Citroen Berlingo MOT Results

Registered in 2002
48.2% pass rate
from 5,066 tests in 2020
(5.1% worse than other 2002 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Berlingo is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 10% fail on Stop lamp (57% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 6.7% fail on Direction indicators (81% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 6.7% fail on Flashing type (81% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 4.3% fail on Individual direction indicators (75% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 2.8% fail on Side repeaters (140% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.47% fail on All direction indicators (81% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.039% fail on Switch
    • 4.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.3% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.12% fail on All position lamps
    • 3.9% fail on Headlamp aim (22% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 3.8% fail on Headlamp aim (20% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (21% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamps (39% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp (38% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.0% fail on Electrical equipment (37% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Horn (49% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.77% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.099% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.020% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.95% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (74% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.93% fail on Rear fog lamp (75% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.91% fail on Rear fog lamp (75% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.039% fail on Switch
      • 0.020% fail on Front fog lamps
        • 0.020% fail on Front fog lamps
    • 0.039% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.039% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
      • 0.020% fail on Main beam tell-tale
    • 0.020% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.020% fail on Switch
    • 0.020% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 22% fail on Suspension
    • 8.5% fail on Suspension arms (33% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 4.6% fail on Ball joint (37% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 3.9% fail on Pins and bushes (110% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.73% fail on Ball joint dust cover (51% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.099% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.099% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 7.8% fail on Anti-roll bars (73% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 3.8% fail on Linkage ball joints (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.83% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.32% fail on Linkage
      • 0.12% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (89% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.059% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.059% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.020% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 3.7% fail on Springs
      • 3.7% fail on Coil springs (110% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 3.6% fail on Coil spring (110% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.099% fail on Mounting
      • 0.039% fail on Torsion bars (12 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.039% fail on Torsion bar (12 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 2.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (67% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.67% fail on Macpherson strut (94% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.39% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (150% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Macpherson strut (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.099% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.020% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.59% fail on Shock absorbers (60% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.55% fail on Other suspension component (43% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.39% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.079% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.039% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.039% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.020% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.32% fail on Axles
      • 0.12% fail on Axle (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
      • 0.079% fail on Swivel joints/housing (12 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.020% fail on Stub axle
    • 0.28% fail on Sub-frames (70% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.099% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (86% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.039% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.020% fail on Sub-frame
    • 0.020% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.020% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.020% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension
      • 0.020% fail on Suspension unit
  • 19% fail on Brakes (7.4% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 7.6% fail on Brake performance (40% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 5.0% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 4.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 2.6% fail on Service brake performance
          • 2.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.039% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.039% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 3.3% fail on Service brake performance (35% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 3.2% fail on Rbt (35% better than other 2002 vans)
          • 2.2% fail on Service brake performance (45% better than other 2002 vans)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.039% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.059% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.039% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.020% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.0% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (83% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.99% fail on Rbt (sp) (83% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.020% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 0.49% fail on Parking brake performance (76% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.49% fail on Rbt (75% better than other 2002 vans)
          • 0.41% fail on Parking brake performance (76% better than other 2002 vans)
          • 0.079% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.26% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 7.4% fail on Load sensing valves (180% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 5.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.6% fail on Mechanical brake components (20% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.7% fail on Brake discs (33% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.039% fail on Brake drums
      • 1.1% fail on Brake linings and pads (29% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.099% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (86% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.079% fail on Cable (86% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.020% fail on Lever
    • 0.39% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (43% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Pedal
      • 0.099% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.36% fail on Parking brake control (47% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.36% fail on Lever (47% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.30% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.24% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.099% fail on Valves
      • 0.079% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.039% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.020% fail on Servos
    • 0.18% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.18% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.14% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (65% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.079% fail on Other components
      • 0.039% fail on Prescribed areas (89% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.020% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
        • 0.020% fail on Other braking system component
      • 0.020% fail on Additional braking device
    • 0.14% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (64% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.099% fail on Anti-lock braking system (73% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.039% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.020% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.020% fail on Leaks
  • 15% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 6.7% fail on Exhaust system (72% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 6.6% fail on Transmission (31% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 6.3% fail on Drive shafts (65% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 6.3% fail on Joints (65% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.079% fail on Drive shaft
        • 0.020% fail on Flexible couplings
        • 0.020% fail on Bearing housing
      • 0.24% fail on Prop shafts (81% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.24% fail on Joints
      • 0.020% fail on Belts
    • 0.85% fail on Doors
      • 0.67% fail on Other passenger's door (130% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.65% fail on Door condition (150% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.020% fail on Catch
      • 0.099% fail on Driver's door (70% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.099% fail on Door condition (66% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.099% fail on Front passenger's door (72% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.099% fail on Door condition (71% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.73% fail on Chassis (76% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.73% fail on Chassis condition (75% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.020% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 0.69% fail on Integral vehicle structure (72% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.69% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (72% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.43% fail on Seats
      • 0.26% fail on Passenger's seat
      • 0.20% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.32% fail on Body (71% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Other body component
      • 0.020% fail on Mounting fixings
      • 0.020% fail on Panel
    • 0.30% fail on Fuel system (72% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (64% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.079% fail on Pipe
      • 0.039% fail on Hose
      • 0.039% fail on System (80% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.20% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.18% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.16% fail on Carrier
      • 0.020% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.16% fail on Towbar (58% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.039% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.099% fail on Undertray
    • 0.079% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.059% fail on Engine mounting condition
      • 0.020% fail on Bracket
    • 0.039% fail on Load security
      • 0.039% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.020% fail on Tailgate condition
        • 0.020% fail on Other tailgate component
    • 0.039% fail on Cabs (87% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.039% fail on Prescribed areas (83% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.020% fail on Floor
    • 0.020% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.020% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 10% fail on Visibility
    • 5.3% fail on Wipers
    • 4.3% fail on Washers
    • 0.81% fail on View to rear
      • 0.77% fail on Mirrors
      • 0.039% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.43% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.43% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.16% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.16% fail on Bonnet
  • 7.8% fail on Tyres (23% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 4.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.3% fail on Condition (31% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.36% fail on Size/type
  • 6.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (41% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 4.1% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Seat belts (21% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Prescribed areas (27% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.83% fail on Condition
      • 0.099% fail on Requirements
      • 0.020% fail on Attachment
      • 0.020% fail on Pre-tensioners
    • 0.16% fail on Airbags (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Drivers airbag
      • 0.020% fail on Passengers airbag
  • 6.7% fail on Steering
    • 4.9% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 4.7% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.24% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.039% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.020% fail on Other components
        • 0.020% fail on Steering linkage
    • 1.1% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.99% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.099% fail on Operation
    • 0.97% fail on Power steering
      • 0.38% fail on Other components
      • 0.30% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.18% fail on Operation
      • 0.099% fail on Rams (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.059% fail on Pump
    • 0.099% fail on Steering play (65% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.099% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.020% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.020% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.020% fail on Universal joint
  • 3.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (33% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Exhaust emissions (38% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Compression ignition (52% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.85% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.39% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (83% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.39% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.18% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.039% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.039% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.039% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.020% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 1.0% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.49% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.30% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.28% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.059% fail on Non catalyst emissions
    • 0.91% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.75% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.099% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.099% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.039% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.039% fail on Sound deadening material
  • 0.59% fail on Identification of the vehicle (46% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.57% fail on Registration plates (46% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.020% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.26% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.18% fail on Attachment
    • 0.059% fail on Condition
    • 0.020% fail on Hubs
  • 0.059% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.059% fail on Speedometer