Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Mazda B2500 MOT Results

Registered in 2004
50.3% pass rate
from 318 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 vans and highlighted areas where the Mazda B2500 is unusually good or bad.

  • 28% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 15% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 15% fail on Fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 7.5% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.3% fail on Front lamps
      • 2.5% fail on Rear lamps
    • 6.9% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 6.0% fail on Registration plate lamp (47% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 5.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 4.1% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.31% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.31% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.6% fail on Battery
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.3% fail on Horn
  • 24% fail on Brakes
    • 17% fail on Hydraulic systems (94% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 16% fail on Components (95% worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 11% fail on Pipes (80% worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 5.3% fail on Valves (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Hoses
        • 0.31% fail on Reservoirs
      • 2.2% fail on Leaks (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.31% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.31% fail on Operation
    • 8.5% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.4% fail on Front wheels
      • 2.2% fail on Rear wheels (60% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.94% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.94% fail on Parking brake performance (84% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.63% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.31% fail on Brake operation
    • 3.5% fail on ABS (180% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Hub components
      • 1.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.94% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.6% fail on Mechanical components (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Cable (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Restricted movement (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
  • 23% fail on Suspension
    • 10% fail on Drive shafts (130% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 10% fail on Front drive shafts (130% worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 10% fail on Constant velocity joints (130% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 5.0% fail on Leaf springs (4 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 3.5% fail on Condition (7 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Shackle (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.31% fail on Anchor
      • 0.31% fail on Shackle bracket
    • 4.7% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.5% fail on Linkage condition (5 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.94% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (78% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.63% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 4.1% fail on Shock absorbers (110% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 4.1% fail on Condition (110% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 4.1% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 2.8% fail on Component mounting
      • 1.9% fail on Spring mounting
    • 2.2% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 2.2% fail on Front
    • 1.6% fail on Suspension arms (66% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (72% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.31% fail on Attachment
    • 0.63% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.31% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.31% fail on Condition
  • 8.5% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 5.0% fail on Body condition
    • 3.8% fail on Vehicle structure (120% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 3.8% fail on Chassis (120% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.31% fail on Seats
      • 0.31% fail on Drivers
  • 6.6% fail on Driver's view of the road (44% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 3.1% fail on Wipers
    • 2.8% fail on Washers
    • 0.63% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.31% fail on Windscreen
  • 6.0% fail on Tyres
    • 4.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.6% fail on Condition
    • 0.31% fail on Valve stem
  • 5.7% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 4.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.6% fail on Emissions
  • 3.1% fail on Steering (55% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Steering system (63% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.94% fail on Track rod end (77% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.63% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.31% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.31% fail on Other components
        • 0.31% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 0.63% fail on Power steering
      • 0.31% fail on Operation
      • 0.31% fail on Other components
    • 0.31% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 2.2% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 2.2% fail on Registration plate
  • 1.9% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (65% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.63% fail on Condition
      • 0.31% fail on Requirements
      • 0.31% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.63% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.31% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.31% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.63% fail on Towbars
    • 0.63% fail on Towbar (7 times worse than other 2004 vans)
  • 0.31% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.31% fail on Attachment