LDV Cub MOT Results

Registered in 1999
35.2% pass rate
from 71 tests in 2017
(33% worse than other 1999 vans)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 vans and highlighted areas where the LDV Cub is unusually good or bad.

  • 41% fail on Suspension (80% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 31% fail on Prescribed areas (180% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 25% fail on Component mounting (2 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 11% fail on Spring mounting (180% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 2.8% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 9.9% fail on Leaf springs (8 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 9.9% fail on Pins and bushes (19 times worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 8.5% fail on Shackle (18 times worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 1.4% fail on Anchor
    • 8.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 8.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 2.8% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.8% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 2.8% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 2.8% fail on Condition
    • 1.4% fail on Front suspension joints
  • 31% fail on Brakes
    • 23% fail on Brake performance (83% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 15% fail on Front wheels (2 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 9.9% fail on Rear wheels
      • 4.2% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 4.2% fail on Service brake performance
      • 4.2% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.4% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 17% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 15% fail on Components
        • 14% fail on Pipes (200% worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 5.6% fail on Hoses
      • 2.8% fail on Leaks
      • 1.4% fail on Operation
    • 1.4% fail on Hub components
      • 1.4% fail on Brake pads
  • 25% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 11% fail on Headlamps (160% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 11% fail on Headlamp (170% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 1.4% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 5.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.2% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.4% fail on Rear lamps
    • 5.6% fail on Direction indicators
      • 5.6% fail on Flashing type
        • 5.6% fail on Individual lamps
    • 5.6% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.2% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 2.8% fail on Battery
    • 1.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 20% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 11% fail on Wipers
    • 11% fail on Washers
  • 15% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 8.5% fail on Body condition
    • 4.2% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 4.2% fail on Chassis
    • 2.8% fail on Seats
      • 2.8% fail on Drivers (5 times worse than other 1999 vans)
  • 15% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 14% fail on Exhaust system (140% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.4% fail on System
  • 7.0% fail on Tyres
    • 2.8% fail on Condition
    • 2.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.4% fail on Size/type
  • 1.4% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 1.4% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.4% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 1.4% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plate