Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

LDV Cub MOT Results

Registered in 2000
45.9% pass rate
from 61 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 vans and highlighted areas where the LDV Cub is unusually good or bad.

  • 34% fail on Suspension (74% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 33% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 8.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 6.6% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.6% fail on Suspension arm
      • 1.6% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 1.6% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 3.3% fail on Springs
      • 3.3% fail on Leaf springs
        • 3.3% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (10 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.6% fail on Linkage
  • 21% fail on Brakes
    • 11% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 11% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.6% fail on Service brake performance
        • 6.6% fail on Rbt
          • 6.6% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 4.9% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 4.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 3.3% fail on Service brake performance
          • 3.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 3.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 3.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 1.6% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt
          • 1.6% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 1.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.6% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.6% fail on Brake pads
  • 21% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 13% fail on Headlamp aim (160% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 11% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.9% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.3% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 3.3% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 3.3% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 1.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
  • 13% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 4.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 4.9% fail on Bumpers (12 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 3.3% fail on Chassis
      • 3.3% fail on Chassis condition
    • 3.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.6% fail on Transmission
      • 1.6% fail on Prop shafts
        • 1.6% fail on Prop shaft
    • 1.6% fail on Body
      • 1.6% fail on Panel
  • 11% fail on Visibility
    • 6.6% fail on Wipers
    • 6.6% fail on Washers
    • 1.6% fail on Bonnet
  • 6.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.3% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.6% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.6% fail on Catalyst emissions
      • 1.6% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.6% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 3.3% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.6% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 1.6% fail on Other leaks
  • 6.6% fail on Tyres
    • 3.3% fail on Size/type (10 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Condition
    • 1.6% fail on Tread depth
  • 4.9% fail on Steering
    • 3.3% fail on Steering gear
      • 3.3% fail on Steering rack
    • 1.6% fail on Power steering
      • 1.6% fail on Other components
    • 1.6% fail on Steering play
      • 1.6% fail on Steering rack
  • 3.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.3% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.6% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.6% fail on Condition
  • 1.6% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plates