MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Mazda » B2500 » 2003
Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Mazda B2500 MOT Results

Registered in 2003
52.4% pass rate
from 351 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 vans and highlighted areas where the Mazda B2500 is unusually good or bad.

  • 27% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 8.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (140% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 8.3% fail on Fog lamp (140% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Switch
    • 7.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.0% fail on Front lamps
      • 3.7% fail on Rear lamps
    • 5.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 4.3% fail on Individual lamps
    • 3.4% fail on Registration plate lamp (70% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.85% fail on Battery
    • 0.85% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.28% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.28% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 23% fail on Suspension
    • 11% fail on Drive shafts (120% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 11% fail on Front drive shafts (130% worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 11% fail on Constant velocity joints (130% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 4.6% fail on Shock absorbers (140% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 4.6% fail on Condition (140% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 4.3% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 2.6% fail on Component mounting
      • 2.0% fail on Spring mounting
    • 4.0% fail on Leaf springs (3 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 3.4% fail on Condition (7 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Shackle bracket
      • 0.28% fail on Securing bolts
    • 2.3% fail on Anti-roll bars (62% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.57% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (85% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.4% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.4% fail on Front
    • 1.1% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.85% fail on Suspension arms (82% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.85% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (81% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.28% fail on General condition
    • 0.28% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.28% fail on Attachment
  • 19% fail on Brakes
    • 11% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 11% fail on Components
        • 8.5% fail on Pipes
        • 3.1% fail on Valves
        • 0.57% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.28% fail on Hoses
      • 0.57% fail on Leaks
    • 6.6% fail on Brake performance (49% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 4.6% fail on Front wheels
      • 1.4% fail on Rear wheels (76% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.85% fail on Parking brake performance (87% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.57% fail on Service brake performance (80% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.0% fail on ABS (3 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Hub components
      • 0.85% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.57% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.28% fail on Brake back plates
    • 0.57% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.57% fail on Cable
    • 0.57% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.28% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.28% fail on Condition
    • 0.28% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.28% fail on Pedal
        • 0.28% fail on Condition
    • 0.28% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.28% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
  • 6.6% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 4.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.1% fail on Emissions
    • 1.1% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.57% fail on Pipe
      • 0.28% fail on Tank
      • 0.28% fail on Cap
    • 0.57% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 6.6% fail on Driver's view of the road (48% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Wipers (50% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Washers
    • 0.85% fail on Windscreen
  • 5.4% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 3.4% fail on Body condition
    • 2.3% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 2.3% fail on Chassis
    • 0.28% fail on Doors
      • 0.28% fail on Drivers
  • 2.8% fail on Steering (61% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Steering system (73% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.85% fail on Track rod end (80% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.57% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.57% fail on Other components
        • 0.57% fail on Steering pivot point
      • 0.28% fail on Free play
        • 0.28% fail on Steering box
      • 0.28% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.28% fail on Lock stop
    • 0.57% fail on Power steering
      • 0.57% fail on Operation
      • 0.28% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.28% fail on Steering control
      • 0.28% fail on Steering lock
    • 0.28% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 2.8% fail on Tyres (67% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Tread depth (68% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.85% fail on Valve stem (5 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.57% fail on Condition (84% better than other 2003 vans)
  • 1.7% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.7% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.57% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (90% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.57% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.57% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 0.28% fail on Towbars
    • 0.28% fail on Towbar
  • 0.28% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.28% fail on Attachment