MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Citroen » Berlingo » 1998
Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Citroen Berlingo MOT Results

Registered in 1998
44.9% pass rate
from 594 tests in 2017
(13% worse than other 1998 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1998 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Berlingo is unusually good or bad.

  • 31% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 9.6% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 9.4% fail on Direction indicators (150% worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 9.4% fail on Flashing type (150% worse than other 1998 vans)
        • 7.6% fail on Individual lamps (2 times worse than other 1998 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on All direction indicators (2 times worse than other 1998 vans)
        • 0.51% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.34% fail on Switch
    • 8.9% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.6% fail on Front lamps
      • 3.5% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.17% fail on All position lamps
    • 8.9% fail on Stop lamp (74% worse than other 1998 vans)
    • 6.4% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.5% fail on Battery
    • 1.5% fail on Headlamps (66% better than other 1998 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp (65% better than other 1998 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (68% better than other 1998 vans)
      • 0.84% fail on Fog lamp (79% better than other 1998 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.34% fail on Switch
    • 0.67% fail on Horn (79% better than other 1998 vans)
    • 0.51% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 30% fail on Suspension (35% worse than other 1998 vans)
    • 11% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 6.4% fail on Component mounting
      • 4.5% fail on Subframe mounting (120% worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Spring mounting
    • 8.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (160% worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 6.4% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.34% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.17% fail on Condition
    • 6.9% fail on Suspension arms (110% worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 6.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (120% worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Condition
      • 0.17% fail on Attachment
    • 4.5% fail on Coil springs (2 times worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 4.2% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 0.51% fail on Location (10 times worse than other 1998 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 3.2% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 2.7% fail on Front (110% worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 0.67% fail on Rear
    • 3.2% fail on Drive shafts
      • 3.0% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 2.9% fail on Constant velocity joints
        • 0.17% fail on Couplings
      • 0.17% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.17% fail on Drive shafts
    • 1.2% fail on Sub-frames (4 times worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 0.51% fail on Attachment (9 times worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Condition
      • 0.34% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (12 times worse than other 1998 vans)
    • 0.67% fail on Radius arms (10 times worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 0.67% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (11 times worse than other 1998 vans)
    • 0.67% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.67% fail on Condition
    • 0.34% fail on General condition (7 times worse than other 1998 vans)
    • 0.34% fail on Axles
      • 0.17% fail on Stub axle
      • 0.17% fail on Clearance
    • 0.17% fail on Fluid suspension
      • 0.17% fail on Suspension unit
    • 0.17% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.17% fail on Condition
      • 0.17% fail on Attachment
    • 0.17% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.17% fail on Condition
  • 25% fail on Brakes (24% worse than other 1998 vans)
    • 15% fail on Hydraulic systems (55% worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 13% fail on Components (52% worse than other 1998 vans)
        • 7.1% fail on Valves (2 times worse than other 1998 vans)
        • 5.1% fail on Pipes
        • 3.2% fail on Hoses
        • 0.17% fail on Reservoirs
      • 1.5% fail on Leaks
      • 0.34% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 14% fail on Brake performance
      • 8.2% fail on Front wheels (76% worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 7.1% fail on Rear wheels
      • 3.7% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance (70% better than other 1998 vans)
      • 0.51% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 1.7% fail on Hub components
      • 0.84% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.84% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.0% fail on Restricted movement
    • 1.0% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (8 times worse than other 1998 vans)
    • 0.84% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.84% fail on Pedal
        • 0.84% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.51% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.51% fail on Condition
  • 13% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 6.7% fail on Wipers
    • 5.4% fail on Washers
    • 1.0% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.84% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.17% fail on Bonnet
  • 11% fail on Tyres (72% worse than other 1998 vans)
    • 6.1% fail on Tread depth (80% worse than other 1998 vans)
    • 4.7% fail on Condition
    • 1.7% fail on Size/type (3 times worse than other 1998 vans)
    • 0.17% fail on Valve stem
  • 8.4% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 5.1% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.4% fail on Fuel system
      • 2.2% fail on System (190% worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Cap
    • 1.5% fail on Emissions
    • 0.34% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 7.4% fail on Steering
    • 6.7% fail on Steering system
      • 4.5% fail on Track rod end (80% worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.34% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.17% fail on Free play
        • 0.17% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.17% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.84% fail on Power steering
      • 0.34% fail on Other components
      • 0.17% fail on Operation
      • 0.17% fail on Pump
      • 0.17% fail on Rams
    • 0.17% fail on Steering control
      • 0.17% fail on Steering column
    • 0.17% fail on Steering operation
  • 4.9% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (41% better than other 1998 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Body condition (50% better than other 1998 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 2.0% fail on Chassis
    • 0.34% fail on Doors
      • 0.34% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.34% fail on Spare wheel (5 times worse than other 1998 vans)
    • 0.17% fail on Body security
    • 0.17% fail on Seats
      • 0.17% fail on Passengers
  • 3.0% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 2.5% fail on Seat belts (51% better than other 1998 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.17% fail on Condition
    • 0.51% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.51% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 1.0% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.0% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.51% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.34% fail on Attachment
    • 0.17% fail on Condition
  • 0.17% fail on Towbars
    • 0.17% fail on Towbar
    • 0.17% fail on Vehicle structure