MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Volkswagen » LT35 » 2002
Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Volkswagen LT35 MOT Results

Registered in 2002
43.7% pass rate
from 213 tests in 2020
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 vans and highlighted areas where the Volkswagen LT35 is unusually good or bad.

  • 36% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (47% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 15% fail on Headlamps (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 15% fail on Headlamp (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.47% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 9.9% fail on Headlamp aim (95% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 8.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 9.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (140% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 4.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.2% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.9% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 1.9% fail on Horn
      • 0.47% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.47% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 3.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.8% fail on Position lamp
    • 3.8% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.8% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.8% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 3.8% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 3.8% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 3.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.94% fail on Switch (7 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.94% fail on Outline marker lamps
      • 0.94% fail on Outline marker lamp
    • 0.47% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.47% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 31% fail on Brakes (55% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 23% fail on Brake performance (84% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 19% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 19% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 5.2% fail on Parking brake performance (150% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 4.2% fail on Rbt
          • 3.8% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.94% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.94% fail on Plate brake tester (21 times worse than other 2002 vans)
          • 0.47% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.47% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 4.7% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.7% fail on Rbt
          • 3.8% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 4.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 4.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 3.3% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.9% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.94% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 3.8% fail on Parking brake control (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 3.8% fail on Lever (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.9% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.9% fail on Brake discs
      • 1.4% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.47% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.47% fail on Cable
    • 2.8% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (6 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Anti-lock braking system (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.94% fail on Electronic stability control (24 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 1.4% fail on Air and vacuum systems (28 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Servos (44 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.47% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.47% fail on Pedal
    • 0.47% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.47% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.47% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 15% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 7.5% fail on Exhaust system (94% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.4% fail on Transmission
      • 1.4% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.47% fail on Prop shaft
        • 0.47% fail on Flexible couplings
        • 0.47% fail on Bearing housing
    • 0.94% fail on Chassis
      • 0.94% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.94% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.47% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.47% fail on System
    • 0.94% fail on Towbar
      • 0.47% fail on Other towbar components
      • 0.47% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.94% fail on Body
      • 0.47% fail on Mounting fixings
      • 0.47% fail on Other body component
    • 0.47% fail on Doors
      • 0.47% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.47% fail on Door condition
    • 0.47% fail on Seats
      • 0.47% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 15% fail on Suspension
    • 8.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 4.2% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 3.8% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.47% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.47% fail on Linkage
    • 3.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.3% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.47% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 2.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (68% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.94% fail on Springs
      • 0.47% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.47% fail on Spring saddle
      • 0.47% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.94% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.94% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.47% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 8.0% fail on Steering
    • 5.6% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 4.7% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.94% fail on Ball joint
    • 2.3% fail on Steering gear
      • 2.3% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.47% fail on Power steering
      • 0.47% fail on Pipes and hoses
  • 7.0% fail on Visibility
    • 4.2% fail on Wipers
    • 1.9% fail on View to rear
      • 1.9% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.94% fail on Washers (79% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.47% fail on Bonnet
  • 6.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.2% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.2% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.9% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 1.4% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.47% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.47% fail on Exhaust gas recirculation valve
        • 0.47% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
    • 1.9% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.94% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.47% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
      • 0.47% fail on Other leaks
  • 3.8% fail on Tyres
    • 2.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.4% fail on Condition
  • 2.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.9% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.4% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.47% fail on Condition
    • 0.47% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 1.4% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plates