MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Nissan » NV200 Combi » 2011
Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Nissan NV200 Combi MOT Results

Registered in 2011
58.3% pass rate
from 127 tests in 2020
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2011 vans and highlighted areas where the Nissan NV200 Combi is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Suspension (75% worse than other 2011 vans)
    • 17% fail on Suspension arms (3 times worse than other 2011 vans)
      • 13% fail on Ball joint (4 times worse than other 2011 vans)
      • 3.9% fail on Ball joint dust cover (12 times worse than other 2011 vans)
      • 0.79% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 8.7% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 7.9% fail on Linkage ball joints (2 times worse than other 2011 vans)
      • 0.79% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.79% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.79% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.79% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.79% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.79% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 10% fail on Visibility
    • 6.3% fail on Wipers
    • 3.9% fail on Washers
    • 0.79% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.79% fail on View to rear
      • 0.79% fail on Mirrors
  • 9.4% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (55% better than other 2011 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.4% fail on Position lamp
    • 1.6% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.6% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.6% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.79% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.79% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.79% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.79% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.79% fail on Battery(ies)
  • 8.7% fail on Brakes
    • 4.7% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.9% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.9% fail on Rbt
          • 3.9% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.79% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.79% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.79% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.79% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.79% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.79% fail on Rbt
          • 0.79% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 2.4% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.6% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.6% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.6% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.79% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.79% fail on Electronic parking brake
    • 0.79% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.79% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  • 7.1% fail on Tyres
    • 3.9% fail on Condition
    • 3.9% fail on Tread depth
  • 5.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (2 times worse than other 2011 vans)
    • 4.7% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (5 times worse than other 2011 vans)
    • 0.79% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.79% fail on Condition
  • 4.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.7% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.7% fail on Compression ignition
        • 3.1% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 2.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 2.4% fail on Steering
    • 1.6% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.79% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.79% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.79% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.79% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.79% fail on Steering play
      • 0.79% fail on Steering rack
  • 1.6% fail on Road Wheels (5 times worse than other 2011 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Attachment (7 times worse than other 2011 vans)
  • 0.79% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.79% fail on Seats
      • 0.79% fail on Passenger's seat