% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 4.3% fail on Coil spring (78% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.14% fail on Mounting
    • 1.1% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.00% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.57% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.43% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.14% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.29% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (95% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.14% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.14% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.14% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.14% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.14% fail on Sub-frame
  • 17% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 3.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.43% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.43% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 3.1% fail on Stop lamp (46% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.1% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.43% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.14% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.3% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (57% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (57% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (57% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.57% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.57% fail on Electrical equipment (71% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.43% fail on Trailer electrical socket (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.14% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.14% fail on Main beam tell-tale
  • 13% fail on Brakes (26% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 5.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 4.4% fail on Brake performance (58% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (53% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 2.9% fail on Rbt (sp) (52% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Service brake performance (57% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt (56% better than other 2005 vans)
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance (55% better than other 2005 vans)
          • 0.57% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt
          • 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.14% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.43% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (84% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.43% fail on Rbt (sp) (83% better than other 2005 vans)
          • 0.29% fail on Service brake performance (80% better than other 2005 vans)
          • 0.29% fail on Service brake imbalance (81% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 2.1% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 1.6% fail on Electronic stability control (10 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.4% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.43% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.43% fail on Cable
      • 0.29% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.29% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.71% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.29% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.29% fail on Lever
    • 0.14% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.14% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 5.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 5.4% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 5.4% fail on Compression ignition (75% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 4.3% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (140% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.29% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.29% fail on Exhaust gas recirculation valve (10 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.29% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.29% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.29% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.14% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
    • 0.29% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.29% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 4.4% fail on Body, chassis, structure (67% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Transmission (65% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Drive shafts (58% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Joints (57% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.00% fail on Exhaust system (69% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.86% fail on Doors
      • 0.43% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.43% fail on Door condition
      • 0.29% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.29% fail on Door condition
      • 0.14% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.14% fail on Door condition
    • 0.29% fail on Integral vehicle structure (89% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (89% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.29% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.29% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.29% fail on Seats
      • 0.29% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.14% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.14% fail on Pipe
    • 0.14% fail on Undertray
  • 4.4% fail on Tyres
    • 2.4% fail on Condition
    • 2.0% fail on Tread depth
  • 3.1% fail on Visibility (69% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Wipers (76% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Washers (72% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.43% fail on View to rear
      • 0.43% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.14% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.14% fail on Windscreen
  • 2.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.6% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 1.00% fail on Seat belts (65% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.86% fail on Condition
      • 0.14% fail on Requirements
    • 0.14% fail on Airbags
      • 0.14% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 1.4% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plates
  • 1.3% fail on Steering (80% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.71% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.71% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.43% fail on Steering linkage components (91% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Track rod end (93% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.29% fail on Steering play
      • 0.29% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.14% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.14% fail on Attachment