Citroen Berlingo MOT Results
Registered in 199747.1% pass rate
from 329 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1997 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Berlingo is unusually good or bad.
-
29% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 8.5% fail on Stop lamp (68% worse than other 1997 vans)
-
8.2% fail on
Position lamps
- 5.8% fail on Front lamps
- 2.7% fail on Rear lamps
- 0.30% fail on All position lamps
- 6.7% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
6.1% fail on
Direction indicators
-
6.1% fail on
Flashing type
- 4.6% fail on Individual lamps (120% worse than other 1997 vans)
- 1.2% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.30% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.30% fail on Switch
-
6.1% fail on
Flashing type
- 4.9% fail on Headlamp aim
-
2.7% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.7% fail on Headlamp
-
2.4% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 2.4% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.30% fail on Tell tale
- 2.1% fail on Battery
- 1.5% fail on Horn
-
0.30% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.30% fail on Switch
-
25% fail on
Suspension
-
12% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 6.7% fail on Component mounting
- 4.3% fail on Subframe mounting
- 2.1% fail on Spring mounting
-
7.9% fail on
Suspension arms
(170% worse than other 1997 vans)
- 7.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (180% worse than other 1997 vans)
-
4.6% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 3.3% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.61% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.30% fail on Attachment
- 0.30% fail on Linkage condition
-
3.3% fail on
Drive shafts
-
3.3% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 3.3% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
3.3% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
2.7% fail on
Coil springs
- 2.7% fail on Condition (150% worse than other 1997 vans)
-
2.1% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 1.5% fail on Front
- 0.61% fail on Rear
-
1.5% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 1.5% fail on Condition
-
1.2% fail on
Macpherson strut
(6 times worse than other 1997 vans)
- 1.2% fail on Condition (6 times worse than other 1997 vans)
-
1.2% fail on
Sub-frames
(4 times worse than other 1997 vans)
- 0.61% fail on Attachment (13 times worse than other 1997 vans)
- 0.30% fail on Condition
- 0.30% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 1.2% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.30% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.30% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.30% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.30% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.30% fail on
Axles
- 0.30% fail on Swivel joints/housing
-
12% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
23% fail on
Brakes
-
14% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(51% worse than other 1997 vans)
-
13% fail on
Components
(53% worse than other 1997 vans)
- 7.9% fail on Valves (3 times worse than other 1997 vans)
- 3.6% fail on Hoses
- 2.4% fail on Pipes
- 0.30% fail on Cylinders
- 0.30% fail on Reservoirs
- 1.5% fail on Leaks
-
13% fail on
Components
(53% worse than other 1997 vans)
-
11% fail on
Brake performance
- 6.4% fail on Front wheels
- 4.6% fail on Rear wheels
- 3.0% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance (70% better than other 1997 vans)
- 0.30% fail on Brake imbalance
-
1.2% fail on
Hub components
- 0.61% fail on Brake discs
- 0.30% fail on Brake pads
- 0.30% fail on Wheel cylinder
- 1.2% fail on Restricted movement
-
1.2% fail on
Prescribed areas
(2 times worse than other 1997 vans)
- 1.2% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (11 times worse than other 1997 vans)
-
0.91% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.91% fail on Condition
-
0.61% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.61% fail on
Pedal
- 0.30% fail on Condition
- 0.30% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.61% fail on
Pedal
-
14% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(51% worse than other 1997 vans)
-
13% fail on
Tyres
(84% worse than other 1997 vans)
- 6.4% fail on Tread depth (78% worse than other 1997 vans)
- 5.8% fail on Condition
- 0.91% fail on Size/type
- 0.61% fail on Valve stem
-
11% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 6.7% fail on Wipers
- 5.2% fail on Washers
- 0.91% fail on Mirrors
- 0.61% fail on Windscreen
-
7.3% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 4.3% fail on Exhaust system
-
1.8% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.91% fail on System
- 0.61% fail on Cap
- 0.30% fail on Pipe
- 1.5% fail on Emissions
- 0.61% fail on Emissions not tested
-
6.7% fail on
Steering
-
5.2% fail on
Steering system
- 4.0% fail on Track rod end
- 0.91% fail on Steering rack
- 0.30% fail on Ball joint
-
1.2% fail on
Power steering
- 0.61% fail on Operation
- 0.30% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.30% fail on Other components
-
0.30% fail on
Steering control
- 0.30% fail on Steering wheel
- 0.30% fail on Steering operation
-
5.2% fail on
Steering system
-
6.7% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 2.4% fail on Body condition
-
2.1% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 2.1% fail on Chassis
- 0.61% fail on Speedometer (8 times worse than other 1997 vans)
-
0.61% fail on
Doors
- 0.30% fail on Drivers
- 0.30% fail on Passengers other
- 0.61% fail on Spare wheel (5 times worse than other 1997 vans)
-
0.30% fail on
Seats
- 0.30% fail on Passengers
-
4.0% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
3.6% fail on
Seat belts
- 2.4% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.91% fail on Condition
- 0.30% fail on Requirements
- 0.30% fail on Attachment
-
0.30% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.30% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
3.6% fail on
Seat belts
-
1.5% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.5% fail on Registration plate
-
0.30% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.30% fail on Attachment