Mazda B2500 MOT Results
Registered in 200552.2% pass rate
from 477 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 vans and highlighted areas where the Mazda B2500 is unusually good or bad.
-
29% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
-
13% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 13% fail on Fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.42% fail on Tell tale
- 8.2% fail on Headlamp aim
-
7.5% fail on
Position lamps
- 5.0% fail on Front lamps
- 3.1% fail on Rear lamps
- 5.9% fail on Registration plate lamp (45% better than other 2005 vans)
- 5.5% fail on Stop lamp
-
4.0% fail on
Direction indicators
-
4.0% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.9% fail on Side repeaters
- 1.7% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.42% fail on All direction indicators
-
4.0% fail on
Flashing type
-
3.4% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.4% fail on Headlamp
- 1.0% fail on Battery
- 0.84% fail on Trailer electrical socket (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.63% fail on Rear reflectors
- 0.63% fail on Horn
-
0.21% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.21% fail on Lamp
-
13% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
-
22% fail on
Suspension
-
9.6% fail on
Drive shafts
(150% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
9.2% fail on
Front drive shafts
(150% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 9.2% fail on Constant velocity joints (150% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
0.42% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.21% fail on Universal joint
- 0.21% fail on Drive shafts
-
9.2% fail on
Front drive shafts
(150% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
4.4% fail on
Shock absorbers
(130% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 4.4% fail on Condition (130% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
4.0% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.21% fail on Condition
- 0.21% fail on Attachment
-
4.0% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 2.3% fail on Spring mounting
- 1.9% fail on Component mounting
-
3.4% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(47% better than other 2005 vans)
- 1.7% fail on Linkage condition (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.84% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (80% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.42% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.21% fail on Condition
- 0.21% fail on Attachment
-
2.1% fail on
Leaf springs
- 1.9% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.21% fail on Shackle bracket
- 0.63% fail on Front suspension joints (74% better than other 2005 vans)
-
0.21% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.21% fail on Front
- 0.21% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
-
9.6% fail on
Drive shafts
(150% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
18% fail on
Brakes
-
10% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
9.9% fail on
Components
- 6.3% fail on Pipes
- 3.6% fail on Valves (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 1.3% fail on Hoses
- 0.84% fail on Leaks
- 0.42% fail on Operation
-
9.9% fail on
Components
-
6.5% fail on
Brake performance
(39% better than other 2005 vans)
- 4.4% fail on Front wheels
- 0.84% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.42% fail on Rear wheels (92% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.42% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.42% fail on Parking brake performance (93% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.42% fail on Brake operation (8 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.42% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
2.7% fail on
Hub components
- 1.9% fail on Brake pads
- 0.42% fail on Brake discs
- 0.21% fail on Brake back plates
- 0.21% fail on Brake calipers
- 1.5% fail on ABS
- 0.63% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.21% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.21% fail on Cable
-
0.21% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.21% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
-
10% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
8.4% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 5.2% fail on Wipers
- 2.7% fail on Washers
- 1.0% fail on Windscreen
- 0.42% fail on Mirrors
-
4.2% fail on
Tyres
(48% better than other 2005 vans)
- 2.9% fail on Tread depth
- 1.3% fail on Condition (63% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.21% fail on Valve stem
-
4.2% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 2.7% fail on Exhaust system
- 0.84% fail on Emissions
-
0.84% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.84% fail on Pipe (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.21% fail on Emissions not tested
-
3.8% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
-
1.9% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 1.9% fail on Chassis
- 1.9% fail on Body condition
-
0.21% fail on
Seats
- 0.21% fail on Passengers
-
1.9% fail on
Vehicle structure
-
3.1% fail on
Steering
(51% better than other 2005 vans)
-
3.1% fail on
Steering system
- 1.0% fail on Track rod end (73% better than other 2005 vans)
-
0.63% fail on
Other components
(6 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.63% fail on Steering pivot point (7 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.42% fail on Ball joint
- 0.42% fail on Drag link end
- 0.21% fail on Steering box
- 0.21% fail on Lock stop
- 0.21% fail on Steering arm
-
3.1% fail on
Steering system
-
2.9% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
(160% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 2.9% fail on Registration plate (170% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
1.3% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(74% better than other 2005 vans)
-
0.84% fail on
Seat belts
(73% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.42% fail on Condition
- 0.42% fail on Prescribed areas (81% better than other 2005 vans)
-
0.42% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.42% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
0.84% fail on
Seat belts
(73% better than other 2005 vans)
-
0.84% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.84% fail on Attachment