Citroen Berlingo MOT Results
Registered in 199844.9% pass rate
from 594 tests in 2017
(13% worse than other 1998 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1998 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Berlingo is unusually good or bad.
-
31% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 9.6% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
9.4% fail on
Direction indicators
(150% worse than other 1998 vans)
-
9.4% fail on
Flashing type
(150% worse than other 1998 vans)
- 7.6% fail on Individual lamps (2 times worse than other 1998 vans)
- 1.3% fail on All direction indicators (2 times worse than other 1998 vans)
- 0.51% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.34% fail on Switch
-
9.4% fail on
Flashing type
(150% worse than other 1998 vans)
-
8.9% fail on
Position lamps
- 5.6% fail on Front lamps
- 3.5% fail on Rear lamps
- 0.17% fail on All position lamps
- 8.9% fail on Stop lamp (74% worse than other 1998 vans)
- 6.4% fail on Headlamp aim
- 1.5% fail on Battery
-
1.5% fail on
Headlamps
(66% better than other 1998 vans)
- 1.5% fail on Headlamp (65% better than other 1998 vans)
-
1.3% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(68% better than other 1998 vans)
- 0.84% fail on Fog lamp (79% better than other 1998 vans)
- 0.34% fail on Tell tale
- 0.34% fail on Switch
- 0.67% fail on Horn (79% better than other 1998 vans)
- 0.51% fail on Electrical wiring
-
30% fail on
Suspension
(35% worse than other 1998 vans)
-
11% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 6.4% fail on Component mounting
- 4.5% fail on Subframe mounting (120% worse than other 1998 vans)
- 2.0% fail on Spring mounting
-
8.4% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(160% worse than other 1998 vans)
- 6.4% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 1998 vans)
- 1.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.34% fail on Linkage condition
- 0.17% fail on Condition
-
6.9% fail on
Suspension arms
(110% worse than other 1998 vans)
- 6.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (120% worse than other 1998 vans)
- 0.17% fail on Condition
- 0.17% fail on Attachment
-
4.5% fail on
Coil springs
(2 times worse than other 1998 vans)
- 4.2% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 1998 vans)
- 0.51% fail on Location (10 times worse than other 1998 vans)
- 3.4% fail on Front suspension joints
-
3.2% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 2.7% fail on Front (110% worse than other 1998 vans)
- 0.67% fail on Rear
-
3.2% fail on
Drive shafts
-
3.0% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 2.9% fail on Constant velocity joints
- 0.17% fail on Couplings
-
0.17% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.17% fail on Drive shafts
-
3.0% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
1.2% fail on
Sub-frames
(4 times worse than other 1998 vans)
- 0.51% fail on Attachment (9 times worse than other 1998 vans)
- 0.34% fail on Condition
- 0.34% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (12 times worse than other 1998 vans)
-
0.67% fail on
Radius arms
(10 times worse than other 1998 vans)
- 0.67% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (11 times worse than other 1998 vans)
-
0.67% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 0.67% fail on Condition
- 0.34% fail on General condition (7 times worse than other 1998 vans)
-
0.34% fail on
Axles
- 0.17% fail on Stub axle
- 0.17% fail on Clearance
-
0.17% fail on
Fluid suspension
- 0.17% fail on Suspension unit
-
0.17% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.17% fail on Condition
- 0.17% fail on Attachment
-
0.17% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.17% fail on Condition
-
11% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
25% fail on
Brakes
(24% worse than other 1998 vans)
-
15% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(55% worse than other 1998 vans)
-
13% fail on
Components
(52% worse than other 1998 vans)
- 7.1% fail on Valves (2 times worse than other 1998 vans)
- 5.1% fail on Pipes
- 3.2% fail on Hoses
- 0.17% fail on Reservoirs
- 1.5% fail on Leaks
- 0.34% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
-
13% fail on
Components
(52% worse than other 1998 vans)
-
14% fail on
Brake performance
- 8.2% fail on Front wheels (76% worse than other 1998 vans)
- 7.1% fail on Rear wheels
- 3.7% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance (70% better than other 1998 vans)
- 0.51% fail on Brake imbalance
-
1.7% fail on
Hub components
- 0.84% fail on Brake pads
- 0.84% fail on Brake discs
- 1.0% fail on Restricted movement
-
1.0% fail on
Prescribed areas
(2 times worse than other 1998 vans)
- 1.0% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (8 times worse than other 1998 vans)
-
0.84% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.84% fail on
Pedal
- 0.84% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.84% fail on
Pedal
-
0.51% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.51% fail on Condition
-
15% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(55% worse than other 1998 vans)
-
13% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 6.7% fail on Wipers
- 5.4% fail on Washers
- 1.0% fail on Mirrors
- 0.84% fail on Windscreen
- 0.17% fail on Bonnet
-
11% fail on
Tyres
(72% worse than other 1998 vans)
- 6.1% fail on Tread depth (80% worse than other 1998 vans)
- 4.7% fail on Condition
- 1.7% fail on Size/type (3 times worse than other 1998 vans)
- 0.17% fail on Valve stem
-
8.4% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 5.1% fail on Exhaust system
-
2.4% fail on
Fuel system
- 2.2% fail on System (190% worse than other 1998 vans)
- 0.34% fail on Cap
- 1.5% fail on Emissions
- 0.34% fail on Emissions not tested
-
7.4% fail on
Steering
-
6.7% fail on
Steering system
- 4.5% fail on Track rod end (80% worse than other 1998 vans)
- 1.7% fail on Steering rack
- 0.34% fail on Ball joint
-
0.17% fail on
Free play
- 0.17% fail on Steering rack
- 0.17% fail on Steering arm
-
0.84% fail on
Power steering
- 0.34% fail on Other components
- 0.17% fail on Operation
- 0.17% fail on Pump
- 0.17% fail on Rams
-
0.17% fail on
Steering control
- 0.17% fail on Steering column
- 0.17% fail on Steering operation
-
6.7% fail on
Steering system
-
4.9% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(41% better than other 1998 vans)
- 2.2% fail on Body condition (50% better than other 1998 vans)
-
2.0% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 2.0% fail on Chassis
-
0.34% fail on
Doors
- 0.34% fail on Passengers other
- 0.34% fail on Spare wheel (5 times worse than other 1998 vans)
- 0.17% fail on Body security
-
0.17% fail on
Seats
- 0.17% fail on Passengers
-
3.0% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
2.5% fail on
Seat belts
(51% better than other 1998 vans)
- 2.4% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.17% fail on Condition
-
0.51% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.51% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
2.5% fail on
Seat belts
(51% better than other 1998 vans)
-
1.0% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.0% fail on Registration plate
-
0.51% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.34% fail on Attachment
- 0.17% fail on Condition
-
0.17% fail on
Towbars
- 0.17% fail on Towbar
- 0.17% fail on Vehicle structure