Poor fuel consumption

I owned a Lexus RX400h, which gave consistent results of 34mpg summer and 33mpg winter.

My current Lexus Rx450h (2009 with 70,000 miles) doesn't get much better than 32mpg.

It's puzzling as the 400h is rated at 34mpg and the 450h 44mpg. If I could achieve close to the rated mpg with the 400h, why cannot I achieve better with the 450h? My driving journeys and habits have not changed, if anything, I have become more diligent in trying to achieve the better economy.

Asked on 23 June 2013 by fivelnote

Answered by Honest John
I got that from a 400h. The reason why the 450h is not more economical in real life is that it was optimised for the ECDC lab test cycle in order to get it rated lower CO2. Optimising engines for the EC tests sacrifices some of their efficiency in real life conditions.
Similar questions
I recently bought a secondhand 2009 Insignia 2.0 CDTI SE to replace my 2001 Toyota Avensis 1.8 VVTI. I hoped to improve fuel economy with my change in car. The Insignia, which is a diesel, has only just...
I am looking to purchase a 3-4 year old car. What is the best petrol vehicle that provides 55 miles to the gallon?
I want to upgrade my 2006 Toyota Corrolla. I have £10,000 to spend and require a reliable, stylish and economical car that will accommodate my wife and daughter. My daily commute is 30 miles and I also...
Related models
Refined and cossetting. Strong performance from hybrid powerplant. Superbly engineered and well built. Low CO2 for a large 4x4 along with good fuel economy.
 

Value my car

Save £75 on Warranty using code HJ75

with MotorEasy

Get a warranty quote

Save 12% on GAP Insurance

Use HJ21 to save on an ALA policy

See offer