MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Nissan » Largo » 1997

Nissan Largo MOT Results

Registered in 1997
40.5% pass rate
from 79 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1997 vans and highlighted areas where the Nissan Largo is unusually good or bad.

  • 35% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 15% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 14% fail on Fog lamp (200% worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 3.8% fail on Tell tale (7 times worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 11% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 10% fail on Headlamps
      • 10% fail on Headlamp (150% worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 8.9% fail on Position lamps
      • 7.6% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.3% fail on Rear lamps
    • 6.3% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 3.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.5% fail on Rear reflectors (5 times worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Battery
    • 1.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.3% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.3% fail on Horn
  • 35% fail on Suspension (58% worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 16% fail on Anti-roll bars (3 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 13% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (5 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage condition
    • 13% fail on Suspension arms (3 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 13% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (3 times worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 6.3% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 5.1% fail on Component mounting
      • 3.8% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 5.1% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 5.1% fail on Condition
    • 2.5% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 2.5% fail on Drive shafts
      • 2.5% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 2.5% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 1.3% fail on Leaf springs
      • 1.3% fail on Condition
    • 1.3% fail on Sub-frames
      • 1.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 15% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 7.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 6.3% fail on Emissions (2 times worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 13% fail on Steering
    • 13% fail on Steering system (170% worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 7.6% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 6.3% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint
  • 11% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 8.9% fail on Wipers
    • 1.3% fail on Windscreen
    • 1.3% fail on Washers
  • 8.9% fail on Brakes (57% better than other 1997 vans)
    • 5.1% fail on Hub components
      • 5.1% fail on Brake pads
    • 3.8% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 3.8% fail on Components
        • 3.8% fail on Pipes
    • 1.3% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance
  • 8.9% fail on Tyres
    • 5.1% fail on Condition
    • 3.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.3% fail on Size/type
  • 5.1% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 2.5% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 2.5% fail on Chassis
    • 2.5% fail on Body condition
    • 1.3% fail on Seats
      • 1.3% fail on Passengers
  • 3.8% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 3.8% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.3% fail on Condition
      • 1.3% fail on Installation check
        • 1.3% fail on Anchorage's
      • 1.3% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 1.3% fail on Towbars
    • 1.3% fail on Vehicle structure
  • 1.3% fail on Road Wheels
    • 1.3% fail on Attachment
  • 1.3% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plate