MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Citroen » Berlingo » 1999

Citroen Berlingo MOT Results

Registered in 1999
48.2% pass rate
from 895 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Berlingo is unusually good or bad.

  • 32% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (15% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 11% fail on Direction indicators (180% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 11% fail on Flashing type (180% worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 6.6% fail on Individual lamps (170% worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 4.0% fail on Side repeaters (3 times worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on All direction indicators (170% worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 0.45% fail on Switch (3 times worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 10% fail on Stop lamp (88% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 9.8% fail on Position lamps (44% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 7.5% fail on Front lamps (68% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 2.8% fail on Rear lamps
    • 8.9% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 4.4% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamps (48% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp (52% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.11% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
      • 0.11% fail on Switch
    • 2.1% fail on Battery
    • 2.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (51% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Fog lamp (52% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.45% fail on Tell tale
    • 1.1% fail on Horn (55% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.11% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.11% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.11% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 26% fail on Suspension
    • 7.4% fail on Suspension arms (110% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 6.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (110% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Attachment (3 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Condition
    • 7.4% fail on Prescribed areas (33% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 5.1% fail on Component mounting
      • 2.0% fail on Subframe mounting
      • 1.2% fail on Spring mounting (69% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 7.3% fail on Anti-roll bars (130% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 5.6% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.56% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment
    • 3.5% fail on Coil springs (170% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 3.1% fail on Condition (150% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Location (8 times worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 3.5% fail on Drive shafts
      • 3.5% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 3.5% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 2.5% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 2.0% fail on Front
      • 0.45% fail on Rear
    • 1.3% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.56% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.56% fail on Condition
    • 0.56% fail on Shock absorbers (69% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.56% fail on Condition (69% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.22% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.11% fail on Condition
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment
    • 0.22% fail on Axles
      • 0.22% fail on Swivel joints/housing (8 times worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.11% fail on Torsion bars
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment
    • 0.11% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.11% fail on Condition
    • 0.11% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.11% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.11% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.11% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.11% fail on Torque/reaction arms
      • 0.11% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 25% fail on Brakes (24% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 16% fail on Hydraulic systems (77% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 16% fail on Components (79% worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 8.5% fail on Valves (2 times worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 4.8% fail on Pipes
        • 4.8% fail on Hoses (97% worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 0.45% fail on Reservoirs
      • 1.0% fail on Leaks
      • 0.22% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.11% fail on Operation
    • 14% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.4% fail on Front wheels (40% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 5.5% fail on Rear wheels
      • 5.3% fail on Service brake performance (71% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance (77% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.8% fail on Hub components
      • 0.89% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.89% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.11% fail on Wheel cylinder
    • 0.67% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.67% fail on Pedal
        • 0.45% fail on Anti-slip
        • 0.22% fail on Condition
    • 0.34% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.34% fail on Condition
    • 0.34% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.34% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.34% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
    • 0.11% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.11% fail on Brake slack adjuster
  • 11% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 6.5% fail on Wipers
    • 4.1% fail on Washers
    • 0.89% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.78% fail on Mirrors
  • 9.9% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 8.3% fail on Exhaust system (42% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.56% fail on System
      • 0.45% fail on Cap
      • 0.11% fail on Hose
      • 0.11% fail on Pipe
    • 1.1% fail on Emissions
    • 1.0% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 9.3% fail on Tyres (35% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 5.4% fail on Tread depth (45% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 4.0% fail on Condition
    • 1.6% fail on Size/type (2 times worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.11% fail on Valve stem
  • 8.6% fail on Steering
    • 7.5% fail on Steering system
      • 4.6% fail on Track rod end (51% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.45% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.34% fail on Free play
        • 0.34% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.11% fail on Steering damper
      • 0.11% fail on Other components
        • 0.11% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 0.67% fail on Power steering
      • 0.22% fail on Operation
      • 0.22% fail on Drive system
      • 0.11% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.11% fail on Rams
      • 0.11% fail on Other components
    • 0.34% fail on Steering control
      • 0.22% fail on Steering wheel
      • 0.11% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.11% fail on Universal joint
    • 0.22% fail on Steering operation
  • 5.6% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (32% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Body condition (51% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.7% fail on Chassis
    • 0.67% fail on Doors
      • 0.34% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.22% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.11% fail on Drivers
    • 0.67% fail on Seats
      • 0.56% fail on Passengers
      • 0.11% fail on Drivers
    • 0.34% fail on Spare wheel
    • 0.22% fail on Speedometer
  • 4.2% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 2.5% fail on Seat belts (51% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Prescribed areas (48% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Condition
    • 1.8% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (4 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (4 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 1.2% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.45% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.34% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.11% fail on Attachment
  • 0.11% fail on Towbars
    • 0.11% fail on Vehicle structure