MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Citroen » Berlingo » 1997

Citroen Berlingo MOT Results

Registered in 1997
47.1% pass rate
from 329 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1997 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Berlingo is unusually good or bad.

  • 29% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 8.5% fail on Stop lamp (68% worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 8.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.8% fail on Front lamps
      • 2.7% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.30% fail on All position lamps
    • 6.7% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 6.1% fail on Direction indicators
      • 6.1% fail on Flashing type
        • 4.6% fail on Individual lamps (120% worse than other 1997 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.30% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.30% fail on Switch
    • 4.9% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 2.4% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.30% fail on Tell tale
    • 2.1% fail on Battery
    • 1.5% fail on Horn
    • 0.30% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.30% fail on Switch
  • 25% fail on Suspension
    • 12% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 6.7% fail on Component mounting
      • 4.3% fail on Subframe mounting
      • 2.1% fail on Spring mounting
    • 7.9% fail on Suspension arms (170% worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 7.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (180% worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 4.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.3% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.61% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.30% fail on Attachment
      • 0.30% fail on Linkage condition
    • 3.3% fail on Drive shafts
      • 3.3% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 3.3% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 2.7% fail on Coil springs
      • 2.7% fail on Condition (150% worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.5% fail on Front
      • 0.61% fail on Rear
    • 1.5% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.5% fail on Condition
    • 1.2% fail on Macpherson strut (6 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Condition (6 times worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Sub-frames (4 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 0.61% fail on Attachment (13 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Condition
      • 0.30% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.2% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.30% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.30% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.30% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.30% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.30% fail on Axles
      • 0.30% fail on Swivel joints/housing
  • 23% fail on Brakes
    • 14% fail on Hydraulic systems (51% worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 13% fail on Components (53% worse than other 1997 vans)
        • 7.9% fail on Valves (3 times worse than other 1997 vans)
        • 3.6% fail on Hoses
        • 2.4% fail on Pipes
        • 0.30% fail on Cylinders
        • 0.30% fail on Reservoirs
      • 1.5% fail on Leaks
    • 11% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.4% fail on Front wheels
      • 4.6% fail on Rear wheels
      • 3.0% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance (70% better than other 1997 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 1.2% fail on Hub components
      • 0.61% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.30% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.30% fail on Wheel cylinder
    • 1.2% fail on Restricted movement
    • 1.2% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (11 times worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 0.91% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.91% fail on Condition
    • 0.61% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.61% fail on Pedal
        • 0.30% fail on Condition
        • 0.30% fail on Anti-slip
  • 13% fail on Tyres (84% worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 6.4% fail on Tread depth (78% worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 5.8% fail on Condition
    • 0.91% fail on Size/type
    • 0.61% fail on Valve stem
  • 11% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 6.7% fail on Wipers
    • 5.2% fail on Washers
    • 0.91% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.61% fail on Windscreen
  • 7.3% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 4.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.8% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.91% fail on System
      • 0.61% fail on Cap
      • 0.30% fail on Pipe
    • 1.5% fail on Emissions
    • 0.61% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 6.7% fail on Steering
    • 5.2% fail on Steering system
      • 4.0% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.91% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.30% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.2% fail on Power steering
      • 0.61% fail on Operation
      • 0.30% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.30% fail on Other components
    • 0.30% fail on Steering control
      • 0.30% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.30% fail on Steering operation
  • 6.7% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 2.4% fail on Body condition
    • 2.1% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 2.1% fail on Chassis
    • 0.61% fail on Speedometer (8 times worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 0.61% fail on Doors
      • 0.30% fail on Drivers
      • 0.30% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.61% fail on Spare wheel (5 times worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 0.30% fail on Seats
      • 0.30% fail on Passengers
  • 4.0% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 3.6% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.4% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.91% fail on Condition
      • 0.30% fail on Requirements
      • 0.30% fail on Attachment
    • 0.30% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.30% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 1.5% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.30% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.30% fail on Attachment