Do you want the Road Tax system to change? Do you have thoughts on the potential changes to the Road Tax system? | No thanks
Nissan Largo MOT Results
Registered in 199740.5% pass rate
from 79 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1997 vans and highlighted areas where the Nissan Largo is unusually good or bad.
-
35% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
-
15% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(2 times worse than other 1997 vans)
- 14% fail on Fog lamp (200% worse than other 1997 vans)
- 3.8% fail on Tell tale (7 times worse than other 1997 vans)
- 11% fail on Headlamp aim
-
10% fail on
Headlamps
- 10% fail on Headlamp (150% worse than other 1997 vans)
-
8.9% fail on
Position lamps
- 7.6% fail on Front lamps
- 1.3% fail on Rear lamps
- 6.3% fail on Registration plate lamp
- 3.8% fail on Stop lamp
- 2.5% fail on Rear reflectors (5 times worse than other 1997 vans)
- 1.3% fail on Battery
-
1.3% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.3% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.3% fail on Side repeaters
-
1.3% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.3% fail on Horn
-
15% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(2 times worse than other 1997 vans)
-
35% fail on
Suspension
(58% worse than other 1997 vans)
-
16% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(3 times worse than other 1997 vans)
- 13% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (5 times worse than other 1997 vans)
- 2.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 1.3% fail on Linkage condition
-
13% fail on
Suspension arms
(3 times worse than other 1997 vans)
- 13% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (3 times worse than other 1997 vans)
-
6.3% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 5.1% fail on Component mounting
- 3.8% fail on Subframe mounting
-
5.1% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 5.1% fail on Condition
- 2.5% fail on Front suspension joints
-
2.5% fail on
Drive shafts
-
2.5% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 2.5% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
2.5% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
1.3% fail on
Leaf springs
- 1.3% fail on Condition
-
1.3% fail on
Sub-frames
- 1.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
16% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(3 times worse than other 1997 vans)
-
15% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 7.6% fail on Exhaust system
- 6.3% fail on Emissions (2 times worse than other 1997 vans)
- 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested
-
13% fail on
Steering
-
13% fail on
Steering system
(170% worse than other 1997 vans)
- 7.6% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 1997 vans)
- 6.3% fail on Track rod end
- 1.3% fail on Ball joint
-
13% fail on
Steering system
(170% worse than other 1997 vans)
-
11% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 8.9% fail on Wipers
- 1.3% fail on Windscreen
- 1.3% fail on Washers
-
8.9% fail on
Brakes
(57% better than other 1997 vans)
-
5.1% fail on
Hub components
- 5.1% fail on Brake pads
-
3.8% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
3.8% fail on
Components
- 3.8% fail on Pipes
-
3.8% fail on
Components
-
1.3% fail on
Brake performance
- 1.3% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance
-
5.1% fail on
Hub components
-
8.9% fail on
Tyres
- 5.1% fail on Condition
- 3.8% fail on Tread depth
- 1.3% fail on Size/type
-
5.1% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
-
2.5% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 2.5% fail on Chassis
- 2.5% fail on Body condition
-
1.3% fail on
Seats
- 1.3% fail on Passengers
-
2.5% fail on
Vehicle structure
-
3.8% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
3.8% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.3% fail on Condition
-
1.3% fail on
Installation check
- 1.3% fail on Anchorage's
- 1.3% fail on Prescribed areas
-
3.8% fail on
Seat belts
-
1.3% fail on
Towbars
- 1.3% fail on Vehicle structure
-
1.3% fail on
Road Wheels
- 1.3% fail on Attachment
-
1.3% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.3% fail on Registration plate