DPF ruining MPG?

I've read and understand all your replies to the 'my car doesn't achieve what the official figures say', but I have had a shock on my recent change of car. I have had a series of Volvo V70 D5's and been very impressed with the fuel economy; a 2002 manual achieved 46mpg, a 2005 geartronic 41 mpg. I have just switched to a 2008 manual, and with the same driving style only achieve 34 mpg.

This is right at the bottom of the 'real' figures on your website, with other drivers reporting 34.8-45.2 (I would be VERY happy with 45.2).

It has been suggested that this generation of Volvo is far less efficient because the Diesel Particulate Filter (DPF) strangles the exhaust. What is your view on this? Is the government insisting on a rule that increases fuel consumption?

It has also been suggested that I could have the DPF removed and engine remapped for economy by an after-market company, is this legal and does it work?

Asked on 7 March 2013 by Geoff, Knutsford

Answered by Honest John

If you do high mileage it will be much more efficient than if you do low mileage and the system is forever having to inject more diesel into the engine to burn off the soot in the DPF.

Tags: fuel economy real mpg

Similar questions

Is it fair to compare my 2007 Volvo D5's fuel economy against the 2013 model?

I was pleased to get 49.4 mpg real whilst averaging 53mph over 760 miles. The combined "book" figure for my 2007 Volvo D5 manual was shown as 41.5mpg and for model year 2013 is 55.4mpg - a very significant...

Do the 'economy' tyre pressure settings on my Vauxhall Insignia help with mpg and will they affect tyre wear?

I recently bought a secondhand 2009 Insignia 2.0 CDTI SE to replace my 2001 Toyota Avensis 1.8 VVTI. I hoped to improve fuel economy with my change in car. The Insignia, which is a diesel, has only just...