LDV Cub MOT Results
Registered in 200038.9% pass rate
from 108 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 vans and highlighted areas where the LDV Cub is unusually good or bad.
-
41% fail on
Suspension
(73% worse than other 2000 vans)
-
39% fail on
Prescribed areas
(2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 27% fail on Component mounting (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 23% fail on Spring mounting (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 2.8% fail on Subframe mounting
-
8.3% fail on
Leaf springs
(5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
-
7.4% fail on
Pins and bushes
(13 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 7.4% fail on Shackle (16 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.93% fail on Condition
-
7.4% fail on
Pins and bushes
(13 times worse than other 2000 vans)
-
3.7% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 2.8% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.93% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 2.8% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.93% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.93% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.93% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 0.93% fail on Condition
-
39% fail on
Prescribed areas
(2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
-
32% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 13% fail on Headlamp aim (110% worse than other 2000 vans)
-
7.4% fail on
Position lamps
- 6.5% fail on Front lamps
- 0.93% fail on Rear lamps
-
6.5% fail on
Headlamps
- 6.5% fail on Headlamp
- 6.5% fail on Stop lamp
-
4.6% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 4.6% fail on Fog lamp
- 2.8% fail on Battery
- 2.8% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
0.93% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.93% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.93% fail on Individual lamps
-
0.93% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.93% fail on Horn
-
32% fail on
Brakes
(53% worse than other 2000 vans)
-
19% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(83% worse than other 2000 vans)
-
18% fail on
Components
(85% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 14% fail on Pipes (160% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 5.6% fail on Hoses
- 0.93% fail on Cylinders
- 2.8% fail on Leaks (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
-
18% fail on
Components
(85% worse than other 2000 vans)
-
19% fail on
Brake performance
- 13% fail on Front wheels (170% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 8.3% fail on Rear wheels
- 4.6% fail on Parking brake performance
- 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.93% fail on Brake imbalance
-
1.9% fail on
Hub components
- 0.93% fail on Brake back plates
- 0.93% fail on Wheel cylinder
- 1.9% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.93% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.93% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
-
19% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(83% worse than other 2000 vans)
-
18% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 9.3% fail on Wipers
- 4.6% fail on Washers
- 2.8% fail on Windscreen
- 0.93% fail on Mirrors
-
13% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 9.3% fail on Exhaust system
- 2.8% fail on Emissions not tested
- 1.9% fail on Emissions
-
1.9% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.93% fail on Cap
- 0.93% fail on System
-
9.3% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 7.4% fail on Body condition
-
3.7% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 3.7% fail on Chassis
-
6.5% fail on
Steering
-
5.6% fail on
Steering system
- 4.6% fail on Steering rack
- 0.93% fail on Track rod end
- 0.93% fail on Steering arm
-
0.93% fail on
Power steering
- 0.93% fail on Other components
-
5.6% fail on
Steering system
-
5.6% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
5.6% fail on
Seat belts
- 5.6% fail on Prescribed areas
-
5.6% fail on
Seat belts
-
2.8% fail on
Towbars
(5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 2.8% fail on Vehicle structure (7 times worse than other 2000 vans)
-
2.8% fail on
Tyres
- 1.9% fail on Condition
- 1.9% fail on Tread depth
-
0.93% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.93% fail on Condition
-
0.93% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.93% fail on Registration plate